PAGE 70, and boom goes the dynamite.

4/13/2011 4:47:11 PM

?

4/13/2011 4:49:50 PM

What ^ said

4/13/2011 4:51:22 PM

LAWYER THIS MOTHER TRUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4/13/2011 4:51:45 PM

4/13/2011 4:53:38 PM

^ROFL!

4/13/2011 5:09:36 PM

ok LOLOLOLOL

and who just got lawyered?

4/13/2011 5:18:44 PM

so did they find the exact dumpsite in google street view or something in his cache?

OR was he looking at wider portion of cary that included that area. little bit different, right?

if the former, pretty damming.

4/13/2011 5:36:48 PM

^

Quote :

"according to the GOLAMEs, the zip code he actually entered on the google maps search was not the one Nancy was found in, and he was looking at a much wider area"

4/13/2011 5:40:39 PM

well yea.... entering a ZIP code nearyby is a much different than having pictures of the exact road/whatever in your cache.

Quote :

"accessed multiple photos"

just was curious what those photos contained

[Edited on April 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM. Reason : V <3]

4/13/2011 5:49:33 PM

Quote :

"Chris Chappell, a Durham police detective assigned to the FBI's Cyber Task Force, said that multiple aerial photos were accessed from Google Maps on Brad Cooper's laptop computer at 1:15 p.m. on July 11, 2008, while he was at work. "It appears to be from the area of Fielding Drive," Chappell said. "It is my understanding (that’s) where Nancy Cooper's body was found." Chappell said that Brad Cooper's computer files showed that someone searched for the ZIP code 27518 and determined, based on the latitude and longitude, that the center of that area was Fielding Drive. Through a more in-depth examination, Chappell said, he found that the user zoomed in on the map for multiple views of the area. "This is from before Nancy Cooper's body was found?" Wake County Assistant District Attorney Boz Zellinger asked."

4/13/2011 5:53:47 PM

Really folks, think about it. If Brad Cooper did kill her, and covered his tracks this well so far, why would he be looking for a dump site on (probably) outdated google maps images from the home computer.

What if the guy who Nancy wanted to "go for a run" with called her up on the 11th and said "lets go for a run tomorrow morning first thing?" Maybe Nancy was on the computer scouting a new jogging route close to home where Brad wouldn't be likely to see her running with another dude. Maybe she jogged out there and met dude, to jog or bwn, and after or during he kills her. He strips her for fear his DNA is on her clothes or person and takes off.

4/13/2011 7:57:16 PM

he was on his computer at work.

couldnt have been Nancy.

plus he google mapped the zip code, not the street itself.

4/13/2011 8:02:51 PM

OHHHH I thought we were talking home computer here. Gotcha. However, I don't think that is enough to convict him on. Is that the only area he looked at at that time? What else was going on at the same time on his computer? Did he have Whoop Dat Trick playing in iTunes and another browser tab on the wikipedia page for strangulation or something?

4/13/2011 8:20:05 PM

no, but his co-workers said they were at lunch at that same time with him...they also have said it was only a total time of 41 seconds and havent gone into detail about what other areas he may have scrolled over. its possible that he just randomly scrolled over it when trying to look at a completely different area but that image history remains.

4/13/2011 8:23:52 PM

The WRAL news clip about today comes very close to mentioning TWW
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/nancycooper/video/9436593/


Gessner U MAD??????????????

4/13/2011 8:54:11 PM

Quote :

"Is that the only area he looked at at that time? "

I'd also be interested to know this....

Edit: Just looked at ^ video...the reporter says the google search was for the "exact spot" where her body was found...I thought it was just close to the area. Which is it?

And the judge called out people leaking stuff about the trial on the internet, but that wasn't in reference to the google search thing was it? I mean, WRAL posted that themselves...

[Edited on April 13, 2011 at 9:31 PM. Reason : ]

4/13/2011 9:26:57 PM

He looked at several other places that might be good to dump a body....

4/13/2011 9:30:38 PM

I thought that the place the body was dumped was an active construction site? It's not like you can check that out on google maps.

4/13/2011 9:40:26 PM

Superior Court Judge Paul Gessner is corrupt. Why else would he want to hide what goes on in a capital murder trial behind closed doors? Shameful behavior. He's clearly on the side of prosecutors. Mistrial.

4/13/2011 9:42:54 PM

Quote :

"WRAL posted that themselves"

haha yea, it went viral because they tweeted about it.

4/13/2011 10:07:52 PM

it's a shame they won't broadcast the FBI testimony. WRAL makes it sound like he zoomed in on distinct images of the dump site, yet he googled zip code 27618 and was online for 41 seconds during a time when he was known to be having lunch with coworkers. The body dump site is in zip code 27606. If I were trying to figure out where to dump a body, I think I'd spend more than 41 seconds looking in the wrong zip code before making that determination.

4/13/2011 10:17:11 PM

just watched the clip of them arguing about the FBI's testimony/master file table.

major

4/13/2011 10:31:43 PM

where did they come close to mentioning tww? didnt hear it in the posted link

4/13/2011 10:50:09 PM

the google map satellite image for the area in a 3 mile radius of my house probably appears in my internet cache

it's probably pretty common

4/13/2011 11:01:32 PM

why is this thread so long

isn't she dead

what is there to fucking talk about

4/13/2011 11:02:07 PM

she's not dead, she's missing

can't you read the thread title?

4/13/2011 11:02:37 PM

but that cache image appeared the DAY before she went missing thats why its odd

4/13/2011 11:03:21 PM

^^that was in 2008 bro

idc about the story but, I'm just assuming she dead

and yes I realize you were probably being sarcastic

whatever

I'm outta here

word to your respective mothers

4/13/2011 11:05:09 PM

Quote :

"but that cache image appeared the DAY before she went missing thats why its odd"

but what i'm saying is that i probably look at a map that includes the 3 miles around my house most days

4/14/2011 12:13:20 AM

Could spin that as he was looking for places to search for nancy. Potential running routes.

And in reality, he looked after nancy was fucking dead. Latest she was dumped has been established as being 11am, likely earlier. Why the fuck would you look for a dump site after you pitched the body?

Or am I mixing my days?

4/14/2011 12:32:41 AM

trick went running on the 12th

4/14/2011 12:34:02 AM

oh, my bad, thought it was the 11th. Yeah, that's a tough on to explain...

And I have thought he may have done it... I haven't seen anything linking him to the crime, this is maybe about it.

We have one piece of evidence that carries any real weight, despite being circumstantial... I hope the prosecution has more up its sleeve...

[Edited on April 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM. Reason : .]

4/14/2011 12:35:03 AM

Quote :

"but that cache image appeared the DAY before she went missing thats why its odd"

It's definitely weird as hell and tough to explain for the defense.

4/14/2011 12:41:00 AM

not entirely.

if it was tampered with it makes it noncompliant

in addition, if he was just looking at the zip code in general it brings up that part of cary because its like 3 miles from his house...if you were to zoom in on the part near his house and then scroll or do the hand grab thing it could potentially go over that particular area if you were looking for something else thus saving that cache image on your computer when in fact you only had it on your screen for a small portion of time. all depends on the time logs.

4/14/2011 1:31:28 AM

the judge is in way over his head with the technical side of this case and I think it's hurting Brad's side.

[Edited on April 14, 2011 at 2:04 AM. Reason : x]

4/14/2011 2:04:41 AM

For all we know he was googling to check out some real estate he was interested in, or directions to a restaurant he planned on trying, or he was just bored at work and dicking around on google. WRAL's coverage sucks and without seeing or reading the exact testimony myself I can't form an opinion on this evidence.

4/14/2011 8:43:08 AM

Are we blacked out again today?

4/14/2011 8:54:37 AM

Quote :

"WRAL's coverage sucks"

bottom line right here

4/14/2011 9:22:29 AM

National Enquirer > Fox News > WRAL

4/14/2011 9:24:46 AM

Could someone fill me in on the cell phone/laptop ban? Maybe it extends to a internet feed ban as well? As I understand it the judge got pissed that some part of the proceedings was tweeted, but save the undercover agent testimonies the whole trial had been streamed. How is a random tweet going to stir the pot on a televised trial?

I can't imagine the tweet identified an undercover agent. It's my understanding that the only reason they kill the feed is to protect the identity of the person giving testimony, not to hide the testimony itself so I fail to see the problem with the tweet - fully admitting I have no idea what was in that tweet. Must have missed something, hoping I could get the details.

4/14/2011 9:28:15 AM

guessing it will be another blackout day

4/14/2011 9:28:32 AM

I'm not sure what caused the judge to be so anti twitter, maybe because people were talking bad about him so it got his panties in a wad.

WRAL tweeted this a little bit ago:

Quote :

"Yes, we plan to livestream #coopertrial once this FBI witness is done. RT @HalfaSlice: @wral Will livefeed start back up after this witness?"

4/14/2011 9:31:22 AM

Quote :

"ILL ALLOW IT"

4/14/2011 10:03:57 AM

well this testimony seems pretty damning however i though there was some other testimony that brad and Nancy were looking to buy a new house in this area. Could that be the reason for his Google map search?

4/14/2011 10:20:36 AM

really? in the middle of a divorce?

4/14/2011 10:27:10 AM

to me, while suspicious, it isn't damning, to me.

i google map my home area probably 3x a week. Unless the man zoomed in behind the dirt mound where she was found, I don't see how mapping a zip code even remotely suggests guilt.

4/14/2011 10:32:00 AM

Quote :

"really? in the middle of a divorce? "

Maybe he was looking for a house for himself? Wasn't he going to sell the house they were living in?
Although I think its more likely he just googled something that happened to be in the area

4/14/2011 10:34:59 AM

I thought there was testimony about some weird thing that they would divorce and she would live nearby and work as his nanny. So looking at real estate in a zip code would make sense.

[Edited on April 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM. Reason : R]

4/14/2011 10:35:14 AM

oh, right

and maybe she decided to run over there to check it out

4/14/2011 10:41:29 AM