answer a fucking question and we would not have a problem with you

you troll your own shit

edit- well i would still want to kill you if i saw you in person but thats beside the point

[Edited on April 29, 2006 at 2:10 PM. Reason : its self defense]

4/29/2006 2:09:50 PM

that or i can't stand your racist views

OH WAIT

YOU'RE GOING TO COPY AND PASTE SOMETHING

I CAN JUST FUCKING FEEL IT IN MY FUCKING BONES YOU FUCKING SACK OF FUCKRAGS

4/29/2006 2:13:05 PM

dont you remember?
being called a racist is a compliment

4/29/2006 2:18:04 PM

oh yeah

he's totally at home humming "Nearer My God, to Thee"

4/29/2006 2:31:33 PM

what if god was just a big conspiracy theory of the jews?

4/29/2006 2:44:31 PM

WHERE ARE ALL THE AIRPORT VIDEOS OF THE "ARAB HIJACKERS"?

We have we only been shown two videos--one supposedly of Mohammed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari going through security, at a Portland, Maine airport, and another supposedly of four of the five "hijackers" about to get on Flight 77 at from Washington Dulles Airport. Why only those two videos? Shouldn't there be all these other videos of the "hijackers"? Why haven't we seen them? Doesn't the government want to prove it's case?


Video shows 9/11 hijackers at airport (re: Flight 77 at Washington Dulles)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/21/attacks.surveillance.video/


Video Allegedly Showing 9/11 "Hijackers" Security Check (re: Flight 77 at Washington Dulles)
http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/july2004/210704videoshows.htm

Quote :

"Comment: A grainy video found three years later that backs up the 'hijacker's myth. Another desperate attempt to create some kind of background to the official version of events that will support it in light of massive amounts of evidence to the contrary. Khalid al-Mihdhar who is supposedly shown in this video has been proven to be still alive, along with several other named 'hijackers'. This is the same government that gave us the fatty bin Laden video with the wrong nose and had the nerve to broadcast it in Times Square!"

9/11 Airport Surveillance Video
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers_video.html

Video allegedly from Washington Dulles Airport on September 11, 2001 showing four of five "hijackers" about to get on Flight 77 has no date and time stamp.


Flight 77 Dulles airport gate security video cam (many pictures from video)
http://911review.org/brad.com/DullesSecurityVideo.html


http://judicial-inc.biz/911_airport_videos.htm

Quote :

"Where are the airport videos? There are cameras at the ticket counter, Cameras at checkpoints, Cameras at boarding gates... Today’s airports have cameras everywhere So where are the hijacker’s videos? To date there has only been two video clips released – One of Mohammed Atta in Portland airport and another private showing to the survivors family of flight 77. At a time when most convenience stores across the country had security cameras we are told that Logan, Dulles and Newark didn't have cameras. Michael Taylor, president of American International Security Corp, says Newark and Dulles had cameras and the FBI confiscated them. FBI spokesman know nothing about this. [...] The truth All the airports involved had cameras and the FBI confiscated them. The simple truth is the hijackers weren’t Arabs. The first flight had a Capt in Israel’s Sayeret Matkal ( world’s premier anti hijacking unit) and second jet had a Mossad agent name Alovra Ahraham on that. 9/11 was an Israeli orchestrated operation all the way."

http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/airportvideo.html

Quote :

"No Video Shows Hijackers Boarding Targeted Flights Until 2004, the only video available to the public showing the alleged hijackers at any airport was a clip from a security camera at the Portland, Maine airport showing Mohammed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari going through security. The public has not been treated to any video showing any of the alleged hijackers at Boston Logan Airport, the origin of Flights 11 and 175, or Newark Airport, the origin of Flight 93. Video allegedly showing four hijackers boarding Flight 77 at Dulles Airport was released by a law firm representing some survivors' families in July of 2004, on the same day that the Kean Commission released its report. At a time when most convenience stores across the country had security cameras, Logan, a major international airport, supposedly had no security cameras in its departure lounges. According to Michael Taylor, president of American International Security Corp, the Newark airport does have video cameras in its departure lounges. So does Dulles International Airport. However, the FBI has refused to release any video from these airports that might prove that the alleged hijackers boarded the flights."

4/29/2006 2:45:13 PM

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

and the predictions come true.

4/29/2006 2:47:30 PM

Israel's Mossad: History of False Flag Attacks & Black Ops
http://judicial-inc.biz/False_Flags_summary.htm

Quote :

"The King David Massacre July 22, 1946 Jewish terrorists blew up a hotel, and killed 91 British soldiers, and blamed the atrocity on Arabs. When later caught, they said the British had a list of their Arab spies and were going to turn them over to the Palestinians. The goal of the False Flag was to pit the British against the Palestinians. [...] Lavon affair In 1954, Israeli agents working in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including a United States diplomatic facility, and left evidence behind implicating Arabs as the culprits. The ruse would have worked, had not one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to capture and identify one of the bombers, which in turn led to the round up of an Israeli spy ring [...] USS Liberty June 6th, 1967. Six fighters, three torpedo boats and two assault helicopters attacked the USS Liberty. There were 24 dead and 177 maimed. F-4 phantoms were enroute when President Johnson stopped the rescue. Israel's plan was to blame Egypt, and have the US retaliate against Egypt. [...] Khobar Towers ...1996 Khobar Towers was bombed. It housed an F-15 unit. Israel said it was done by Hezbollah, but US military investigators linked it to Mossad. [...] OKC Murrah Building ...1993 One of the Mossad's American arms, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), was concerned about the growth of Patriot movements such as Militias, so an attack was staged using a Timothy McVeigh patsy, who was out of Elohim City (Jewish-sponsored terror Mecca). The real brains behind the OKC bombing were Andreas Strassmeir and Daniel Spiegelman, who were/are both Jewish. The Zionists destroyed the Militia movement's credibility, and brought the FBI down on them. [...] Sept 11 .....2001 The most brazen of all Israeli attacks."

Many more examples of Israeli/Mossad false flags noted.

And realize this is just a summary of the attacks. It is admittedly not a detailed analysis. Also, some may say that this website "just blames everything on Israel." Well, the government and MSM blames every act of terrorism on "al-Qaeda" and "muslim terrorists", but when you actually investigate the facts, it turns out they are lying about virtually every incident and Zionism/Mossad is really behind most of the events.

4/29/2006 3:15:31 PM

TheDuke...i thought the soap box was for debate....is that not right??...Salis wont have a debate....why is he allowed just sit there and paste stuff all day long...anytime anyone tries to ask him questions he ignores them and calls them trolls...lock this crap


predicted salis response = "OMG CENSORSHIP!! YOU ARE TRYING TO SUPRESS THE TRUTH ABOUT ZIONIST/PNAC ALIEN (STRAWMAN!!!) EDOMITES" ...or...."YOU CAN SILENCE ME IF YOU WANT!!...THE MSM CANT EVEN DENY THE TRUTH ANYMORE....WE ARE THE MAJORITY!!!...THIS POLL OF 24 PEOPLE PROVES IT"

4/29/2006 3:22:38 PM

terminate him.

4/29/2006 3:58:52 PM

Quote :

"so you want theduke to censor viewpoints on 9/11 that differ from the government and MSM "official" story? hooray for viewpoint censorship!"

your viewpoints should be allowed

repeatedly posting them over and over and ignoring dissent should not

4/29/2006 4:08:57 PM

Quote :

"Israel's Mossad: History of False Flag Attacks & Black Ops"

Wow. Just wow.

That page contains absolutely no evidence. All of the claims are ludicrous. The part about the micro-nuke in Bali is probably the funniest.

The same site blames the Duke rape scandal, the McKinley assassination, and same sex bathrooms on jews.

Same questions....17 pages later...

No, bin Laden didn't have any motive to carry out the 9/11 attacks.

Its not like he issued a fatwah or anything urging muslims to kill americans.

Keep ignoring evidence, little buddy.

Quote :

"Text of Fatwah Urging Jihad Against Americans Published in Al-Quds al-'Arabi on Febuary 23, 1998 Statement signed by Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin; Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of the Jihad Group in Egypt; Abu- Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, a leader of the Islamic Group; Sheikh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan; and Fazlul Rahman, leader of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh ... All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries. This was revealed by Imam Bin-Qadamah in "Al- Mughni," Imam al-Kisa'i in "Al- Bada'i," al-Qurtubi in his interpretation, and the shaykh of al-Islam in his books, where he said "As for the militant struggle, it is aimed at defending sanctity and religion, and it is a duty as agreed. Nothing is more sacred than belief except repulsing an enemy who is attacking religion and life." On that basis, and in compliance with God's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies--civilians and military--is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty God, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God." This is in addition to the words of Almighty God "And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated and oppressed--women and children, whose cry is 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from thee one who will help!'" We -- with God's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson."

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

Could you please address these questions? I'm not trying to redirect or distract here. I'm genuinely curious. You made statements regarding all of these questions in this very thread, I would just like you to explain them before moving on. I questioned these claims when they were originally made, but you ignored me. Why won't you answer them?

Why didn't they build a pipeline in 1998? Why did they blow up their own african embassies and then launch a missile attack on Afghanistan? They were set to build a natural gas pipeline with the Taliban then. Why mess that up for no reason?

You don't believe that Afghanistan was invaded for the sake of a pipeline? Then why are you defending that theory so stubbornly?

You just said that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built. Now you're saying that the zionists wanted to prevent the building of a pipeline - just like how Iraq was invaded to secure the oil supply even though the zionists don't care about the oil supply. How do you reconcile all of the conflicting information that you spout off on here?

By the way, how did the zionists cause the US Civil War and the Revolutionary War?

I would also like to see some proof that Pearl Harbor was caused by the evil edomite zionists.

You have provided absolutely no evidence at all that the Rothschilds are the zionists at the top running world events. They were a prominent family that supported the creation of a jewish state, that is all. Please provide some evidence other than "Here are some rich jews!"

So why should anyone believe your rantings anyway You have admitted that you hate jews. As such, you are far from an impartial source when you blame jews for every problem in the world.

So when was the Israeli false flag terrorist attack in Washington state?

Why is it spamming if I repeat unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?

[Edited on April 29, 2006 at 5:27 PM. Reason : 666]

4/29/2006 5:26:47 PM

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

Quote :

"Why is it trolling if he repeats unanswered questions, but it's ok for you to repost the same article in the same thread five times?"

4/29/2006 5:31:02 PM

kekekekeke

4/30/2006 1:57:53 PM

Quote :

"TheDuke...i thought the soap box was for debate....is that not right??...Salis wont have a debate...."

Oh, right...I never debate anything. Just look back over the last 30 pages. Absolutely zero debate by me.

That's an absolute crock of shit...just like virtually everything else you post.

Quote :

"That page contains absolutely no evidence."

Duh. It's a summary, not a detailed analysis. And I said that in the initial post, troll, anticipating such a stupid comment from you. Thanks for not disappointing me.

5/1/2006 8:04:59 AM

Quote :

"Oh, right...I never debate anything. Just look back over the last 30 pages. Absolutely zero debate by me. "

exactly.

5/1/2006 9:39:18 AM

Was there a conspiracy to commit the 9/11 attacks, or do only "conspiracy nuts" believe that?

5/1/2006 9:46:46 AM

Quote :

"Absolutely zero debate by me"

couldn't have said it better myself

5/1/2006 9:49:56 AM

^^ oh so NOW you want to debate

too late for that shit, chief

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 9:50 AM. Reason : *]

5/1/2006 9:50:06 AM

So...do only muslim conspiracies exist, and jewish or government conspiracies are impossible?

I want to know how the 9/11 muslim conspiracy theorists think.

5/1/2006 9:54:11 AM

haha...stop trying to trap people...."sooo do only blah blah blah"


its the same tactic as "are you denying...."

just give it a rest

5/1/2006 9:58:22 AM

"trap" people by what?

logical arguments?

5/1/2006 9:59:25 AM

with you...there is no such thing


either way.....you need some new tactics dude...we are all wide to your old ones

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 10:00 AM. Reason : 666]

5/1/2006 9:59:58 AM

Is not the official story about freedom-hating Arabs with box-cutters pulling off 9/11 a conspiracy theory too?

5/1/2006 10:02:41 AM

ya know....whatever definition you have waiting to copy/paste after you get someoneto say "no, its not" ....is irrelevant....

the definition of conspiracy theory has nothing to do with it

5/1/2006 10:07:18 AM

The believers in the official fairy tale about evil genius bin Laden and 19 freedom-hating Arabs who go to strip clubs and leave Korans behind for us to find are the REAL "conspiracy theorist wackos."

5/1/2006 10:12:01 AM

way to come through with some stupid comment about the real story being a conspiracy theory just like i knew you would....good job

5/1/2006 10:13:09 AM

maybe you knew it because the "official" story IS a conspiracy theory

5/1/2006 10:15:10 AM

you're the punchline to a joke nobody wants to tell

5/1/2006 10:15:37 AM

are you mad that we all know about your tactics and that you had to come right out with your punchline???

5/1/2006 10:16:31 AM

blah blah blah

you've provided nothing but insults, smear and distraction tactics, and trolling

why don't you give us some evidence refuting my arguments if you can?

5/1/2006 10:17:57 AM

http://www.cnn.com
http://www.bbc.co.uk
http://www.msnbc.com

knock yourself out champ

5/1/2006 10:20:29 AM

haha....typical


lets look here....

http://www.foxnews.com
http://www.cnn.com
http://www.msnbc.com
http://www.bbc.com
http://www.anywherelesewithsomesense.com

any of those sites will have the correct information about 9/11....i have said this 1000 times....all the real evidence (which for some reason you think you have to look hard to find) contradricts your evidence....go back to the 9/11 report ...and dont think because you posted a few articles writtin by a few people that you have disproven the 9/11 report



haha...gg woodfoot

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 10:22 AM. Reason : asdf]

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 10:23 AM. Reason : 666]

5/1/2006 10:22:22 AM

I already used all those MSM sources above to refute the official fairy tale.

5/1/2006 10:27:52 AM

amazing...well....then you should know how to navigate them rather well...

now use them to find evidence that you think is wrong...odds are...we will says its right....AND odds are there will be alot more of it...

5/1/2006 10:29:18 AM

So all you can do is link me to the mainpage of MSM websites? You can't give me an article with evidence refuting the arguments I've made?

Virtually no evidence has been provided by the believers in the official conspiracy theory in this thread. Just a torrent of insults, smear and distraction tactics, and trolling. Now who's more believable here...a person who provides links, evidence, and information to back up their claims...or those who rant and throw around insults and provide little to no evidence? Just some food for thought.

5/1/2006 10:37:27 AM

we are more believable....im all for running a poll or something to see what people think about that...


lots of evidence has been provided from MSM sites (that hasent been filtered by prisonplanet....lord...he will probably get defensive about prisonplanet now)

5/1/2006 10:39:52 AM

Quote :

"we are more believable"

Why? Because you throw around more insults and don't provide any evidence to support your arguments?

Who are the real "nutcases" here? A person who's serious and provides links and evidence to back up his claims? Or those who type in all caps ranting and raving, spamming the thread with nonsense, insulting me and calling me names, and even saying they want to kill me?


Wait, I know...you're "more believable" because you parrot the government and MSM "official" line.

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 10:45 AM. Reason : ``````````]

5/1/2006 10:42:47 AM

no...we are more believable because we are logical...

you throw around nutcase conspiracy theories about zionist jews dressed like arabs who hang in strip clubs with korans doing the bidding of the rothschilds by manipulating president bush who is a member of a zionist puppet fraternity and a member of a zionist puppet secret organization called the skull and bones or whatever...

THAT is why we are more believable

and dont ever get on anyone for typing in all caps or bolding anything ever again...anyone who does that is just making fun of you, champ...because you are the originator

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 10:58 AM. Reason : 666]

5/1/2006 10:49:58 AM

i was totally typing something

then i remembered

this guy is a fucking fruitcake

and it doesn't matter what i type

its going to get the same response

so i decided to type this instead




and i figure i'll add this for fun:


THIS FUCKIN' GUY

5/1/2006 11:00:54 AM

So...you basically say you're "more believable" because your view is in line with the "official" view espoused by the MSM and government. And you say my view is "crackpot" and wrong because it is at odds with the "official" view espoused by the MSM and government.

5/1/2006 11:06:58 AM

no it's more believable because our view is more in line with a little thing called REALITY

i am well aware that you are not familiar with it

5/1/2006 11:09:46 AM

I'm curious...do you guys believe that Iraq really had WMDs and that Saddam and al Qaeda were connected?

How far does this blind trust of government and the MSM go?

5/1/2006 11:13:23 AM

Iraq had WMD yes. just look at when he gassed thousands of kurds with a nerve agent. or do u believe that is a lie?

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 11:17 AM. Reason : .]

5/1/2006 11:16:59 AM

So the Bush Administration didn't deliberately lie about and fabricate Iraq's "WMD threat" in order to mislead the nation into war in Iraq?

5/1/2006 11:18:34 AM

nope


get a new tactic man...because i suppose you have some groundbreaking evidence about a "senior" official saying he "thinks" that bush lied....please....do tell

[Edited on May 1, 2006 at 11:22 AM. Reason : 666]

5/1/2006 11:21:31 AM

oh good grief

president bush got a dui once
so now any time he drives, he has to be drunk

5/1/2006 11:24:13 AM

Quote :

"nope"

So those who still believe the "official" fairy tale on 9/11 are the same people who believe Bush didn't mislead the country on Iraq's "WMD threat" in order to go to war.

Wow. This is the level of denial we are dealing with folks.

Dude, you don't matter if you can't see the truth about the Iraq deception. You're living in la la land. Join a church where you can worship Bush or something.

5/1/2006 11:33:21 AM

we know iraq had wmd's

we have the receipts

5/1/2006 11:36:37 AM

Was Iraq really trying to buy Yellowcake Uranium from Niger too?

5/1/2006 11:38:49 AM