User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Mark Gottfried Credibility Watch Page 1 ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... 186, Prev Next  
TreeTwista10
Forgetful Jones
147801 Posts
user info
edit post

Ed was

3/3/2012 3:50:11 AM

eli
All American
1581 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"They haven't been relevant except for the national championship they won and the deep runs they made in the tournament"


Clearly that's pretty obscure. We're talking University of Alaska - Fairbanks relevant...

3/3/2012 4:16:02 AM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

This is why I can't take sports talk seriously. There are people who consider Charles o'bannon to be nasty.

You must have loved his work as a summer intern anchor on "channel 1" in august '95 because he definitely wasn't nasty at basketball.


Did you mean to say zidek or Toby? Dwight Stewart from halfcourt, its.good!!

3/3/2012 5:19:34 AM

ncwolfpack
All American
3958 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"lol gottfried is not going anywhere. he sees the opportunity we have here. he has a close knit relationship with debbie yow and he isn't going to screw her over like that. more importantly, he knows what the importance of basketball is in this area and he likes the challenge and opportunity to return NC State to greatness. he already did it at UCLA, albeit as an an assistant. it's time to do it here now."


Can you score me lunch with coach? Shouldn't be too difficult since you know him so well.

But no, really...I believe you're right for the most part. I just wouldn't be as confident as you in saying so.

On a related note, I would love to eat lunch with Gottfried and just pick his brain. For some reason, I never really felt that way about Lowe. I'd like to meet Lowe and shake his hand, but it seems like it would be a blast just to sit down and talk with Gottfried.

3/3/2012 9:17:45 AM

KeB
All American
9828 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"This is why I can't take seriously. There are people who consider Charles o'bannon to be nasty.
"


So what would you call averaging 14.4 points per game for 4 years and winning a national championship?

How about first team all Pac 10 in 1996 and 1997. That had to be hard to do while anchoring a news show at the same time.

Oh i forgot, you just make baseless rants without really consulting statistics...



[Edited on March 3, 2012 at 12:22 PM. Reason : ///]

3/3/2012 12:18:47 PM

face
All American
8503 Posts
user info
edit post

hmm, ill have to admit he was better than i thought. "Sick" is a little overstated for him, but given that you were referring to the combination of the brothers thats not way off.

He was just overshadowed by his brother and all the other talent on the '95 team when he was only a sophomore.

3/3/2012 4:01:47 PM

TreeTwista10
Forgetful Jones
147801 Posts
user info
edit post

9-7 ACC
20-11 overall

CREDIBLE

3/4/2012 8:00:45 PM

Førte
All American
23525 Posts
user info
edit post

he's not incredible, but he's not uncredible either. better than lowe, that's for sure. get to the semis, then we'll talk about credible.

3/4/2012 8:03:00 PM

jdman
the Dr is in
3848 Posts
user info
edit post

wow, nine conference wins.

3/4/2012 8:09:02 PM

Wolfman Tim
All American
9654 Posts
user info
edit post

How big is his bonus for making the tournament this year?

3/4/2012 8:27:59 PM

Kodiak
All American
7067 Posts
user info
edit post

Not sure about the monetary bonus, but if we make the tourney it automatically triggers a one-year contract extension.

3/4/2012 8:30:16 PM

ActionPants
All American
9877 Posts
user info
edit post

Doesn't this win match our all-time ACC road wins under Sid?

3/4/2012 8:31:08 PM

packboozie
All American
17452 Posts
user info
edit post

9-7 and was "in" every game but at UNC. I'll take it, and I'm sure all of you would have too before the season.

3/4/2012 8:31:53 PM

TreeTwista10
Forgetful Jones
147801 Posts
user info
edit post

Cam ain't gonna win the Super Bowl his rookie year

we're clearly on the right track

yes I know what thread I'm posting in

3/4/2012 8:33:02 PM

FatTony
All American
1769 Posts
user info
edit post

Biggest jump in acct seedings for state in almost 50 years. Last year we were 11th.

Somewhat credible.

3/4/2012 8:44:10 PM

HCH
All American
3895 Posts
user info
edit post

Only the 5th time we have had a winning conference record since 1992.

+20 credibility wins.

3/4/2012 8:50:04 PM

PKSebben
All American
1386 Posts
user info
edit post

We won't be a #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament. That is a failure. - face

3/4/2012 8:51:40 PM

natureboy
All American
2774 Posts
user info
edit post

I wouldn't say we were in the FSU game. I seem to remembe they pretty much dominated us.

3/4/2012 9:51:23 PM

kevmcd86
All American
5832 Posts
user info
edit post

+20 Mad credz for winning conference record

3/4/2012 10:00:00 PM

BigT716
All American
3458 Posts
user info
edit post

Credible as fuck.

3/5/2012 7:18:35 AM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
50084 Posts
user info
edit post

Oh FFS are people really talking about Gottfried to UCLA? Didnt you people learn anything from the Lowe debacle?

Good regular season. That awful GT resume killing loss is what's separating us from the NCAA tourney. Need to not have those going forward..

Quote :
"but in another sense, they are similar to us in that they haven't really been a relevant program since the 1970s...again, I know they won a shitload of titles and have been more successful than us lately"


Twista, I'm surprised at you. They've made the same number of Final Fours in the last ten years as we've made in our entire history..

[Edited on March 5, 2012 at 8:25 AM. Reason : X]

3/5/2012 8:19:57 AM

rflong
All American
11472 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
""in" every game but at UNC"


Both the GT and FSU games we were not really "in" the game. We never got much closer than like 7 in the 2nd half in either game.

If we just had a little more depth this season, we could have closed out wins against IU, Stanford, UVa, and Duke and would be sitting pretty. Oh well, still happy with what Gott has been able to do in his first season.

3/5/2012 9:31:08 AM

HOOPS MALONE
Suspended
2258 Posts
user info
edit post

Gottfield has peaked, Lowe is turning a corner in the pros

3/5/2012 9:39:29 AM

Shrike
All American
9594 Posts
user info
edit post

The only reason anyone could realistically be disappointed with this season is how close we were to having an even better season. IU, Stanford, Duke, UVA, Clemson, the wtf GT loss. Win any 3 of those and we'd be safely in the tournament. Other than that, we should all be thrilled. Compared to the last 5 years, we actually look like a semi-professional basketball team out there. Our losses were mostly due to correctable dumb basketball, NC State shit, and a lack of depth/experience. Credible. as. fuck.

3/5/2012 11:49:08 AM

jbrick83
All American
23447 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Twista, I'm surprised at you. They've made the same number of Final Fours in the last ten years as we've made in our entire history.. "


The confidence in his sports knowledge has grown at an inverse rate as the quality of his posts.

3/5/2012 12:07:24 PM

TreeTwista10
Forgetful Jones
147801 Posts
user info
edit post

UCLA and NC State both have 1 title apiece in 99% of our lifetimes

maybe i should've just said "Gottfried isn't going to UCLA"

3/5/2012 12:33:37 PM

V0LC0M
All American
21263 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The only reason anyone could realistically be disappointed with this season is how close we were to having an even better season. IU, Stanford, Duke, UVA, Clemson, the wtf GT loss. Win any 3 of those and we'd be safely in the tournament. Other than that, we should all be thrilled. Compared to the last 5 years, we actually look like a semi-professional basketball team out there. Our losses were mostly due to correctable dumb basketball, NC State shit, and a lack of depth/experience. Credible. as. fuck."

3/5/2012 12:41:49 PM

jbrick83
All American
23447 Posts
user info
edit post

Russel Westbrook, Kevin Love, Jrue Holiday, Trevor Ariza, Arron Afflalo, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, Jrue Holiday, Darren Collison, Matt Barnes, Baron Davis, Jordan Farmar...

3/5/2012 12:52:09 PM

stillrolling
All American
1225 Posts
user info
edit post

You forgot Jrue Holiday

3/5/2012 1:04:41 PM

mkcarter
PLAY SO HARD
4362 Posts
user info
edit post

^Jrue holliday

3/5/2012 1:05:32 PM

tommy wiseau
All American
2624 Posts
user info
edit post

still credible

3/5/2012 1:11:52 PM

Bullet
All American
28024 Posts
user info
edit post

definitely credible. the team definitely improved this season.

3/5/2012 1:14:29 PM

TreeTwista10
Forgetful Jones
147801 Posts
user info
edit post

Mark Gottfried > Jamie Dixon
Mark Gottfried > Jay Wright

3/7/2012 11:53:31 PM

packboozie
All American
17452 Posts
user info
edit post

So what. Greggggg Marshall > Mark Gottfried based on this year too.

3/8/2012 2:00:21 AM

ncWOLFsu
Gottfather FTL
12586 Posts
user info
edit post

I think we've only had 3 really bad games all year. That's a huge improvement for us, compared to the last several years.

(GT, @UNC, FSU)

3/8/2012 2:09:49 AM

skokiaan
All American
26447 Posts
user info
edit post

It's only those games if you are only looking at offense, which is what fans tend to do.

Vanderbilt, clemson, stanford, uva, duke were all bad games for us.

All because of our hilariously bad 3 point defense, and the fact that vandy, clemson, and stanford are legitimately shitty teams.

3/8/2012 6:26:10 AM

BJCaudill21
Not an alcoholic
8015 Posts
user info
edit post

vandy is definitely not a "legitimately shitty team"

3/8/2012 6:33:31 AM

Talage
All American
5087 Posts
user info
edit post

Eh, I wouldn't put Vanderbilt in that list with Clemson and Stanford. Vanderbilt is actually a decent team...just not the top 10 team people thought they were going to be at the beginning of the season.

3/8/2012 6:34:38 AM

MORR1799
All American
3051 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^

3/8/2012 9:29:36 AM

Elwood
All American
4047 Posts
user info
edit post

GT was banking shit in and couldn't miss, we played good D (for us), God didn't want us to win that game.

3/8/2012 9:30:17 AM

BobbyDigital
Thots and Prayers
41777 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"So what. Greggggg Marshall > Mark Gottfried based on this year too."


Gregg still has three g's when he needs only two. This negates any perceived advantage in the W/L column.

3/8/2012 9:32:23 AM

Slave Famous
Become Wrath
34079 Posts
user info
edit post

You're the last person who should be knocking someone for having too many letters in their name

3/8/2012 9:38:03 AM

Wolfman Tim
All American
9654 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"vandy, clemson, and stanford are legitimately shitty teams."

the fact that you have to say this shows a lot about this season for us

3/8/2012 9:46:21 AM

ParksNrec
All American
8741 Posts
user info
edit post

I'll believe Greggg Marshall is legit when he gets hired by a team in a real conference and doesn't shit the bed.

3/8/2012 9:48:14 AM

ncWOLFsu
Gottfather FTL
12586 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"It's only those games if you are only looking at offense, which is what fans tend to do.

Vanderbilt, clemson, stanford, uva, duke were all bad games for us.

All because of our hilariously bad 3 point defense, and the fact that vandy, clemson, and stanford are legitimately shitty teams."


it's only those games because it's only those games. those are our only BAD games. there are other games we had excellent opportunities to win, but failed to do so. that is still a WAY better situation than playing so poorly that you're never in the game at all.

vandy is not a shitty team, and we were also missing scott wood that game. although i know most of you want him benched, so maybe that was actually an advantage for us that he didn't play.

clemson we lost in OT. it was a painful loss but it wasn't a BAD one. it's on the road and came down to the last second.

we played a great game against duke, we just ran out of players. should you be able to hang onto a 20 point lead with 11 minutes left? damn right you should, but our bench can't do that against the 2nd best team in the conference. we have no depth. not a bad loss, just a really fucking painful one.

i stand by my statement that those 3 games were our only truly bad games all year.

3/8/2012 9:51:35 AM

Ernie
All American
45943 Posts
user info
edit post

Georgia Tech, dude.

3/8/2012 9:55:26 AM

ncWOLFsu
Gottfather FTL
12586 Posts
user info
edit post

^I'm not sure i understand.

Georgia Tech is among the 3 games I listed as our only truly bad losses all year. Are you implying that the GT loss was so bad that it, in fact, turned other games into bad losses as well? What are you implying, exactly?

3/8/2012 11:04:21 AM

Ernie
All American
45943 Posts
user info
edit post

Beats me, tuff guy.

3/8/2012 11:06:25 AM

ncWOLFsu
Gottfather FTL
12586 Posts
user info
edit post

lmao. fair enough

3/8/2012 11:06:59 AM

Førte
All American
23525 Posts
user info
edit post

ok, NCAA or NIT, after that, the nigga's credible

3/9/2012 4:30:08 PM

 Message Boards » Sports Talk » Mark Gottfried Credibility Watch Page 1 ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... 186, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.