I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 1:07:14 PM

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 1:07:14 PM

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 1:07:14 PM

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM. Reason : oic how u do it]

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM. Reason : shit don't work in firefox]

1/4/2009 1:07:14 PM

i'm using firefox and its working fine

1/4/2009 1:08:40 PM

Quote :

"stop hitting the damn post reply button, you dang moe-rons!"

SRSLY. If it stalls after hitting 'post reply!', then you don't need to keep hitting it. It will either post your reply eventually, or it will give you an 'oh shit' error

1/4/2009 1:10:13 PM

the dumbasses will hit flood control soon, and we'll just hope they don't have aliases.

1/4/2009 1:11:20 PM

i wonder if the mods will suspend for this

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM. Reason : ...]

if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM. Reason : .]

1/4/2009 1:12:18 PM

O RLY?

1/4/2009 1:12:43 PM

i have 2 aliases, and i would've hit flood control anyways

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 1:13:10 PM

lulz

1/4/2009 1:14:22 PM

1/4/2009 1:14:41 PM

I was pissed when i woke up that this was almost 4 pages, but i'm not anymore

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 1:15:26 PM

why

1/4/2009 1:16:39 PM

why

1/4/2009 1:20:39 PM

SO TUFF

1/4/2009 1:21:34 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

1/4/2009 2:06:17 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

what

1/4/2009 2:06:17 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

1/4/2009 2:06:17 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

what

i

1/4/2009 2:06:17 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

1/4/2009 2:06:17 PM

mean.

no ghost editing too!

1/4/2009 2:06:43 PM

evan: thinking TWW cares about this type of shit since 2007.

1/4/2009 2:08:48 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

1/4/2009 2:12:19 PM

Quote :

"if not i would like to have an official thread for this, i want to see if its possible to get different messages with the same time stamp"

yes it is,

see

1/4/2009 2:12:19 PM

stop

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM. Reason : picking on evan]

1/4/2009 2:22:08 PM

sorry

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM. Reason : .]

1/4/2009 2:24:34 PM

me too

1/4/2009 2:25:32 PM

i mean premies could just ghost edit and fool most people

I'm Big Business and i approved this message.

1/4/2009 2:26:13 PM

whatchu talkin bout willis

1/4/2009 2:26:32 PM

whatchu talkin bout willis

1/4/2009 2:26:32 PM

I'm Big Business and i approved this message

1/4/2009 2:27:40 PM

ok thanks pilgrimshoes

1/4/2009 3:26:32 PM

i am satisfied with the way this thread turned out

good job, tww

1/4/2009 3:29:59 PM

^fag

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

my b

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM. Reason : sorry]

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

^fag

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

dnl ur a fag

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM. Reason : .]

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

2

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM. Reason : 2 is all i said...2]

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

it definitely added about 8 or so posts

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM. Reason : .]

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

should have been no more than 2

[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM. Reason : stupid ]

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

^fag

1/4/2009 3:45:23 PM

lulz

1/4/2009 3:46:14 PM

lulz

1/4/2009 3:46:38 PM