Quote :

"Full name Titan Stadium Location 800 North State College Blvd. Fullerton, CA 92834 Coordinates Coordinates: 33.886646°N 117.886992°W Opened 1992 Owner California State University, Fullerton Surface Natural grass Scoreboard Yes Construction cost $10.2 million Capacity 10,000 Executive Suites No Field dimensions 75x120 yards"

Ron Paul will be speaking here tonight

5/2/2012 12:56:39 PM

So if he fills this one that means he wins California, right?

5/2/2012 1:19:37 PM

He's already filled 3 of these in california

This will just make 4


Can you please show me Romney's crowd? PLEASE. I beg you

5/2/2012 2:10:58 PM

so are ppl in NC voting for Paul in the early voting right now?

5/2/2012 2:47:05 PM

I did.

5/2/2012 2:52:55 PM

I want to be at the real Ron Paul committee / delegates...cause I want to say screw youmomthe romneyncrowd

5/2/2012 4:19:31 PM

Who in the world is Nina Grabiel?

http://youtu.be/FtN6UmffUy4

5/2/2012 6:54:34 PM

Quote :

"she forced youtube account ronpaul2008dotcom to be shut down based on her bogus copyright claims, and she acts like she is a ron paul supporter? so much for liberty and respect i would say she is def either cia or she is? just an insecure person"

lmao

5/2/2012 6:57:39 PM

Nina is a ron paul supporter? Right... doesn't add up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDnRNItxSy4

5/2/2012 7:01:04 PM

Quote :

"Are you seriously trying to use Florida, in the 2000 election......as an example of voter suppression..... ...done by Democrats?"

there was certainly a massive attempt at it. show me where the other voter suppression was? people that couldn't fill their ballots out correctly and had their ballots DQed, as specified in state law? or are you thinking of the Democrats who only wanted to recount one county in the entire state, with rules completely different from the rest of the state? Or maybe it was where Democrats wanted to DQ all military ballots sent in from APO addresses, even though those ballots were sitting in the election offices the day before the election...

5/2/2012 7:59:52 PM

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/romney-leads-obama-narrowly-in-montana.html

Romney vs Obama (all voters): 48-43
Independents: tied

Paul vs Obama (all): 49-41
Independents: 55-33

CRUSHING!!!

5/2/2012 9:32:09 PM

he's just not electable. no one will vote for him

5/2/2012 9:58:15 PM

Well, it would be hilarious just to see Congress set a record with 90% democrats in 2014

5/2/2012 10:02:56 PM

Fox News Announces Ron Paul Has Qualified

http://youtu.be/cBBZAt0TDas

5/3/2012 3:06:32 AM

Quote :

"so are ppl in NC voting for Paul in the early voting right now?"

I did yesterday. I certainly dont fully support all of his views and believe some of his supporters to be mouth breathing fools (notably one in this very thread) but the sum total of his policy views align most similar to me.

I realize we have already moved to the Romney versus Obama campaigning but I figured I'd still cast my vote for whom I align most closely with.

[Edited on May 3, 2012 at 11:02 AM. Reason : X]

5/3/2012 11:02:06 AM

^^Two points (no slam on you):

1) Who gives a flying F¥€£ what Faux News is saying?! They are only now realizing they are going to have to take back all of the lies they perpetrated for Romney because the facts are coming out that Ron Paul is scaring the P!$$ out of the Republican establishment, including Faux News, which brings me to my second point.

2) In no way is the Republican Party excited about Ron Paul still being in the race "to attract young voters." If they were, you wouldn't be hearing these statewide stories of the GOP threatening to cut off delegate candidates who support Ron Paul, like in NV, where the GOP told NV that they wouldn't be seating any NB delegates to the RNC if they were Ron Paul supporters.

^ Dude...if Romney doesn't have 1,144 delegates, THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY IS NOT OVER!!!



[Edited on May 3, 2012 at 11:06 AM. Reason : ^ and anger]

5/3/2012 11:03:31 AM

Quote :

"2) In no way is the Republican Party excited about Ron Paul still being in the race "to attract young voters." If they were, you wouldn't be hearing these statewide stories of the GOP threatening to cut off delegate candidates who support Ron Paul, like in NV, where the GOP told NV that they wouldn't be seating any NB delegates to the RNC if they were Ron Paul supporters."

So do you think this is the case because of some ideological reason or because they know he's unelectable?

5/3/2012 11:24:22 AM

I'd request that you refrain using the word unelectable. It's so ignorant.



Fact: He's held an elected government position 12 times. More than Romney, Santorum, AND Obama.

Fact: He's our only veteran running for president

Fact: He's the only republican that still has a his job. Romney is no longer a governor, Santorum lost re-election, and Newt was washed up and Gingrich was held largely responsible for republican losses in the house when he was forced to resign.

Fact: He's the only republican with real republican values and has the most republican voting record in Congress.

Fact: He's the only candidate that promotes the constitution, liberty, and freedom. He's the only candidate that has an explicit plan on how they're going to fix the economy.

Fact: He's the only candidate that doesn't flip flop on issues and is the most trustworthy candidate to do what he says.

Fact: He has the most active and majority voter base that will help him accomplish his ideas.




[Edited on May 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM. Reason : .]

5/3/2012 12:09:19 PM

Fact: Most of your facts are not facts.

5/3/2012 12:18:46 PM

+

5/3/2012 12:24:38 PM

5/3/2012 3:06:49 PM

that youtube acct was terminated

what did it say?

5/3/2012 5:54:50 PM

Quote :

"The Republican National Committee has sent a stern letter to the Nevada Republican Party warning the state not to draw too heavily from supporters of Texas Congressman Ron Paul (R) for its delegates, reports DC insider blog “The Hill.” If the delegation fails to feature the 20 out of 28 supporters it needs for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R), the national committee has warned that it will refuse to seat them at the Republican National Convention this summer. Rachel Maddow has reported that at this juncture, no delegates have been awarded to any of the candidates from Michigan, Iowa and other states including Nevada. Paul and his supporters have been using their own strategy, including some of the more obscure rules of delegate selection, to pack state committees with their own delegates. Paul enjoys strong support in Nevada. National officials are becoming worried that the congressman’s popularity could throw a wrench into the works of an otherwise smooth nomination process for Romney. . . . Initial vote counts said that Mitt Romney won the Iowa caucus, which was one of the earliest primary votes, held on January 3. Recounts have since then shown that the majority of votes in the state were actually won by Paul. "

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/03/rnc-may-block-nevada-delegation-if-it-seats-too-many-pro-paul-delegates/

5/3/2012 7:28:44 PM

^ Faux News has a similar article, only slanted from the Romney perspective that Ron Paul is STEALING these delegates.

Makes me P1$$ vinegar.

5/3/2012 7:35:48 PM

well...

either they are both right, both wrong, or one right and one wrong. good luck



Seeing how we know romney has the inside track, the likeliness of his campaign to do this is 10 to one.

Ron Paul has no prior members in the RNC and so the possibility of Ron Paul's campaign to rig elections is slim to none. Ron Paul is winning by playing by RNC's own rules. We've been saying how we were going to take the delegates by storm for MONTHS and people looked at us like we were crazy.


By the way...



[Edited on May 3, 2012 at 8:00 PM. Reason : .]

5/3/2012 7:41:15 PM

Whoever made that pic needs to work on their fucking grammar.

5/3/2012 8:07:42 PM

Should have used the text to cover up the empty seats. Or maybe just cropped the photo.

5/3/2012 10:10:33 PM

^^i think the poor grammar was planned to appeal to the overwhelmingly dumb electorate

5/3/2012 10:17:02 PM

his name is ronald paulson

5/3/2012 10:21:45 PM

5/4/2012 1:36:41 AM

Can the delegates be prosecuted legally for not voting as instructed by their constituents and in accordance with the popular vote? It seems that that Republican party would be well within their rights to exclude such delegates from the convention, particularly those that earned their post deceptively by feigning support for Romney.

5/4/2012 2:03:11 AM

Caucus results aren't necessarily binding.

5/4/2012 2:37:08 AM

Rule 38 of the 2008 and 2010 RNC rules state that "No delegate or alternate delegate should be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the "UNIT RULE"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zyyz2VdjSz0#t=180s

5/4/2012 3:31:05 AM

Yep...pretty much my last election as a Republican.

5/4/2012 7:35:59 AM

Pretty much the only thing right with the electoral system...NOT leaving the vote directly in the hands of the masses. Good for Paul if they pull it off.

5/4/2012 8:42:04 AM

[Edited on May 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM. Reason : .]

5/4/2012 2:05:08 PM

I want to believe.

5/4/2012 2:08:03 PM

if you're a conservative, and you still vote republican...you're a fucking sucker.

5/4/2012 2:22:30 PM

Can't wait to see footage of paulites getting beaten by security guards during the convention. In fact, it's probably the best thing that could happen. Every attempt will be made to just keep you out or make you invisible.

PS: It would be best not to be so obvious, like the dude with the pony tail in that last video. Buy a bunch of Romney paraphernalia to help get through the door. Only older males should be allowed to speak, as women and young males will simply be shouted down and escorted out. Super bonus points if you can find a black guy to speak for the group(they might hesitate to beat him), but good luck on that one.

[Edited on May 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM. Reason : .]

5/4/2012 2:24:28 PM

Hello, I'm smc and I like to say stupid shit to troll the soapbox.

5/4/2012 2:57:58 PM

as opposed to just saying stupid shit in the form of a sincere opinion.

5/4/2012 3:03:08 PM

You mean stupid shit like "if you're a conservative, and you still vote republican...you're a fucking sucker"

5/4/2012 3:08:03 PM

you are comically daft.

Yes, if you are a conservative, and you still give your loyalty to the republican party, then you are a grade-A sucker. Your belly-aching about Paul being screwed over by the republican party should be enough evidence to you (something liberals have acknowledged long ago) that the republican party no longer gives a half a shit about small-government conservatives. They have become the exclusive party of the rich.

The fact that you are able to grasp that Paul is being ignored by the very base that he is trying to win over should signal that the party has been completely hijacked by corporate oligarchs, using the American Christian Fundamentalists as their army of devoted followers.

And retards continue to vote republican even though none of their leaders give a damn about conservatism.

5/4/2012 3:38:59 PM

Quote :

"The fact that you are able to grasp that Paul is being ignored by the very base that he is trying to win over should signal that the party has been completely hijacked by corporate oligarchs, using the American Christian Fundamentalists as their army of devoted followers."

He's not ignored by the base he's trying to win over.

http://youtu.be/W53n-L7OmYg


He's ignored by the establishment.

5/4/2012 4:21:19 PM

the establishment? Oh, you mean the people who control the republican party? The very same party he's trying to win?

5/4/2012 4:26:54 PM

The republican party is just one leg on the octopus.

[Edited on May 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM. Reason : .]

5/4/2012 4:36:26 PM

It's not that he refuses to answer your question

It's that he honestly doesn't understand most anything

5/4/2012 4:52:01 PM

Jesus: Jelly? you mean the jelly in KY?

ME: no, I mean grape jelly.

Jesus: Jelly? you mean the jelly you use as sun tan lotion?

ME: no, I mean grape jelly.

Jesus Jelly? you mean the jelly...

5/4/2012 6:42:50 PM

I suddenly have a craving for jelly marinated octopi.

5/4/2012 7:19:56 PM

Jesus: Jelly? You mean the jelly you put on octopi?

Me: no, I mean grape jelly.

Jesus: Jelly? You mean the jelly...

5/4/2012 7:45:06 PM