agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The democrats pushed through the legislation that forced banks to write bad loans" |
1) you still have not shown in any thread how any legislation"forced" banks to write bad loans 2) seeing as Republicans have been in charge of Congress for most of the last 14 years, I find it hard to believe the Democrats could really force anything too controversial through10/16/2008 11:16:49 AM |
terpball All American 22489 Posts user info edit post |
GOP is getting slimier than usual
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/virginia_gop_mailer_appears_to.php
Seriously? 10/16/2008 11:32:37 AM |
eyedrb All American 5853 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "poor people give people jobs by buying stuff
without poor people walmart wouldnt exist
" |
haha, and where do they get thier money?
here you go agent http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
[Edited on October 16, 2008 at 12:22 PM. Reason : .]10/16/2008 12:21:21 PM |
wilso All American 14657 Posts user info edit post |
plumbers' union: we endorse obama
http://www.ua.org/ua_endorses.asp
lol 10/16/2008 12:23:12 PM |
Gamecat All American 17913 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The democrats pushed through the legislation that forced banks to write bad loans" |
And the republicans pushed through legislation that rewarded them for doing so with billions of dollars.
Was there some kind of point to this?10/16/2008 12:28:47 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "tax breaks for coorporations? Oh no
When was the last time a poor person gave someone a job?" |
I don't know about poor people, but middle class small businesses occasionally give people jobs.
In any case, there's no real evidence that Obama's plan will hurt jobs. It's more like an entropic system, where jobs may be lost in one area, but they are gained in another area.
You realize in 1955 unemployment was at its low point, but the marginal tax rate was 90%. If taxes hurt employment significantly, it would certainly show up in the unemployment numbers, but there is no correlation.10/16/2008 12:41:03 PM |
Dentaldamn All American 9974 Posts user info edit post |
well nyc is about to loose 165,000 jobs
heereee weeee gooooooooooooooo! 10/16/2008 12:51:52 PM |
LunaK LOSER :( 23634 Posts user info edit post |
wow, really?
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_webbuck1.e7982b.html 10/16/2008 4:46:30 PM |
JCASHFAN All American 13916 Posts user info edit post |
^ OMG, racists outside the South!!!!!!!!!!!!1 10/16/2008 4:49:12 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
interesting article about obama's tax plan and small businesses
http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/15/smallbusiness/small_biz_taxes_factcheck.smb/index.htm?cnn=yes
Quote : | "Should small business owners fear for their wallets if Obama is elected? Not the vast majority, business and tax experts say." |
[Edited on October 16, 2008 at 4:54 PM. Reason : .]10/16/2008 4:54:27 PM |
Socks`` All American 11792 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "middle class small businesses" |
-moron
What the heck is a "middle class" small business????
All this talk about small businesses, I think people should surf on over to http://www.sba.gov to get the low down.
The Small Business Administration is the government arm in charge of setting criteria for what is considered a "small business". The criteria varies by industry, but typically the rule is basically that if a business has fewer 500 employees or fewer, they are considered "small". (note: there are no other distinction, "middle class" or otherwise).
What isn't clear to me, is why Obama or any other progressive thinks that a company with 501 employees should be treated differently than one with 499. Apparently the former is evil and out to kill our culture, while the other is just like those mom and pop country stores they saw on Andy Griffith.
bah.
[Edited on October 16, 2008 at 5:11 PM. Reason : ``]10/16/2008 5:10:05 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
Socks most of these people have government jobs, they're not interested in learning how most of America works in the private sector 10/16/2008 5:11:48 PM |
A Tanzarian drip drip boom 10995 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | " Oh, and [McCain] also wants the government to purchase everyone's house who is foreclosing." |
I couldn't believe that shit.10/16/2008 5:21:05 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "What isn't clear to me, is why Obama or any other progressive thinks that a company with 501 employees should be treated differently than one with 499. Apparently the former is evil and out to kill our culture, while the other is just like those mom and pop country stores they saw on Andy Griffith. " |
Our gov. uses "brackets" for things rather than variable functions because there are lots of people who don't get functions.
In any case, I did make up the term middle class small businesses, but the point I was trying to make was that most small businesses by a WIDE margin are better off under Obama than McCain because OBamas tax cut doesn't cater to the very wealthy or large corporations.10/16/2008 5:23:50 PM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
10/16/2008 5:24:02 PM |
Socks`` All American 11792 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "In any case, there's no real evidence that Obama's plan will hurt jobs. It's more like an entropic system, where jobs may be lost in one area, but they are gained in another area.
You realize in 1955 unemployment was at its low point, but the marginal tax rate was 90%. If taxes hurt employment significantly, it would certainly show up in the unemployment numbers, but there is no correlation." |
-moron
Incorrect. The highest personal income tax bracket was around 90%, but that is not the marginal tax rate for everyone in America. Indeed, the marginal tax rate would have differed by individual depending on how much they were making and what the tax rate structure looked like.
But this is really beside the point. It isn't a question about job creation, it's a question about wealth creation.10/16/2008 5:33:08 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | " Incorrect. The highest personal income tax bracket was around 90%, but that is not the marginal tax rate for everyone in America. Indeed, the marginal tax rate would have differed by individual depending on how much they were making and what the tax rate structure looked like." | em
Obviously I was referring to the top marginal tax rate, but the specific number is irrelevant to the idea eyedrb was trying to put forth that employment would suffer under Obama. Emplyoment could very well suffer, but there's no evidence at all that it will.
Quote : | "But this is really beside the point. It isn't a question about job creation, it's a question about wealth creation." |
Incorrect. We were talking about employment at that point in the thread.10/16/2008 5:38:33 PM |
ShinAntonio Zinc Saucier 18947 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/16/massive-rnc-robocall-may_n_135348.html
Beat that horse McCain. 10/16/2008 6:04:18 PM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "If the economy gets any worse Obama is just going to concede to McCain and be like "You know what? Fuck it. Fix your own damn mess." |
Looks like someone is not familiar with the concept of buy low, sell high10/16/2008 7:17:00 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
aaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahhahahaha thats good stuff
10/16/2008 7:18:03 PM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53063 Posts user info edit post |
I like how Obama is keeping things positive. I mean, just today, he released a new ad bashing McCain, using footage from last night's debate. Stay classy, Obama. Only 3 more weeks of lying through your teeth to the American people. Then you can start fucking the little guy in the ass while you rob his bank account 10/16/2008 7:29:18 PM |
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
10/16/2008 8:09:29 PM |
Boone All American 5237 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "TreeTwista10: Socks most of these people have government jobs, they're not interested in learning how most of America works in the private sector" |
hahahaha
says the guy who does nothing but post while at work.
I think I have a pretty good idea of how things work in the private sector.
Quote : | "I like how Obama is keeping things positive." |
I do, too. I'd feel incredibly embarrassed if my candidate were running 100% negative ads
[Edited on October 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM. Reason : ]10/16/2008 8:09:51 PM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53063 Posts user info edit post |
you should be embarassed. your candidate is spending more money on negative ads than his opponent's entire advertising budget. Of course, if your candidate had kept his word... Nah, that's not a problem. You know you can trust everything else he has promised in his campaign 10/16/2008 10:36:15 PM |
carzak All American 1657 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "your candidate is spending more money on negative ads than his opponent's entire advertising budget. " |
10/16/2008 11:11:05 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^^ how is it that you can get that 30% > 100% but you don't seem to grasp why a flat tax is less fair to poor people? 10/16/2008 11:18:29 PM |
carzak All American 1657 Posts user info edit post |
Letterman is putting the heat on McCain right now. Look for that on Youtube. 10/17/2008 12:22:18 AM |
StillFuchsia All American 18941 Posts user info edit post |
^ I could almost feel the discomfort through my screen 10/17/2008 12:30:26 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "I'd feel incredibly embarrassed if my candidate were running 100% negative ads" |
NBC pwnt obama's claim immediately after the debate...they showed clips of not only mccain campaign ads that did nothing but mention positive things about mccain (and nothing negative about obama), but they showed an ad where the only thing mccain did was congratulate obama on his historic position
but i'm sure most of you would rather just blindly believe obama's imaginary 100% number]10/17/2008 12:33:34 AM |
hooksaw All American 16500 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Look, John's last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S." |
--Joe "Plugs" Biden, The Human Gaffe Machine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq-eeWow_WU
Sweet Jesus, what a douche.
[Edited on October 17, 2008 at 12:36 AM. Reason : Say it ain't so, Joe "Plugs"! ]10/17/2008 12:34:28 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^^ i actually caught that part of the debate, and I was puzzled why McCain didn't defend himself better. I hope that's now how he'd defend the country if he were president. 10/17/2008 12:37:13 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
mccain immediately claimed it wasnt true, twice...no sense in spending much more time dispelling a blatant lie when there are so many lies out there 10/17/2008 12:42:44 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^ the point of a debate is to debate something like that. If it's blatantly untrue, that's even better, because he has reality on his side (something Republicans have been lacking recently). 10/17/2008 12:44:05 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
no, you dont need to waste your time arguing something thats obviously false to anyone with common sense...kind of like how you dont need to waste your time trying to reason with a dictator who obviously cant think rationally and wants to wipe israel off the map
100% negative ads? how does anyone believe that shit?] 10/17/2008 12:46:22 AM |
carzak All American 1657 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "they showed clips of not only mccain campaign ads that did nothing but mention positive things about mccain (and nothing negative about obama), but they showed an ad where the only thing mccain did was congratulate obama on his historic position" |
Were the ads currently running?10/17/2008 12:47:36 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^^ I guess if you want to lose an election, you can just let someone make-up things about you too.
And negotiations seemed to work well for N. Korea.
[Edited on October 17, 2008 at 12:48 AM. Reason : ] 10/17/2008 12:47:58 AM |
hooksaw All American 16500 Posts user info edit post |
The Obama Thugocracy Goes After Joe the Plumber
http://townhall.com/Columnists/LorieByrd/2008/10/17/the_obama_thugocracy_goes_after_joe_the_plumber
Why do Obama-Joe "Plugs" and the MSM hate Joe the Plumber? 10/17/2008 12:52:39 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^ I don't think anyone "hates" him but if he's going to go on national TV and lie about what he does, he should be prepared for some scrutiny.
In any case, he's already admitted, as has been pointed out in another thread, that he just felt on his own that despite what Obama's been saying, he's just going to raise his taxes anyway. This type of delusion seems to be pretty common among the right. They don't hate Obama based on what he says or his policies, they hate him based on made-up policies they ascribe to him in their version of reality. 10/17/2008 12:56:57 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "They don't hate Obama based on what he says or his policies" |
FALSE
however his supporters simply dismiss anything he says as "out of context" and claim his policies will work, despite being proven around the world to not work10/17/2008 12:58:31 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "despite being proven around the world to not work" |
what specifically are you referring to here?
I haven't seen anyone, especially not on TWW, user reality to show specific parts of any of Obama's policies couldn't work.10/17/2008 1:00:10 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148439 Posts user info edit post |
nationalized programs? elements of socialism? all his programs are great ideas, but they don't work in reality, and none of his supporters seem to realize that, they just see the smoke and mirrors 10/17/2008 1:02:01 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
^ you seem to have mistook the meaning of "proven around the world" with "asserted based on my own delusions."
What nationalized programs of Obamas? His gov. insurance company doesn't nationalize anything, it's a new competitive entity. And McCain seems to love nationalizing the banks, he even suspended his campaign to make that happen.
The US is ALREADY socialist in many ways, and has been that way for decades, and we're the greatest country on the planet as a result. 10/17/2008 1:05:12 AM |
hooksaw All American 16500 Posts user info edit post |
I guarantee you, moron, that if I lined up a random, say, ten self-described Obama supporters they couldn't (1) name three accomplishments of his and (2) couldn't articulate why they support him--other than abstract concepts such as "change," hope," or "yes, we can." Some might even be candid enough to reveal that they are supporting him because their skin color matches. 10/17/2008 1:17:18 AM |
roddy All American 25834 Posts user info edit post |
10/17/2008 1:18:19 AM |
carzak All American 1657 Posts user info edit post |
Well that's reassuring.10/17/2008 1:18:27 AM |
Ytsejam All American 2588 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The US is ALREADY socialist in many ways, and has been that way for decades, and we're the greatest country on the planet as a result." |
Or, we could be even greater without some of that socialism...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Excellent oped on WSJ. The Republicans have completely sheared away from what use to be the core principles of the party, now people are going to vote in a government that isn't really in tune with their views, they are just tired of the Republicans, woot. Obama easily skirts around a lot of the issues by being tremendously vague, or flat out lies about what he will do, which I think we will see this to be true, especially if the Dems do get a supermajority in the Senate.
I dislike Dole, but I will probably vote for her to try and keep over 40 Republicans in the Senate. I wish I could vote for McCain, but he is to old, and Palin is to religious/crazy and the possibility of him dieing in the next 4 years is to high. bah. Don't think I will vote for either major party candidate.
This picture is fucking awesome, makes me want to vote for McCain. haha
[Edited on October 17, 2008 at 1:23 AM. Reason : .]10/17/2008 1:22:17 AM |
hooksaw All American 16500 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Well that's reassuring." |
carnak the clueless
Can you refute my points?10/17/2008 2:11:50 AM |
marko Tom Joad 72828 Posts user info edit post |
10/17/2008 2:11:52 AM |
marko Tom Joad 72828 Posts user info edit post |
i would encourage anyone up right now to tune in to pbs' frontline right now
biopics on mccain and obama
my god i miss 2000 mccain
[Edited on October 17, 2008 at 2:14 AM. Reason : :-(] 10/17/2008 2:13:44 AM |
hooksaw All American 16500 Posts user info edit post |
10/17/2008 2:14:07 AM |