Sure, but are those women fatties? Or are they just lascivious slatters?
8/20/2010 1:27:28 AM
that stat probably means that I'm going to die alone and unmarried.
8/20/2010 1:28:39 AM
8/25/2010 5:15:26 PM
you didn't bold the important parts
8/25/2010 5:18:43 PM
^crazed hospital security guard beat the shit out of a patient who was misidentified and almost forced into surgery he did not want or need
8/25/2010 5:24:12 PM
pretty much the whole article is one big clusterfuck
8/25/2010 5:24:30 PM
8/25/2010 5:32:02 PM
8/25/2010 6:53:19 PM
8/27/2010 3:35:41 PM
8/28/2010 11:56:25 AM
Sounds like a mafia boss going after families of people
8/28/2010 12:06:28 PM
8/31/2010 11:20:00 AM
9/1/2010 12:11:43 PM
9/21/2010 3:12:33 PM
9/29/2010 3:55:42 PM
10/1/2010 11:49:08 AM
10/7/2010 5:00:29 PM
10/12/2010 12:33:45 PM
10/21/2010 12:22:46 PM
I've never been comfortable with the idea that you can be charged with murder when you shoot someone who breaks into your house if they happen to be a cop. Anyone can say that they're a police officer. And let's face it; when someone breaks down your door in the middle of the night and is screaming at you, would you rather spend critical seconds lining up your shot or trying to figure out what the crazy people who just knocked down your door are screaming?
10/21/2010 1:40:10 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undecidable_problems
10/21/2010 3:17:25 PM
^^exactly. that (^^^) entire situation is fucked. I'm torn on the issue of no-knock warrants, but if you're going to do them, you must realize that in many states, citizens have the LEGAL RIGHT to protect themselves, which often means using lethal force to cease illegal entry into your home. If you're going to do no-knocks, you're taking the risk of legally being shot at. I don't care what's on your vest or what you yell, anyone can do wear those things and/or yell them; not to mention in the heat of the moment, you may not hear/understand the words or see the writing. If cops are worried about getting shot then they shouldn't do no-knocks.And fuck the police who said this isn't a war; you don't need those things (guns). A 9mm pistol and an AR-15 are perfectly legal weapons used by thousands of citizens for their entertainment. they have nothing to do with war/vietnam in this case.
10/21/2010 4:27:52 PM
10/28/2010 10:13:27 AM
I just watched that video... it was not a stomping. It was an improper restraint, but not a stomping. He was trying to hold her down with his foot, she struggled, and his foot slipped down onto her neck area- that is very far from a "curbing." yes, it could legally be called assault, but it is ridiculous to call it a "stomping"
10/28/2010 10:18:37 AM
either way, when stepping on someone's face, the onus isn't generally on the face owner to apologize for the incident
10/28/2010 10:29:30 AM
he came down force while having her foot already on her headthat was a fucking stomp and someone should stomp on his headi dont care who you vote for but fucking republicans are disgusting from the stupid bitch that carved the B in her face to this guy to all the homophobic rednecks and racists im so glad im not associated with people like that[Edited on October 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM. Reason : how can you defend that?]
10/28/2010 10:39:15 AM
well lets hope she doesn't get bullied into dropping the charges. that guy needs to spend some time in the butt hut since he thinks it is fine to assault a defenseless woman while a video camera is recording the whole thing
10/28/2010 1:52:08 PM
10/28/2010 3:23:56 PM
10/31/2010 1:03:24 AM
11/19/2010 10:18:22 AM
12/14/2010 11:39:56 AM
12/29/2010 3:36:57 AM
Financial Aid lady on the phone: Oh you need to speak with them about that. Me: Who's them?Financial Aid lady: Financial AidMe: Well who are you?Financial Aid lady: Financial AidMe: Well then, are you 'them'?Financial Aid lady: ummmMe: Ok. Let's do it your way. I'm unfamiliar with who falls under the 'them' definition of Financial Aid, so why do we try names and get this thing figured out. So what is the name of the person I need to talk to if that person is not you?Financial Aid lady: umm, Financial AidMe: Ahh. How unfortunate that someone named their child that. What her/his office location/phone number?Financial Aid lady: The number you called. Me: Oh. So you're Financial Aid, I was thrown off because you said your name was Lucy.Financial Aid lady: umm what?Me: So, Ms. Aid, what needs to happen here?Financial Aid lady: umm, Sir? Can I put you on hold?Me: Sure.<20 mins later>Financial Aid lady: Ok, the person you need to talk to is .... transferring you now.
12/29/2010 4:32:06 PM
^lol
12/29/2010 4:33:26 PM
yeah. I almost ragequit and hung up in disgust, but I didn't have anything better to do this morning so I played the game. Totally fucked her world up lol. She was so confused-but then again, that's par for the course probably.
12/29/2010 4:36:43 PM
http://www.google.com/patents?id=hhYJAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4#v=onepage&q&f=false
1/14/2011 10:10:10 AM
1/25/2011 4:40:23 PM
3/13/2011 3:59:42 PM
now that's real racism!
3/13/2011 4:45:06 PM
3/20/2011 9:47:56 PM
3/20/2011 9:50:04 PM
What's wrong with the last post? It makes perfect sense.
3/21/2011 2:35:42 PM
^ i'm far from a chess master, but until someone moves a piece, i don't see how this is realistic:
3/21/2011 2:41:06 PM
It would have to be c, because like tic-tac-toe, you know every combination of games and therefore it will be a CATS game every time.
3/21/2011 2:51:50 PM
^^I can see part c if no pieces were moved. If they outlined multiple perfect games which all end in draws (like what the article says), then they realize that no matter what happens, the outcome between them will always be a draw. I can not see part a or b though, because that would mean the game is imbalanced.I can see all three possibilities if a piece has moved...though vaguely for parts a and b.[Edited on March 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM. Reason : lkj]
3/21/2011 2:55:39 PM
so it's only feasible if both players admit that the opposing player is their unerring, perfect equal?that's why it's unrealistic
3/21/2011 3:03:12 PM
If there was a method for winning without thinking... as in... someone figured out how to win 100% of the time with the same combination of moves, then the game wouldn't exist.The shear number of games played since the beginning of time of Chess without finding such a perfect game to exist is proof that one does not exist. The number of chess games played on Earth is much greater than the number of every combination of moves possible. The fact that the game is perfectly balanced and most humans can't remember every combination of moves, is what makes the game so fun to play.[Edited on March 21, 2011 at 3:04 PM. Reason : .]
3/21/2011 3:03:16 PM
^^ He clearly states the game is between two mental giants.
3/21/2011 4:19:19 PM
3/21/2011 4:21:55 PM
3/21/2011 4:26:31 PM