Quote :

"hey...right now im asking one question....yes or no....is there a difference between the MSM making mistakes and telling lies??"

5/24/2006 3:59:38 PM

saying either

1. one of the founding members of NAFTA is not actually in it

OR

2. laptops are now being made with keyloggers that report back to the gov't or whatever the fuck

is not a typo
and
its not a mistake


its an error

turning left when i needed to turn right
thats a mistake

fabricating information is not a mistake

5/24/2006 4:00:33 PM

5/24/2006 4:01:40 PM

ANSWER ME, no answer me, No Answer Me ME FIRST, IM NOT A TROLL me me me me

like little baby birds trolls waiting for the mother's puked worm, I tell ya.



[Edited on May 24, 2006 at 4:06 PM. Reason : .]

5/24/2006 4:04:59 PM

Quote :

"hey...right now im asking one question....yes or no....is there a difference between the MSM making mistakes and telling lies??"

Of course there is a difference.

Quote :

"AND THIS IS ONE OF THOSE "HARD-HITTING QUESTIONS" THAT "REFUTES MY POSITION", AND IF I HAD IGNORED WOULD HAVE SHOWN ME TO "NOT ENGAGING IN A RATIONAL DISCUSSION"

5/24/2006 4:16:52 PM

wow....thank you...

5/24/2006 4:18:15 PM

that was an important, hard-hitting question dude

you should be proud of that one

5/24/2006 4:23:40 PM

no...im not really proud of the question...im proud of you ...for answering one...granted it was simple and if you got it wrong...well...you would be an idiot....but you already are an idiot soo....

BUT WAY TO GO WITH ANSWERING A QUESTION!!!!

5/24/2006 4:36:15 PM

i've NEVER answered a question before

thank you for giving me the opportunity to do so

5/24/2006 4:45:37 PM

you are ever so welcome

5/24/2006 4:55:18 PM

i NEVER answered a question before

NEVER

5/24/2006 4:56:47 PM

Quote :

"And when you challenge someone to "think a different way" other than what they constantly see on t.v you get equated with being a wacko"

true and legitimate point...some great thinkers are considered wackos just for thinking differently or approaching problems different ways

however, there are some serious wackos out there who's ideas are too wacko...some people might think anybody different is a wacko, but some people, who might eat salisbury steak on occasion, think every single "wacko" is good and all the "non-wackos" are wackos

that last bit might be slightly confusing but i'm just saying they arent all wackos, but they're not all sane either

5/24/2006 5:02:12 PM

Quote :

"i NEVER answered a question before NEVER"

i never said that...."strawman much"

im just saying that your welcome for the chance to actually answer one

5/24/2006 5:08:27 PM

salisburyboy NEVER thinks his e-tabloids are wrong

NEVER

5/24/2006 5:09:44 PM

ok

let's get back to how surrendering American national sovereignty is a good thing

5/24/2006 5:15:02 PM

its not a good thing

i am moderately conservative and i dont like the idea

jerome corsi is a fool

5/24/2006 5:23:37 PM

the jews did it

5/24/2006 7:10:22 PM

It's not a good thing to me on any continent/landmass that involved the lives of WWI vts', WWII vts'and for the sake of a Cold War, let alone america.

I know politics = paradigm, but if we concede to an NAU that would be a huge slap in the face. Major. That move would be the equivalent to digging a hole, and filling it back up with dirt. For what purpose? Those who faught and died for our country, fought for sovereignty. Give me a better reason for the merging of an NAU.

5/24/2006 7:33:28 PM

WHY ARE WE EVEN DISCUSSING THIS?

5/24/2006 7:38:43 PM

^are you in the right thread?

5/24/2006 7:40:12 PM

if its a salisburyboy thread

that statement is generally applicable

5/24/2006 7:42:57 PM

I know you answer questions, Salisburyboy. That's why I'm a bit perturbed that you're not answering the ones I posed, the ones that don't involve calling you a crackpot or a looney.

5/24/2006 9:09:35 PM

because hes a fucking moonbat. and i dont know why you're so desperate for a moonbat to acknowledge you.

Quote :

" MOON WORSHIPPERS!!! DARKSIDED! "

5/24/2006 10:47:07 PM

bttt before it was ruined by stinkin' trolls.

5/25/2006 7:47:23 PM

dude

we're not trolling

this guy suggested that canada is not in NAFTA

5/25/2006 7:56:26 PM

the new senate bill...wow

my faith in representative politics has went down the drain!!

we may as well erase the damn borders...

[Edited on May 26, 2006 at 4:03 PM. Reason : .]

5/26/2006 3:56:42 PM

Quote :

"my faith in representative politics has went down the drain!!"

lol at ever having faith in politics

5/26/2006 4:05:37 PM

This WorldNetDaily report on the CFR plan to create a "North American Community" probably precipitated the previously referenced articles on the subject...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49992

Quote :

"'SECRETS OF THE INVASION' Why America's government invites rampant illegal immigration May 1, 2006 [...] In its groundbreaking May edition, WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine reveals the astounding hidden agendas, plans and people behind America's immigration nightmare. Titled "ALIEN NATION," the issue is subtitled "SECRETS OF THE INVASION: Why government invites rampant illegal immigration." Indeed, it reveals pivotal secrets very few Americans know. For example: Did you know that the powerfully influential Council on Foreign Relations – often described as a “shadow government" – issued a comprehensive report last year laying out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter"? Roughly translated: In the next few years, according to the 59-page report titled "Building a North American Community," the U.S. must be integrated with the socialism, corruption, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. As Phyllis Schlafly reveals in this issue of Whistleblower: "This CFR document asserts that President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin 'committed their governments' to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America' and assigned 'working groups' to fill in the details. It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American Summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet 'vigilantes' on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona." The CFR report – important excerpts of which are published in Whistleblower – also suggests North American elitists begin getting together regularly, and presumably secretly, "to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support transatlantic relations." The Bilderberg and Wehrkunde conferences are highly secret conclaves of the powerful. For decades, there have been suspicions that such meetings were used for plotting the course of world events and especially the centralization of global decision-making."

5/31/2006 10:05:10 AM

WHY DO I KEEP BTTTING THIS STUFF TO TROLL

I MEAN, THATS WHAT THE DUKE 866 SAYS I'M ALWAYS DOING RIGHT

WHY DO I KEEP DOING THIS TO US

5/31/2006 10:09:40 AM

MY DOMAIN NAME SOUNDS LIKE A LEGITIMATE NEWS SOURCE SO THEREFORE ITS A LEGITIMATE NEWS SOURCE

5/31/2006 11:20:44 AM

should we let Greenland into our one-continent government?

5/31/2006 12:20:32 PM

^gotta put the landfill somewhere

5/31/2006 12:38:32 PM

bttt since im your superman typing alias

6/8/2006 2:09:23 PM

^ you're a cunt. and your thread sucks.

6/9/2006 3:37:41 AM

On the I-69 project...

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/15476.html

Quote :

"Canada, the United States, and Mexico... a possible merger? June 20, 2006 By Felicia (Fee) Benamon If someone would have told me last year that some of our leaders in our government and those of the powerful elite in this country were plotting to merge Canada, the United States, and Mexico, I would have brushed it aside as a conspiracy theory. Yes, it seems wild, however as we face the huge illegal immigration issue, many conservatives are now starting to put the pieces together. Is the lax view in which our government is taking regarding illegal immigration connected to plans to merge America with Canada and Mexico? Many reasons have led me to think this is a possible scenario. [...] A project in the works to connect Canada, America, and Mexico through the I-69 highway has me connecting the dots. It is indeed a massive project that is intended to allow for the easy flow of goods and services, under the banner of "free trade." This will no doubt inconvenience many people, and right now, in my area of Tennessee, local governments are meeting with the public about possible changes they may experience due to the I-69 highway running through this area. The entire I-69 project has been in planning mode for some time. Currently I-69 begins in the state of Indiana and runs through Michigan to the Canadian border. But other states like Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas will also be affected as talks heat up about extending the highway all the way to Mexico."

6/21/2006 3:39:10 PM

A highway is being extended, and from the you conclude that the US is going to merge with Canada and Mexico?

Heaven forbid that goods be able to travel from one point to another via a short route.

6/21/2006 3:46:16 PM

OH NO

NOT A ROAD!!!!!!11

6/21/2006 3:46:30 PM

ehe 69

6/21/2006 3:46:35 PM

Do you have any thoughts on the I-69 situation in addition to the links?

6/21/2006 3:52:28 PM

http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-209281.html

Quote :

"North American Leaders Unveil Security and Prosperity Partnership Bush, Fox, Martin outline trilateral efforts during March 23 meeting President Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican President Vicente Fox announced the establishment of the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" in a March 23 joint statement. Convening that same day in Waco, Texas, for a trilateral meeting, the North American leaders said the security and prosperity of their nations are "mutually dependent and complementary" and explained the impetus for the new initiative."

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50657

Quote :

"Tancredo confronts 'super-state' effort Demands full disclosure of White House work with Mexico, Canada Posted: June 15, 2006 © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com Responding to a WorldNetDaily report, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress."

FOIA request filed to expose plans for 'North American union'
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50719

Infowars Pan American Union Archive
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/north_american_union_superstate_docss.htm

6/21/2006 3:54:51 PM

do you have any thoughts on this subject other than the links??

6/21/2006 3:56:15 PM

So... what are you saying?

6/21/2006 3:56:37 PM

He stole my headline...

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=105318

Quote :

"Goodbye USA, Hello North American Union? Jun 13, '06 Jerome R. Corsi PhD, tells us what is waiting for the American People by the year 2010. Bush signed an agreement last year with Mexico and Canada to merge into a North American Union (NAU) similar to the European Union. The USA will be subject to a new 'Umbrella Government' that will call the shots and erode U.S. sovereignty. Could this be why Bush has been stalling on sealing the southern border of the USA with Mexico? How dies this affect Israel? Startling news you must hear and research yourself."

6/21/2006 4:09:06 PM

So let me guess, the Jews are behind it, even though you have no hard proof.

6/21/2006 4:10:16 PM

How does a road constitute an American Union?

6/21/2006 4:12:21 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union

Quote :

"North American Union The North American Union is a proposed international government encompassing the nations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It could be considered the North American analogue of the European Union. The blueprint for this governing body was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an American foreign policy think tank, with input from the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales."

6/21/2006 4:13:20 PM

So, do you never answer questions?

6/21/2006 4:15:25 PM

How does a free trade zone constitute a loss of sovereignty?

6/21/2006 4:17:14 PM

What's your question?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/6/15/132429.shtml

Quote :

"North American Union: Deconstructing the U.S. Diane Alden Friday, June 16, 2006 [...] The task force is quite clear that one of the major goals of this effort is to remake boundaries around the three North American nations. Individual countries will relate to a supranational parliamentary or governing system rather than to their own. National governments will still have limited power but not so much sovereignty. Immigration, in their ultimate plan, will mean open borders and a vastly diminished importance of citizenship in the three nations."

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/6/16/141829.shtml

Quote :

"North American Union: Coup d'état American Style Diane Alden Saturday, June 17, 2006 By 2010, the integration of Mexico, Canada and the U.S. will be almost complete. Congress and the media will not know what happened. Americans will be as clueless as ever; thanks to the complicity of the brain-dead media, the triumph of a bloodless bureaucratic elitist coup will become a reality, or close to it."

6/21/2006 4:19:38 PM

Well my question was about the road, but the sovereignty question is a better one.

6/21/2006 4:22:30 PM