Quote :

"Maybe this is a sister that looks just like her...but would you still hit this? http://thewolfweb.com/photos/00422482.jpg http://thewolfweb.com/photos/00422483.jpg Ya know, I used to always think she was pretty cute. At least in the face. And indeed, I tried to holla for awhile on the IM, but she lives (lived?) way up in the Wake Forest area, or at least somewhere kinda far away, and she really did seem to lack self confidence about her appearance. That was kinda a turnoff. Then awhile back (in the past year I think), she posted some pics of herself that someone had taken at a wedding where it looked like she was a bridesmaid. And her body was nothing like I was imagining it. You look at that one bikini pic she has in her gallery and you think that she might be pretty hot, but those pics of her from the wedding were definitely not. Lemme see if I can find em. "

sorry to hijack

lets play "WHAT WOLFWEBBER SAID THIS"

4/7/2007 9:06:06 PM

was that State409c or TypeA or BlindHate or maybe hellbound?

4/7/2007 9:06:54 PM

i'll give u all a hint...treetwista just named the person in ^

4/7/2007 9:07:55 PM

Quote :

"why dont you tell us more about how the veto is the only way to obstruct someone and how bush has been pulling out his veto stick all over the place"

It's hard to "tell you more", when I didn't tell you that in the first place you degenerate.

You're approaching trikk and dnl levels of retardedness here pal.

Go smoke some more weed, it's the only thing you do properly.

4/7/2007 11:03:08 PM

what do retardedness and weed have to do with congress going on vacation and you bitching about it?

4/7/2007 11:11:01 PM

Those are the comments that make sure you continue losing this section day in and day out you water baby.

4/7/2007 11:12:09 PM

water baby? your insults dont even make sense anymore...just like your posts that attempt to have any relevance to the topic

let alone i dont know how talking about retardedness and weed in threads about completely unrelated topics have any bearing on anyone being pwnt or winning or losing threads...maybe i should overdose on steroids a few times to understand your way of "thinking"

4/7/2007 11:13:05 PM

You need to stick with the bald thing if you're gonna attempt to troll me you dipshit.

4/8/2007 12:23:31 AM

I win this thread.

4/8/2007 2:03:01 AM

^^sure thing, barry bonds

4/8/2007 3:30:37 AM

DonkTwista ftl

4/8/2007 3:52:13 PM

Quote :

"State409c Suspended "

ftl

4/8/2007 8:10:01 PM

battle meet war

4/8/2007 8:30:37 PM

Quote :

"TreeTwista10: ^^^^holy shit bridget you are one stupid girl his anecdote was one 6 year period compared to the last ~230 years...he didnt examine all past presidents and their political parties and compare those to the majority parties in congress during each of those presidents...his anecdote was simply pointing out part of ONE president's time in office...the "particular incident" was part of one president's time in office out of 43 total presidents"

I'm not stupid.

And I understand your point. But, in making your point, you used the word "anecdote" improperly. That's all I've been saying.

4/9/2007 1:46:36 PM

well im sorry i called you stupid

but you're the one who doesnt understand the meaning of the word 'anecdote'

4/9/2007 2:43:12 PM

It's so not an anecdote.

I can see why you might think it's an anecdote.

If John (random name) is trying to make a generalization about white people and using a few encounters he had with white people to support his generalization, you can call him out for presenting anecdotal evidence. But that argument doesn't translate to the situation in this thread. Yes, they're trying to argue based on an isolated block of six years (just like John was trying to argue based on a couple encounters with white people), but it's not the same thing...it's not an anecdote.

4/9/2007 2:54:56 PM

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2007-04-13T195357Z_01_N13210904_RTRUKOC_0_US-SECURITY-EAVESDROPPING.xml

4/15/2007 4:27:19 AM

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18854414/

Quote :

"Among other things, the 40-page Senate report reveals that two intelligence assessments before the war accurately predicted that toppling Saddam could lead to a dangerous period of internal violence and provide a boost to terrorists. But those warnings were seemingly ignored. In January 2003, two months before the invasion, the intelligence community's think tank — the National Intelligence Council — issued an assessment warning that after Saddam was toppled, there was “a significant chance that domestic groups would engage in violent conflict with each other and that rogue Saddam loyalists would wage guerilla warfare either by themselves or in alliance with terrorists.” It also warned that “many angry young recruits” would fuel the rank of Islamic extremists and "Iraqi political culture is so embued with mores (opposed) to the democratic experience … that it may resist the most rigorous and prolonged democratic tutorials." None of those warnings were reflected in the administration's predictions about the war. In fact, Vice President Cheney stated the day before the war, “Now, I think things have gotten so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.” A second assessment weeks before the invasion warned that the war also could be “exploited by terrorists and extremists outside Iraq.” The same assessment added, “Iraqi patience with an extended U.S. presence after an overwhelming victory would be short,” and said “humanitarian conditions in many parts of Iraq would probably not understand that the Coalition wartime logistic pipeline would require time to reorient its mission to humanitarian aid.” "

sounds like they were close to spot on.......and totally ignored.

5/25/2007 10:17:26 AM

It's like a tragic comedy of errors. I hate to toss out the 'I' word because I don't think it accomplishes much, but when you look how utterly gross this thing was mishandled, and how the American people were basically lied into war, I don't want the same group of cronies to be able to run this country for a single day longer if possible.

5/25/2007 10:25:24 AM

^i'd be one thing if they were genuine errors, but it looks more and more like they ignored people/info against what they wanted to do, and exaggerated/fabricated reasons for war.

if Clinton gets impeached for lying about some face, does the mounting evidence showing outright deception of the american people, in something so major as going to war, not scream for action?

5/25/2007 10:36:38 AM

is that a rhetorical question?

5/25/2007 10:39:07 AM

more or less.

5/25/2007 10:44:48 AM

Quote :

"predicted that toppling Saddam could lead to a dangerous period of internal violence and provide a boost to terrorists. ... “a significant chance that domestic groups would engage in violent conflict with each other and that rogue Saddam loyalists would wage guerilla warfare either by themselves or in alliance with terrorists.” “many angry young recruits” would fuel the rank of Islamic extremists and "Iraqi political culture ... may resist the most rigorous and prolonged democratic tutorials.""

this was EXACTLY the reasons why Bush the Elder did NOT invade Baghdad during Gulf I.

and these EXACT reasons were publicly repeated on numerous occasions by folks like CHENEY and RUMSFELD
at that time, in defense of Bush #41 against the neo-con critics who wanted to take out Saddam after liberating Kuwait.







[Edited on May 25, 2007 at 4:11 PM. Reason : goddamit, DNL, learn to post links correctly]

5/25/2007 4:09:23 PM

Bush will never get the support of liberals. Even if he cured cancer himself, brought world peace, and everyone could live like royalty...

6/2/2007 6:34:13 PM

^ At this point I would settle for some semblance of a political strategy/solution in Iraq. Given Bush's track record, however, I'm probably better hoping he cures cancer...

6/2/2007 11:36:15 PM

i boldface the word EXACTLY when i want to force people to believe anything i say! BOLDFACING words make my shit-ass weak arguments stronger!

6/3/2007 3:48:20 AM

^^lol yeah really

6/3/2007 4:18:29 AM

It's pretty sad you spent your Saturday night trolling the soap box Mister Twista.

6/3/2007 11:57:18 AM

yeah cause a few posts at 3:30am clearly means i spent my saturday night trolling soap box

i went out from about 9 to 3...oh but look at you, posting in the chavez thread at 1am...1am is a little more of a peak hour to be out on a weekend night than 3:30...plus who knows how many posts you made last night under your other screennames

another failed trolling attempt by the faggot alias

6/3/2007 2:44:31 PM

I was just getting my night started you weakling. Step your game up.

6/5/2007 5:00:18 PM

i have you on block

hey remember when you said you had me on block but you'd always respond?

lol fag

6/5/2007 5:05:13 PM

What stoner mumbo jumbo are you babbling about now? You came and posted at 3am after you got in from a night of drinking! Way cool!!!

6/5/2007 5:07:53 PM

you stayed in all night! way cooler!

6/5/2007 5:10:10 PM

I'm not the one that started in on joe_shmoe about what time he was on the wolf web posting you hypocrite.

6/5/2007 5:14:22 PM

me neither you forgetful faggot

6/5/2007 5:14:40 PM

Sure you were.

6/5/2007 5:17:51 PM

link?

I actually recall someone else calling ME out about MY posting times...I think it was you, er I mean State409c....and then I recall joe_schmoe making a comment to the effect of "oh i didnt know we were being judged on posting times, i'm screwed "

but you'd rather just troll, troll and troll some more rather than have a clue what the fuck you're talking about

6/5/2007 5:19:11 PM

TreeTwista10
411 4M3R1C4N
50736 Posts
user info
edit post

"i call people names like a little bitch once they call me out for not knowing anything at all except what time the next soundgarden concert is...as an old man environazi from seattle i like to think i know everything since i'm so damn old! i pretty much know everything there is to know even though i'm just a deranged old man posting on a college messageboard since at 3am pacific time where i am, im not satisfying my wife or taking care of my kid, i'm arguing with a "stoned retard" on a messageboard...even though my entire faggot city of seattle is stoned retards, i like to chat on the internet cause i'm an old bald man on a college messageboard"

- joe_homo

*awaits another mindless old man faggot rant from seattle where the hippies all supersaturate the entire atmosphere with weed smoke so even the old men who rely on college messageboards stay stoned and stuck on stupid*

6/3/2007 7:03:44 AM

6/5/2007 5:27:44 PM

now search through your posts to before that when I was called out for my posting times

6/5/2007 5:32:06 PM

I don't see anyone

TreeTwista10
411 4M3R1C4N
50742 Posts
user info
edit post

hey man we all love chavez up here in seattle, and obviously seattle is an accurate microcosm for the united states since the us is as retarded and liberal as we are here in seattle

hey btw i'm married with a kid but i'm posting on tww at 3am, i'm joe_homo

6/3/2007 7:13:10 AM

6/5/2007 5:43:53 PM

wrong post...find the one where somebody else called me out for my posting times like i asked...shoudlnt be much trouble since all you use TWW for is to troll

6/5/2007 6:58:30 PM

All I do is troll troll troll, which is why, other than the climate threads, my arguments and points are more well made and supported than anything you have ever posted on this web site that I have read.

Wait, was that a troll comment? I can't figure it out sense you think everything I ever post is trolling. If that is what it takes for you to avoid challenging my arguments....

6/5/2007 10:25:20 PM

FNC conservative pundint bashes Bush, Democrat sides with him -wtf?!

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_Analyst_Space_aliens_kidnapped_president_0604.html

Quote :

"The discussion led to an unlikely reversal of political positions, with conservative Fox political analyst Tammy Bruce describing the situation as "another glaring example of the growing incompetency of the Bush administration and his foreign policy," while Democratic strategist Bob Beckel concluded that "I support Bush on this ... and it's a strange day when I do that.""

6/6/2007 10:03:51 AM

Quote :

"Putin warned that Russia would take steps in response to U.S. missile shield "

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/06/bush.summit.ap/index.html

who the fuck else is Bush going to rattle his saber at and piss off while he's in office.

On another note I always hear that US's foreign policy throughout the late 20th century till today was "necessary" to maintain our standard of living and way of life. For example all the times the US covertly went into other countries in Latin America to depose of the leaders we disagreed with on politics. Yet I look at a lot of other 1st world wealthy countries around the world for example Australia, Scandinavia, Japan, etc and I do not see them doing any of this shit. Nor "coincidently" they are not on Al Quaeda's hit list. I guess the middle eastern terrorist hate our freedoms more then Norway's.

6/6/2007 11:23:11 AM

Apparenlty, other countries don't need to wage war to combat terrorism

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/06/12/indonesia.terror/index.html?eref=rss_world

Why no mention of this story on foxnews.com? Do they only trumpet victories against terror if it is favorable to the neoclowns?

6/12/2007 10:24:04 AM

I thought bush was hated throughout the world

why did he get such a kickass reception in a few of those european countries?

6/12/2007 10:26:03 AM

Guess you thought wrong.

6/12/2007 10:27:57 AM

just going on what I read here


I don't really like him

but I don't hate him

6/12/2007 10:30:26 AM

Just going on what you are reading? Maybe you should read a little more critically.

6/12/2007 10:31:42 AM

I hate it when you pretend to be stupid

maybe it's not an act though


you act like you've not seen the repeated "OMFG I HATE BUSH" threads in here


my point was that I was shocked to hear he received such a warm welcome in some of these countries

6/12/2007 10:34:11 AM