making the rounds on FB today:



[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 9:03 AM. Reason : 31]

10/30/2012 9:03:33 AM

^ the funny thing is, The Daily Show just recently ran a show about how campaigns create jobs because no campaign would be dumb enough to buy their merchandise from China.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-11-2012/our-new-election-economy

Welp! They were wrong, wtg Romney.

10/30/2012 9:12:21 AM

oh, but it was wrong.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/debunked-heres-the-explanation-for-the-made-in-china-romney-hat-youre-seeing-on-facebook/

10/30/2012 9:19:41 AM

Quote :

"You're right, it reeks of it. The left and right radicals are drowning out the moderates."

radical leftism is full out socialism. how much (pro)socialist noise are you hearing? none.

10/30/2012 12:50:30 PM

You must be def.

10/30/2012 12:52:58 PM

or maybe he just understands what socialism actually means (and not how it is used by Fox)

10/30/2012 12:53:40 PM

Those Chinese hats are not official either.

Yeah, its all Fox's fault. All Republicans love Fox and it where where they learn everything.
The depth and breadth of your ignorance is impressive.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 12:57 PM. Reason : ]

10/30/2012 12:55:54 PM

^^^jeez, you're a hack. you seriously want to claim there are all-out calls for socialism?

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 12:58 PM. Reason : ]

10/30/2012 12:57:52 PM

Examples of serious calls for socialism below:









...

10/30/2012 12:59:45 PM

10/30/2012 1:02:24 PM

Quote :

"^^^jeez, you're a hack"

name calling

bullet credibility watch

10/30/2012 1:04:36 PM

Quote :

"^^^jeez, you're a hack. you seriously want to claim there are all-out calls for socialism? "

And you are trying to put words in my mouth. You mentioned Socialism. I never once did.
Now why would you want to bring up Socialism?

As a side note. Its interesting that this storm is ripping through Democrat central and heading toward Obama's Kingdom of Chicago.

^^ Go home and call 211? Was he in Europe?

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM. Reason : ]

10/30/2012 1:29:10 PM

it's God's vengeance on all the stupid liberal hippies

10/30/2012 1:31:20 PM

Quote :

"name calling"

Jeez man, get off of it. Calling someone a "hack" isn't like calling them a "stupid" or "ugly". It means they're blindly biased toward one political party and against the other. Eaton Bush clearly is. It's apparent in every post he makes. So he's a "hack".

10/30/2012 1:34:47 PM

Quote :

"And you are trying to put words in my mouth. You mentioned Socialism. I never once did. Now why would you want to bring up Socialism?"

wtf are you talking about? Simonn pointed out that there isn't calls for full-out socialism, and you said "he must be deaf". I didn't put words in your mouth, and I didn't bring-up socialism.

Quote :

"As a side note. Its interesting that this storm is ripping through Democrat central and heading toward Obama's Kingdom of Chicago"

Holy shit, why is that "interesting"? See, that's something a hack would say.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 1:37 PM. Reason : ]

10/30/2012 1:36:06 PM

Quote :

"^^ Go home and call 211? Was he in Europe? "

lol I had to Google it myself. Apparently 211 is the number you call for community services information, including local relief aid information.

10/30/2012 1:51:27 PM

Bullet, you are everything the you accuse me of.
You are biased and by your own definition... a HACK.

10/30/2012 1:57:50 PM

he's rubber and you're glue, anything you say bounces off him and sticks to you

10/30/2012 1:59:45 PM

nah man, i'm pretty rational about politics and think they all pretty much suck. you seem to really think that the GOP is aweomse and the democrats pretty much suck in everything, and you often throw logic out the window when you defend the GOP or bash democrats.

10/30/2012 2:12:07 PM

Quote :

"nah man, i'm pretty irrational about politics"

FIFY.

10/30/2012 2:36:04 PM

bounce, stick

10/30/2012 2:39:04 PM

Show me one example where I'm irrational. One example of where I heap praise a politician or a political party. Show me man.

10/30/2012 2:39:22 PM

10/30/2012 2:50:10 PM

that's what i thought (hack )

10/30/2012 2:53:45 PM

I'm not going to search out your shit. Waste of time.

Obama hasn't delivered and I'm voting for the guy that has the best chance to get him out of office.
Simple as that. I've said it many times. It doesn't come from any kind of party loyalty although I really enjoy watching you flip out.. Fox news... bias... hack... socialism...

Thanks for the entertainment. Now go bite yourself.

10/30/2012 3:07:06 PM

What issue has he not delivered on that you think Romney will?

10/30/2012 3:08:28 PM

Total denial. Almost every one of your posts shows your blind bias.

10/30/2012 3:08:33 PM

as does yours

10/30/2012 3:10:17 PM

i've never even said who i'm voting for, guy.

10/30/2012 3:10:59 PM

Doesn't matter. You are biased. Everyone is biased. Why are you hung up on bias?
I am biased AGAINST Obama and so fucking what if I am?

10/30/2012 3:13:09 PM

So if you are voting against Obama because he has not delivered, what things has he not delivered on that you think Romney will?

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:17 PM. Reason : because if you don't think Romney will, you have an illogical position]

10/30/2012 3:16:53 PM

it's the blind part that's frustrating. you come across as the type of person that will take anything a democrat does (or doesn't do) and claim it's bad, even do mental gymnastics to explain to yourself how it's bad. If a Republican does (or doesn't do) the same things, you'll go out of your way to try spin it into something good. Like i said, logic out the window.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:22 PM. Reason : ]

10/30/2012 3:21:24 PM

you two talking logic, thats funny

10/30/2012 3:24:43 PM

wow man, you're really slinging out the zingers!!!1

10/30/2012 3:25:57 PM

So if you are voting against Obama because he has not delivered, what things has he not delivered on that you think Romney will?


signed,
not an Obama supporter

10/30/2012 3:29:20 PM

So, you have been just blindly making comments about my posts? You never read them?
Go back and read them and you will see why I'm not voting for Obama.
I you really don't support Obama then you already know.

10/30/2012 3:36:03 PM

so the answer then is nothing that Romney will do better

just anti-Obama

that's illogical


(The reasons I don't support Obama are NOT things that Romney will do better with, thus I am not a Romney supporter)


[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:39 PM. Reason : .]

10/30/2012 3:37:58 PM

Obama hasnt delivered on a number of his promises. Closing Gitmo, cutting the deficit, no lobbyist in his admin, ending the bush tax cuts, etc.

Not to mention what all was promised about the stimulus and the ACA which were BS.

For me spending and the economy are the two biggest issues for this country. We cant afford our current level of entitlements yet Obama keeps on expanding them. Not a recipe for long term success. I think Romney understands what it takes to run an economy, and govt doesnt help with adding more mandates that make doing business cost more. (both in the costs of employees but also man hours of complying with BS forms)

I like Romney's pledge to simplifying the tax code and cutting capital gains taxes. Do I think they will be able to cut the size of govt? no. Do I think they wont expand it like Obama has? yes, no doubt about it. They wont touch current debt drivers, which are entitlements. Without addressing those the debt will continue to grow, rapidly. THe boomers are coming on these programs and we have less younger peopel working or wanting to work too. Takign on water from both sides.

What are your reasons for voting for Obama? What makes you think his second term will be any better than his first? (which most not totally blind/biased will say has been very disappointing)

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:42 PM. Reason : .]

10/30/2012 3:41:44 PM

Thank you

Quote :

"Closing Gitmo, cutting the deficit, no lobbyist in his admin, ending the bush tax cuts, etc."

So which of these things will Romney be able to do? Zero from my count.

Quote :

"What are your reasons for voting for Obama?"

not voting for Obama

Obama/Romney support big government and big corporations and don't do enough to support poor and middle class americans.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:45 PM. Reason : both will increase government]

10/30/2012 3:43:43 PM

The point isnt do I think Romney will do what Obama promised, it is that Obama hasnt done much of what he was promising in 2008 to get elected.

I honestly think Romney has a better chance of cutting the deficit than Obama would if reelected. Preventing the ACA is huge in that regard. Of course both will release budgets that cut the deficit in 2100. haha I do think the republicans are much more likely to pass a balanced budget(hopefully an admendment) than the dems.

^You sound like you favor a libertarian view, then talk about the govt helping low and middle class. Doesnt make sense.

BTW, if given the choice of big govt or corporations, Ill choose the corps bc they cant legally take my money without my permission. And usually provide me with a service I want to boot.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM. Reason : .]

10/30/2012 3:48:40 PM

it is for Eaton Bush. He is voting against Obama because Obama hasn't gotten things done. But those things will not get done by Romney, so its it an illogical substitution

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:51 PM. Reason : repealing ACA would increase deficit per CBO and others]

10/30/2012 3:49:52 PM

Quote :

"if given the choice of big govt or corporations"

those are the same thing, who do you think writes the legislation and chooses the candidates? corporations.

10/30/2012 3:51:52 PM

Ok, I see what you are getting at. I thought you were just making a general statement. Sorry I jumped in.

^why you should support a limited govt. Corporations invest in govt because they have the power to force the people to do things. Money will continue to pour into govt as long as we accept that that is acceptable. The ACA will only make this worse. We now have the govt forcing everyone to buy a product from a private company, if you refuse they will take your money and hand it over to them anyway. Now what business wouldnt favor that? Forget spending millions on ADs, spend it on the unlimited power of politicians.

[Edited on October 30, 2012 at 3:55 PM. Reason : .]

10/30/2012 3:52:12 PM

^the only way Romney is going to cut the deficit is if congress goes into sequestration.

His Economic policy is 100% smoke and mirrors. If you take even an hour to look at what he is promising, the numbers don't even come close to adding up, even in a best case scenario.

And all those entitlements that Obama has out in place? Guess which ones Romney will get rid of? None of em.

The really sad part about the whole thing is that regardless of who is elected, the economy will continue to recover in the short term. The ramifications of this election won't be felt for 15-20 years from now.

Much like we are paying the piper today for the horrible policies of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.

10/30/2012 3:58:00 PM

even if romney loses, we'll still probably get his promised 12 million jobs in 4 years: http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/10/26/163719000/economists-romneys-12-million-jobs-target-realistic-even-if-he-loses

10/30/2012 3:59:42 PM

So Dtownral is not only a Vulcan he can see the future.

10/30/2012 4:04:11 PM

Quote :

"who do you think writes the legislation and chooses the candidates? corporations."

LOL!!!

Sequestration. Why is that the only route to deficit cutting?

10/30/2012 4:06:58 PM

what things has Obama not delivered on that you think Romney will?

10/30/2012 4:07:04 PM

you're not helping your case eaton

10/30/2012 4:08:20 PM

Noen the ACA is one for sure. Stopping that will lower the deficit.

I also think eliminating the capital gains tax will create incentives for people to invest their money, this creates economic activity among job creators. So does lowering taxes. Which will lead to more hiring.

I also dont think romney will continue to expand food stamps eligibility levels, and other such programs either.

10/30/2012 4:09:11 PM