^This is relevant to my interests.

6/18/2010 2:03:41 AM

people who decide to leave their sons intact are setting them up for a life of pain and ridicule

it ain't easy being cheesy

6/18/2010 10:07:14 AM

Quote :

"Several studies and retrospectives have shown that there are a fair number of men who feel rather violated and betrayed by their parents."

a fair number of men are idiots

6/18/2010 10:15:30 AM

did anybody make the seinfeld "no personality" joke yet? im not going to check through 4 pages of cock talk

6/18/2010 10:17:26 AM

^ interesting point



uncut

6/18/2010 10:30:10 AM

oh several pages ago...

Quote :

" mean what sane person would go through that procedure as an adult? "

apparently in South Korea it's done to middle-schoolers.. why the hell they wait til then, I have no idea.

Some TV station a year ago or so decided to follow this poor kid around as he was going to get it done, etc. No, they didn't show the surgery, but... geez. I was like "kid, tell your parents to shove off"

6/18/2010 11:40:32 AM

Quote :

"I do not want to be with a guy that has no body fat on him...first off cause I'm a fat chick myself, so I'm gonna feel all insignificant in the situation and second because I don't wanna fuck around with a douche*"

hahahahah classic . self image problems much?

6/18/2010 11:53:41 AM

Quote :

"he is doomed to have all kinds of insecurities about it and problems in the bedroom as many girls will be surprised and not like it, and if any of his friends find out they will make fun of him"

what a crock of shit. I proudly wear a cock turtleneck, and with college having been an all you can eat pussy buffet, I never had a single chick show the repulsion you people predict will happen. A few asked question in the realm of "I just want to avoid hurting you when I play with it."

As far as I can tell that was the extent of the impact I experienced as an uncut male. Had I been cut, i would not have felt violated or anything either. It's one of those minor things that people make way too big of a deal about, because they have no idea what the hell they're talking about.

6/18/2010 12:05:03 PM

No offense, but it is probably way more acceptible / expected from someone of a cultural background other than American.

Just saying, it probably wasn't as much of a surprise factor with you as it would have been with a preppy white kid.

[Edited on June 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM. Reason : a]

6/18/2010 12:08:59 PM

I can hear the conversation:

Hi son, instead of doing a painless procedure that you will not remember - I`m going to open you up to all the following conditions. I really would not want to infringe on your BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.

http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/penile_disorders/hic_disorders_of_the_penis.aspx

Fingers crossed you don;t get the penile cancer - daddy would feel bad on that one.

6/18/2010 12:30:31 PM

women making decisions about a man's foreskin itt

6/18/2010 12:35:04 PM

good point

6/18/2010 12:35:54 PM

Quote :

"I never had a single chick show the repulsion you people predict will happen"

did any of the chicks see it while it was flaccid? [no homo]

6/18/2010 12:55:14 PM

probably 5 of them i'd guess... basically the ones that were girlfriends vs the one time hookups.



people learning way too much about BobbyDigital's genitalia ITT

6/18/2010 1:01:37 PM

Quote :

" OR "

6/18/2010 1:03:40 PM

I think I made a pretty good point with my last post

6/18/2010 1:03:57 PM

yeah, i've actually never considered the cultural thing. that might definitely have something to do with it.

6/18/2010 1:09:45 PM

i, also, have never seen any repulsion from a girl who is seeing my penis for the first time. erect or flaccid, the turtleneck doesn't seem to matter to them.

6/18/2010 1:21:29 PM

uncut checking in

6/18/2010 1:21:54 PM

uncut

it seems there are more uncut people on TWW than cut. Somebody do a tally, i'm too lazy.

6/18/2010 1:37:31 PM

^ i highly doubt that is the case

6/18/2010 1:51:31 PM

page 4skin.

6/18/2010 1:54:41 PM

nm

[Edited on June 18, 2010 at 1:56 PM. Reason : a]

6/18/2010 1:56:38 PM

I was late, but it was Netstorm's duty.

6/18/2010 1:57:26 PM

functionally and cosmetically uncircumcised, albeit with a slightly shorter foreskin. Reasons may include the removal of a small tight band of skin that makes retraction impossible or difficult, or reducing a long foreskin to a more average one.

PARTIAL
A partial circumcision reduces the foreskin to one which is at the short end of the range of foreskins. When flaccid, part of the head remains exposed and the meatus is almost never covered.

LOOSE
A loose circumcision will fully expose the glans most of the times, but sometimes will still get covered partially when the penis shrinks below its normal flaccid state. Some loose skin remains bunched up against the rim when soft. Once erect, the skin is not extremely tight and can still be moved a fair amount. There are cases where to allow for the growth in the erection, the penis will have to appear loosely circumcised when fully flaccid. In a loosely circumcised male, the loose skin behind the rim will "hide" the shape of the rim of head in underwear making the circumcision status less obvious when in underwear or speedos.

MODERATE
This is your "average" circumcision. The head never gets covered, except just a bit when penis is extremely small (very cold water for instance). Some skin may bunch up at the rim, but will generally be of lesser diameter than the rim of the glans. Once hard, movement of the skin depends on how much the penis grows. Generally the male would still be able to pull some skin to the rim of head, but not over it.

TIGHT
In a tight circumcision, there is little of no loose skin on the shaft, thus making the shape of the head very prominent in underwear or speedos. When hard, there is little or no movement of the shaft skin which is very thin and tight.

6/18/2010 6:54:55 PM

6/19/2010 3:34:28 PM

gross

6/21/2010 1:03:43 PM