see, this is why we need this shit, I cant remember if I like you or if you are a stupid troll bitch

2/28/2011 8:51:52 PM

I heard qntmfred is conducting interviews for the new ST mod opening

This is how I plan on arriving

3/2/2011 2:42:36 PM

I was going to start a Sports Talk mod search thread. Since there isn't an opening it's still cool to have a search, right?

3/2/2011 2:52:08 PM

I've only had one year of poor results though, not five.

3/2/2011 3:42:59 PM

But you've been five times as bad.

Think Cam Cameron for the Dolphins.

3/2/2011 3:53:18 PM

Internet time is 5 times real time. Youre on the clock.

3/2/2011 3:56:54 PM

3/2/2011 4:06:09 PM

hahahaha

3/2/2011 5:38:40 PM

3/2/2011 5:55:48 PM

That's quality stuff right der.

3/2/2011 6:00:46 PM

For the record, I'm driving, and Ernie's loading up on rocks

3/2/2011 6:02:18 PM

Sometimes there just aren't enough rocks

3/2/2011 6:04:57 PM

LOL at the truck looking like its tilted on Jaybee's side.

3/2/2011 6:10:06 PM

here's a point that hasn't been mentioned, but needs to be addressed:

do you really want your ST mod to be a guy who uploads a new picture of himself about once/week, and is making the same face in the same room every single time?

i'm not sure that i do.

that said, my vote stays w/ Ernie for mod.

3/2/2011 6:19:47 PM

perhaps a mod in charge of Preventative Troll Maintenance?

3/2/2011 10:01:45 PM

i'm gonna hijack this thread for this hypothetical scenario

for the sake of argument

which 5 users would you say contribute most negatively to the harmonious functioning of Sports Talk, and whose suspension would result in a more civil, engaging and interesting environment for conversation?

3/2/2011 10:13:07 PM

This should get fun

:popcorn gif:

3/2/2011 10:19:51 PM

what are you asking for computer guy

3/2/2011 10:33:46 PM

QNTMFRED...YOUR COMPANY'S COMPUTER GUY!

3/2/2011 10:38:46 PM

look, just because i'm a guy, work for a company, and do stuff with computers does not make me a company computer guy

^^ read the post, son. if you need a tl;dr then i guess "which 5 users do you think need suspenders"

3/2/2011 11:11:02 PM

to me i would get rid of milkboner to me

3/2/2011 11:12:24 PM

your submission does not count unless it includes 5 valid users

3/2/2011 11:30:08 PM

the five users that i can't tell the difference between. one is Milkboner. i think Bullet is one.

and HOOPS MALONE.

3/2/2011 11:36:10 PM

1. face
2. Bullet
3. adder
4. Milkboner
5. aaronburro

matter of fact banning 1 and 5 would probably be a service to the entirety of TWW and not just sports talk

3/2/2011 11:41:02 PM

I think HOOPS is fine, he doesn't post enough to screw up any discussions

3/2/2011 11:41:40 PM

hey you guys want to see a sweet campus forum that aaronburro authored back on 07? done.

Walk-ons are competent
Thank you so much for insulting the efforts of the players on the men's basketball team. I'm sure they will have a blast over the next couple days trying to figure out which "6 or 7" of them are "competent." It's so kind to refer to walk-ons as incompetent members of the team. Walk-on players practice just as hard, and they put in the same amount of effort as their counterparts with scholarships. Furthermore, no one should call players like Bryan Nieman or Dennis Horner incompetent. Nieman played a huge role in our victory over Virginia in the tournament, hitting two crucial and back-breaking three-point shots, as well as being exceptionally scrappy on the defensive end of the floor. Horner also made huge contributions to our ACC tournament run. The fact is, we should applaud our walk-ons for their efforts this season. We should applaud them for their dedication and work. And we should applaud them for doing all of this without being offered scholarships. Please, don't denigrate their efforts or even begin to suggest that they aren't competent.

Bryan Burroughs Senior, Computer Science

3/2/2011 11:46:17 PM

submission or not, i have opined

3/2/2011 11:51:25 PM