she did plenty of political gaming of her own

12/26/2016 9:54:30 PM

Quote :

"This is a perfect example of how conservatives are going to keep repeating lies in an attempt to rewrite history. The server wasnt illegal,"

irorny is ironic

Quote :

"Comey said the investigation found: + 110 emails in 52 email chains that contained classified information at the time that they were sent + 8 chains of emails that contained information which was considered “Top Secret” + 36 email chains that held information considered “secret” + 8 other email chains that held “confidential” information "

again, saying that you lost because you got caught as an excuse then trying to blame the people that released the correct info is ridiculous

[Edited on December 27, 2016 at 7:03 AM. Reason : s]

12/27/2016 6:58:31 AM

Comey then proceeded to dismiss all charges against her, twice. What was it, five? (I lost track) congressional investigations over the last 3 years that also produced.....absolutely nothing.

[Edited on December 27, 2016 at 8:02 AM. Reason : we've probably spent ~$50 million in 3 years investigating Hillary, and produced nothing substantial]

12/27/2016 7:46:28 AM

Quote :

"again, saying that you lost because you got caught as an excuse then trying to blame the people that released the correct info is ridiculous"

Also, Obama to the day he leaves office has been naive to the GOP and gave those assholes the benefit of the doubt. He was too nice the whole time. He specifically decided to sit on the Russia information solely because he didn't want to potentia impact the election. If he was an asshole like Rudy it could have made a difference.

[Edited on December 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM. Reason : Opinion not fact]

12/27/2016 8:54:37 AM

^ if he was an asshole like Rudy, Hillary would be in prison

12/27/2016 9:16:27 AM

^^^Nothing substantial? Depends on whose side you're own. I'd call losing the election pretty substantial for Trump supporters.

12/27/2016 9:39:04 AM

^ you lost the focus of the comment - nothing substantial to convict her of wrongdoing. (I don't disagree - just being picky )

^^ /old

[Edited on December 27, 2016 at 9:46 AM. Reason : .]

12/27/2016 9:44:38 AM

I understand that - but you know and I know that it was never about actual wrongdoing.

12/27/2016 9:49:04 AM

All you need to know is that the congressional committees investigating Hillary were closed literally days after the election. If you want to keep believing this was about anything other than politics, than that's on you.

12/27/2016 1:02:33 PM

That's what I'm saying.

12/27/2016 3:32:18 PM

democrats are upset over folks playing political games

lawl

12/27/2016 6:01:36 PM

^ obviously both sides play games, but the GOP just happens to be way better at them currently. props and stuff.

12/27/2016 8:08:53 PM

a politician playing political games is not the same as the head of the FBI playing political games, stop being a moron

12/27/2016 9:27:03 PM

well, he was appointed by a democrat

12/27/2016 9:36:00 PM

Quote :

"a politician playing political games is not the same as the head of the FBI playing political games, stop being a moron"

12/27/2016 9:55:46 PM

Quote :

"All you need to know is that the congressional committees investigating Hillary were closed literally days after the election. If you want to keep believing this was about anything other than politics, than that's on you."

All you need to know is that the emails belonging to Hillary were acid washed literally days after the congressional supoena. If you want to keep believing this was about anything other than politics, then that's on you.

All you need to know is that the sexts belonging to Anthony Weiner were discovered literally days before the FBI reopened the investigation. If you want to keep believing this was about anything other than sexting 15 year olds, then that's on you.

[Edited on December 28, 2016 at 1:26 AM. Reason : lol]

12/28/2016 1:25:48 AM

Actually, you need to check your FBI timeline. Weiner and Abedin's shit was seized by the FBI at the very beginning of October. The FBI sat on Abedin's computer (while leaking info about it to Kallstrom or Giuliani) for three weeks before Comey decided he should let everyone know, which was just conveniently 11 days out from the election.

12/28/2016 8:35:13 AM

12/28/2016 4:44:35 PM

Quote :

"Actually, you need to check your FBI timeline. Weiner and Abedin's shit was seized by the FBI at the very beginning of October. The FBI sat on Abedin's computer (while leaking info about it to Kallstrom or Giuliani) for three weeks before Comey decided he should let everyone know, which was just conveniently 11 days out from the election."

Fair enough. Comey was damned either way though. If the FBI was politicized they would have recommended charges, or they would have not handed out immunity like candy with no prosecution.

12/29/2016 10:48:31 PM

https://twitter.com/odavis_/status/839456935329976321

This is actually fascinating. She got so far away from what she was good at (policy).

It always seemed that trump was off topic but his ad-shares (his own and his PACs) were so much more policy based than hers. Totally lost the plot...

3/8/2017 9:41:50 AM

I'd like to see how they compiled that chart.

Does "we're gonna build a wall and Mexico is gon' pay for it!!!" Count as a policy discussion? I'd argue no.

3/8/2017 9:45:39 AM

Quote :

"She got so far away from what she was good at (policy)."

What makes you think she was good at policy? What in the hell did she accomplish policy wise?

She had to avoid policy because it was a winning issue for Trump just based on the outsider/insider dynamic. Even for policy she just had planned, Trump would say "you've been in politics for 30 years, why haven't you done it yet". She was also in an awkward spot of defending unpopular Obama policies like the ACA, while trying to pander to wallstreet and Bernie bots at the same time.

3/8/2017 9:56:41 AM

She actually talked policy a lot in her campaign speeches, economic policy more than anything else. Yes, her ad buys were disproportionately focused on attacking Trump rather than promoting policy, which is what that chart shows. I think the big difference and mistake they made from Obama in 2012 was not focusing on a specific economic attack which tied into their campaign's larger economic message. Portraying Romney as a corporate raider went right along with Obama's message about economic fairness. That's why it was effective and further reinforced by the 47% video.

3/8/2017 11:23:33 AM

She talked a lot about different policies in her $500k speeches to bankers.

3/8/2017 12:09:17 PM

An interesting video, and the analysis of the results on the audience was completely unexpected by those who put it together.

"An actress portrays Donald Trump and a man plays Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential debates, in a play organized by NYU professors to discuss gender in politics."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yC7-JsR2Fk

3/8/2017 10:05:00 PM

Quote :

"“When a man [re-creates Clinton’s performance],” said Salvatore, “it feels like a lot of mansplaining.”"

lmao

A bunch of leftist academics try to show Clinton lost because of sexism by swapping genders, then they reveal their sexism by hating on the man... again.

Funny the only ones having their minds changed by this are leftists... its almost as if being obsessed with identity politics isn't a smart way to view the world.

3/9/2017 10:57:57 AM

Quote :

"you've been in politics for 30 years, why haven't you done it yet"

Which is fucking stupid, but dummies ate that shit up.

3/9/2017 12:44:45 PM

clinton camp did the same thing to bernie

3/9/2017 12:46:06 PM

It's almost like senators can't implement policy on their own.

It makes only slightly more sense than asking why Trump wasn't just president thirty years ago if he had ideas.

3/9/2017 1:05:20 PM

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=8889

Quote :

" Gender-swap experiment shows Hillary even less likable as a man An experiment designed to reveal gender bias by reenacting the presidential debates with the candidates’ genders reversed found that Hillary Clinton would have been even less likeable as a man. The two NYU professors who designed the experiment were "unsettled" to discover that audience members actually found Trump's style more endearing when it came from a woman. One female audience member even remarked that she found the male version of Clinton "very punchable" because he smiled so much."

3/9/2017 9:17:28 PM

^, see ^^^^^ above.

anyway, why is this thread still coming up?

Oh, and this:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/11/proof-hillary-clinton-ran-the-most-deplorable-presidential-campaign-in-modern-history/

3/11/2017 10:05:05 PM

There was a study that came out about policy which is why it was bumped. Went two days without a post until you did it again, though.

She may have been a terrible candidate but she is so embedded in your brain it's scary.

3/12/2017 9:16:23 AM

lol, "MOST DEPLORABLE!!!111"

3/12/2017 12:37:32 PM

Quote :

"anyway, why is this thread still coming up?"

hard to say...perhaps because you keep bumping it.

3/12/2017 1:21:07 PM

Quote :

"She may have been a terrible candidate but she is so embedded in your brain it's scary."

kdogg(c) post 12/29/2016 4:44:35 PM

next recent post

NyM410 post 3/8/2017 9:41:50 AM

Quote :

"There was a study that came out about policy which is why it was bumped. Went two days without a post until you did it again, though."

bigly hypocritical

believe me

3/12/2017 1:38:17 PM

Quote :

"kdogg(c) post 12/29/2016 4:44:35 PM next recent post NyM410 post 3/8/2017 9:41:50 AM"

nice sample size of one! where did i say you were the only one who bumps it?

[Edited on March 12, 2017 at 1:42 PM. Reason : and you just bumped while asking why it keeps getting bumped lol]

3/12/2017 1:41:38 PM

Srsly dude....stop bumping

3/12/2017 9:57:43 PM

Yea why are you bumping this thread tho

3/14/2017 12:22:48 AM

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-clinton-facebook-idUSKBN18R34C

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/31/15719342/hillary-clinton-2016-excuses

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/31/bitter-hillary-clinton-is-now-blaming-inept-dnc-for-election-loss-video/

And finally...COMEDY GOLD:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0EYktj412w

Quote :

"Clinton: I take responsibility for every decision I made but they're not why I lost"

5/31/2017 6:11:51 PM

hard to tell if she is really delusional and believes that or its just spin. doesnt really matter either way tho

5/31/2017 6:26:00 PM

well all democrats believe that so yeah....

5/31/2017 7:53:32 PM

Not really but again you are incapable of any nuance at all.

5/31/2017 9:47:09 PM

I love how it's always the conservatives that keep bumping this thread.

You're the one's that are keeping here relevant.

6/1/2017 7:07:53 AM

Yeah, outside of my GF who REALLY likes Hillary, almost every D I've talked to is ready for Clinton to move on. Why she's continuing to make statements like this blows my mind. What good does it do?

Like, sure, when you lose an election by that slim a margin its hard to pick any one thing and say "that's why I lost" but that means the news coverage/email scandal/benghazi is to blame just as much as how poor a candidate she was.

For as smart as she is, you'd think she'd have a self-realization of "damn, everything I say is being blown out of proportion and is a lightning rod of hate for half the country, maybe I should keep my mouth shut."

So for someone who supported you in the primary's/general, please go away.

6/1/2017 8:30:20 AM

^^ it's easy to see why. Winning the election is Trump's only noteworthy accomplishment, so he and his lackies bring up the election as much as possible.

6/1/2017 8:41:58 AM

Yeah, when your presidency is filled with gaffe after bumble after failure, all you have left is to say "but we won, neener neener neener"

6/1/2017 8:46:06 AM

^ LOL

But just think, four more posts and we can have a fresh start on a failed Topic!

6/1/2017 7:26:35 PM

of all the many accomplishments Trump's had in his short time in office, his victory at the polls is the one that burns liberals the most. That's why Trump and others keep bringing it up. Without that victory, nothing else he did would be possible, such as:

placing Gorsuch in the supreme court
federal hiring freeze
withdrawing from TPP
enforcing immigration laws
cracking down on antidumping and countervailing trade practices
pushing through Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, among others
focusing NASA on space instead of climate change
cutting funding to sanctuary cities

6/2/2017 12:34:51 PM

Lol Gorsuch to the supreme court was 100% Mitch McConnell's accomplishment, not Trump's.

Quote :

"cutting funding to sanctuary cities"

Oh yah? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/us/judge-blocks-trump-sanctuary-cities.html

Quote :

"federal hiring freeze"

Oh yah? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/us/judge-blocks-trump-sanctuary-cities.html

6/2/2017 12:48:08 PM

set em up

6/2/2017 1:01:20 PM