^^
...sad, sad troll.

1/29/2009 7:28:46 AM

you're never going to see normal, self-assured people buying into the multiple partner bullshit, only sweaty mouth breathers who think poorly of themselves.

1/29/2009 7:39:28 AM

Quote :

"going to see"

Quote :

"People like you are why most people keep their "deviations" under wraps."

1/29/2009 7:40:45 AM

here is a statistic i would like to see, percentage of people in polyamorous relationships on some kind of anti-depressants. i'm guessing its 190%.

1/29/2009 7:42:37 AM

Quote :

"190%."

Translation: "I'm a troll. But I got pwned, so now I'll try to be funny."

1/29/2009 7:53:38 AM

YOU CAN'T JUST ARGUE THAT SHIT Willy Nilly

1/29/2009 7:54:54 AM

1/29/2009 8:00:04 AM

Quote :

"i didn't realize that people gave formal invitations to be their "girl on the side"."

Quote :

"this screams success"

Quote :

"^^ if she knows about the girlfriend then she is just as guilty"

agreed. did this once and I always thought I was a bad person for doing it, not quite as bad as him cause she thought he loved her, but still.

1/29/2009 9:02:45 AM

as long as ambrosia is a cheerleader for this, my points will continue to sting with truth

1/29/2009 9:34:00 AM

^
ad hominem much? (you are so fucking dumb)

Quote :

"truth"

The way you used this word is reminiscent of how certain christians use it.
Are all of these opinions about love and relationships that you presented in this thread even partially based on christian teachings and/or christian faith? It would be a lot easier for all of us to completely discredit your views if you admitted that they're all based on illogical beliefs and mythical beings....

2/2/2009 11:12:01 AM

its not ad hominem when its true

2/2/2009 11:57:00 AM

^^WAT?

2/2/2009 11:57:48 AM

this thread is still going on?

2/2/2009 11:58:04 AM

was that guys tirade about christianity aimed at me?

2/2/2009 12:28:42 PM

that's what I was trying to figure out

2/2/2009 12:32:40 PM

Quote :

"its not ad hominem when its true"

You don't know what ad hominem is, do you?
(The veracity of an argument is completely independent of an instance of ad hominem..)

Quote :

"(you are so fucking dumb)"

Quote :

"tirade about christianity"

actually, it was a question with speculations, not a tirade -- but yes, it's for you. I don't guess you care to answer...."Are all of these opinions about love and relationships that you presented in this thread even partially based on christian teachings and/or christian faith?"

2/2/2009 12:33:11 PM

Jesus hates people that have sex.

2/2/2009 12:33:18 PM

^^^^^

2/2/2009 1:00:50 PM

I think this kid tried to use a basic logical fallacy to sound smart., we all know what ad hominem is

[Edited on February 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM. Reason : oh and nothing I have said is based on religion, nice red herring]

2/2/2009 2:46:09 PM