User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Digital SLR Page 1 ... 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 ... 224, Prev Next  
PhotogRob
All American
2009 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"It's not really a crop thing...you need to rotate the canvas just 1-2 degrees to straighten the horizon. Then crop out the damaged corners."


I suppose you could do it in 2 steps if you wanted to, but if you're going to "crop out the damaged corners" anyways, why not just crop & rotate using only the crop tool in 1 step in photoshop? Doing it this way lets you fine tune precisely how much you rotate the canvas so you don't have to guess if it's 1 degree or 2 degrees or somewhere in between.

^ I'm guessing you meant Auto White Balance (AWB) and not Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB)? It's a real pain to color correct images in bulk when they're shot with auto white balance b/c the camera can change the color temp from one picture to the next. Even if you set the white balance for your outdoor shots to a preset like tungsten, it'd be easier to correct because at least the photos would be equally as out-of-whack, so you could use the same correction on all your photographs.

[Edited on September 22, 2008 at 7:33 AM. Reason : ]

9/22/2008 7:17:45 AM

ambrosia1231
eeeeeeeeeevil
76471 Posts
user info
edit post

went to the zoo yesterday

Everything was taken with the telephoto that came with the camera (not a kit; I got said camera from ebay), and man, I can tell. These pictures were so terrible. I took 470; I have sorted through 344 of them, and have 12 worth uploading. And then shooting through safety glass doesn't help matters either





Jvp, I just looked at your WY pics from the last page.
1) Holy shit those are awesome
2) Holy shit I hate you and want to be there

[Edited on September 22, 2008 at 12:39 PM. Reason : lsjd]

9/22/2008 12:37:06 PM

Nighthawk
All American
19623 Posts
user info
edit post

I shot this one Saturday at Oceana NAS Airshow. Was using a Nikon D80 + 55-300 mm lens.



[Edited on September 22, 2008 at 1:30 PM. Reason : ]

9/22/2008 1:29:32 PM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/50mm-f14-afs.htm

Nikon announces an AF-S version of the 50mm f/1.4.

Benefits:
Can be used with D40/D40x/D60.
Auto/Manual focus ring allows adjustment of focus at any time, without fiddling with a switch.

Drawbacks:
Not coming out until December.
Estimated $440 introductory price.

9/22/2008 1:58:18 PM

Kiwi
All American
38546 Posts
user info
edit post

^Sweet!

http://consumerist.com/5053015/canons-rebate-program-is-blurry-and-poorly-lit

9/22/2008 2:28:07 PM

Joie
begonias is my boo
22491 Posts
user info
edit post

thanks for the tips guys but that was a quality of the picture i thought was cool (the crookedness of the horizon)
what can i say?
makes it look real.
im a sucker for imperfections.



[Edited on September 22, 2008 at 7:52 PM. Reason : sfdfd]

9/22/2008 7:51:22 PM

chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

i was not aware there was a such thing as a 55-300? who makes that?

9/22/2008 8:02:20 PM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Saw this on ScubaBoard -- http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/cave-diving/253823-ginnie-she-sure-purdy.html

Right now the river levels in north Florida are up due to the recent tropical storms so the springs have slowed down due to the hydrostatic pressure of the increased river levels. Red (tannic) river water from the Santa Fe River is running over the crystal clear output of the Devil's Eye opening to the Devil's cave system at Ginnie Springs, creating this gorgeous scenery...

9/22/2008 8:54:13 PM

Kiwi
All American
38546 Posts
user info
edit post

Some more awesome photography;

http://www.brianbielmann.com/index.html

9/22/2008 9:00:16 PM

Senez
All American
8112 Posts
user info
edit post







[Edited on September 22, 2008 at 9:51 PM. Reason : ahahaha, look at the doberman's nuts in the one picture...christ]

9/22/2008 9:50:19 PM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2880278711_765343bd55.jpg?v=0"


Yeah, time to get that dog neutered...

9/22/2008 10:15:01 PM

greeches
Symbolic Grunge
2604 Posts
user info
edit post

Nikon just rocks!

9/22/2008 10:22:30 PM

melaut
Veteran
267 Posts
user info
edit post

Charles - send me one of yours, and i'll make it look like that diver picture.

9/23/2008 12:00:04 AM

dannydigtl
All American
18302 Posts
user info
edit post

My first day w/ a DSLR (Nikon D40)
http://picasaweb.google.com/dan.durusky/FirstDayWithDSLRNikonD40#

I suck

9/23/2008 1:14:38 AM

Kiwi
All American
38546 Posts
user info
edit post

Your night shots are better than mine, did you use a tripod? What setting?

All I see is some sharpening on your composition, your DOF is good IMO.

What city do you live in? I'd have a field day with those photo ops!

9/23/2008 1:16:45 AM

tdwhitlo
All American
1347 Posts
user info
edit post

ambrosia - what kind of cam were u using and how much was it on ebay?

9/23/2008 1:19:10 AM

dannydigtl
All American
18302 Posts
user info
edit post

^^I just moved to Brisbane, Australia. yeh, very nice place. Its just now turning into spring here so i expect things to green up and really come to life in the next month or so.

For every semi-infocus night shot, i had 100 blurry shits. hah I don't yet have a tripod, but for the pic of the boat at night, i rested the camera on top of a fence post. This camera/lense doesnt have any image stabilization and its proving to be pretty challenging.

I have a couple noob questions. When i was shooting at dusk and night, the pics came out much brighter/lighter than the actual night. Like in that boat pic, the sky looks dark blue, but it was pretty close to pitch black in person. Also a lot of my dusk shots turned out like bright, vibrant, sunny day shots. Is this the whole point? What if i wanted a real black looking night sky?

Any tips for shooting in bright noontime sun? Is it best avoided? Almost all of my bright day shots were kinda overexposed and washed out.

9/23/2008 1:41:25 AM

JBaz
All American
16764 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"^ I'm guessing you meant Auto White Balance (AWB) and not Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB)? It's a real pain to color correct images in bulk when they're shot with auto white balance b/c the camera can change the color temp from one picture to the next. Even if you set the white balance for your outdoor shots to a preset like tungsten, it'd be easier to correct because at least the photos would be equally as out-of-whack, so you could use the same correction on all your photographs."

I shot at preset white balance of cloudy, but because of the weather condition and changing every 5 minutes its just a guessing game. Pretty much every 5 or so pics, the color balance could be off by 1500+ kelvin so I can't use the same presets for everything. And yes, I mean the AWB but the auto detect in cs3 raw not in the camera. 90% of the time it guesses pretty good when I do use it, specially with speed lights since those can throw some crazy temps at different power outputs.

9/23/2008 1:51:50 AM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

I was at a store yesterday and in the sale bin they had an EOS Kiss Digital X for 54,800 yen. I think that's around $500 these days.

Does anyone have experience with these cameras. Are these cameras worthwhile at all? Is that even a good price?

9/23/2008 5:18:55 AM

kdawg(c)
Suspended
10008 Posts
user info
edit post

just bought a Canon EOS XSi with the 75-300mm lens (as well as the 15-55mm lens)

getting a feel for it now...but...

I JUST MOVED TO HAWAI'I!!!

planning on taking mucho pictures!

9/23/2008 5:43:29 AM

chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

haven't heard much of the kiss. i thought it was just a special version of the original digital rebel. which actually didn't have anything special about it. i dunno google it.

9/23/2008 7:20:30 AM

Colemania
All American
1081 Posts
user info
edit post

grrrrr -for 500 you should get yourself a d40, rebel XT or even look into pentax. 500 for an original rebel is too much

9/23/2008 2:23:35 PM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

According to this, it's the name for the Japenese version of the XTi.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06082416canoneos400drebelxti.asp

9/23/2008 3:13:48 PM

capncrunch
All American
546 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"what's that kind of lens that produces the effect of making photos look like they're taken of scale-down miniatures? im trying to think of it but i just cant."


Tilt-shift. you need a pretty spensive lens. you can use a vijtage one too, but i think those are shift-but-not-tilt.

http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Camera-Lenses/Manual/Perspective-Control.page?cont_cat_id=fa7e1tck


Quote :
"I have a couple noob questions. When i was shooting at dusk and night, the pics came out much brighter/lighter than the actual night. Like in that boat pic, the sky looks dark blue, but it was pretty close to pitch black in person. Also a lot of my dusk shots turned out like bright, vibrant, sunny day shots. Is this the whole point? What if i wanted a real black looking night sky?"


so the camera tries to meter the exposure by averaging the amount of light over the metering area (which is anoption you set - matrix, spot, or center-weighted) and guessing that it is coming off of the equivalent of a flat 18% grey card. (I'm sure I have that # wrong btw...). So when you meter off of a light thing ( a white wall, maybe) the camera is guessing wrong about the target's light reflection and the camera will underexpose the shot. Take a picture of the sky at night and it comes out too bright.

press the +/- button and turn the thumbwheel to the right to tell the camera that you want to underexpose the shot. I am in the habit of taking a shot or two ,checking the Lcd, then correcting the exposure or white balance



[Edited on September 23, 2008 at 8:18 PM. Reason : . .]

9/23/2008 8:05:35 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ Yeah, I think you might be right.

9/23/2008 8:16:24 PM

chocolatervh
All American
22986 Posts
user info
edit post

ah, i've seen the name kiss associated with an original digital rebel. guess its just one of those things that canon has too. just another name.

why can't they just pick a friggin name!

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos300d/

thats the one i was thinking about.

9/23/2008 8:42:35 PM

PhotogRob
All American
2009 Posts
user info
edit post

Ok, I didn't think I'd upgrade to the new Canon 5D mkII, but HOLY CRAP this amazes me!


http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/09/22/without-further-ado-reverie/
http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/09/20/something-very-interesting-is-comingboth-to-this-blog-and-to-our-industry/

9/23/2008 11:30:01 PM

pezking
All American
3561 Posts
user info
edit post

I'll take one each of the lenses used too!

9/23/2008 11:37:50 PM

Ronny
All American
30652 Posts
user info
edit post

Oh dear...



Wow...



This changes everything.

9/24/2008 12:14:27 AM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Charles - send me one of yours, and i'll make it look like that diver picture."

Haha, none of mine are in any condition to even start looking like that. Most shots of me at Ginnie are with cheap point & shoot cameras.

edit: ...that video was crazy...

[Edited on September 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM. Reason : ]

9/24/2008 12:32:14 AM

Prospero
All American
11662 Posts
user info
edit post

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10049153-39.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5

Quote :
"Phase One is fleshing out its transformation from a maker of high-end image sensors for others' cameras into a maker of full-on cameras.

At the Photokina camera show in Germany, the company announced "successful alliances" with Leica Camera, Mamiya, and Hartblei to bring third-party lenses to its Phase One 645 camera system, and it said it will begin selling several lenses of its own by the end of the year. Those lens models are a 28mm f4.5, a 45mm f2.8, an 80mm f2.8, a 120mm f4.0, a 150mm f2.8, and a 75-150mm f4.5 zoom.

The professional camera, with a 60-megapixel sensor and a starting price of $41,990, is also due to ship by the end of the year. Coming in the first quarter of 2009 will be an 80mm leafshutter lens and a vertical grip.

The company also announced at the camera show an upgrade to the professional version of its its raw-image editing software.

Also new from the company is a 15-megapixel sensor mode for the 60-megapixel sensor. This mode combines four pixels into one that measures 12 microns square, extending the sensitivity range to ISO 1600. "

9/24/2008 12:36:08 AM

Senez
All American
8112 Posts
user info
edit post

Holy sh...

I want one of those.

[Edited on September 24, 2008 at 8:44 AM. Reason : the mkII that is.]

9/24/2008 8:44:07 AM

NCSongGirl
All American
544 Posts
user info
edit post

I bought the Canon Rebel XTi about a year ago and really like it. I had used the film version of the Canon Rebel and had liked it, so that is a major reason I got it in the digital over other similar brands. As a whole I really like it though as it's fairly easy to tote but still does a whole lot for the price.

9/24/2008 10:00:01 AM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Bump...can't have this getting off the first page.

9/24/2008 1:50:57 PM

JBaz
All American
16764 Posts
user info
edit post

Sweet, got my photo pass to cover hurricane games at RBC this season! This is totally gonna be awesome. Probably going to their pre-season game Sunday to take some test shots to get a feel for the place. I'll end up taking my MF camera to knock out some school assignments as well.

9/24/2008 5:06:10 PM

Ronny
All American
30652 Posts
user info
edit post

COOL!

9/24/2008 11:20:20 PM

JBaz
All American
16764 Posts
user info
edit post

woah... just realized that Gregg Forwerck shoots for the Carolina Hurricanes. I remember reading about him last year on the Alien Bee's website for using their equipment. The guy is a big name in Baseball. Would be cool to meet him.

9/25/2008 2:07:25 AM

Colemania
All American
1081 Posts
user info
edit post



No clue why I like this shot so much. I just took it tonight when I was on my way in from doing some night/city pics. Total after thought but I like the dark grass and black background. Noob, I know.

9/25/2008 3:13:50 AM

raiden
All American
10505 Posts
user info
edit post

I have got to learn how to take baller ass pictures like the ones in this thread.

9/25/2008 3:14:29 AM

JBaz
All American
16764 Posts
user info
edit post

simple, just make sure you have the "ass" and "balls" first, then add a "camera".

9/25/2008 3:25:28 AM

raiden
All American
10505 Posts
user info
edit post

lol well played.

9/25/2008 3:28:07 AM

Bweez
All American
10849 Posts
user info
edit post

I completely forgot about this thread.

anyway.

on campus a few days ago:




I keep saying to myself, "maybe I'll get the 70-200 2.8 next."

then I look it up on bh and see the price tag and laugh.

it's happened a few times.

[Edited on September 25, 2008 at 5:11 AM. Reason : fsdfsd]

9/25/2008 5:08:24 AM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Doesn't matter; they're always out of stock anyway.

9/25/2008 9:47:47 AM

Ronny
All American
30652 Posts
user info
edit post

^^Considering the quality of the lens and how it is one of the more essential lenses, I think it is relatively cheap. If you don't get the VR, of course.

9/25/2008 10:47:25 AM

Bweez
All American
10849 Posts
user info
edit post

Oh I probably will end up getting it next, especially if I start doing more concert and sports photography, which it looks like I will be, shooting for the UM yearbook and a concert blog-esque site i've been in touch with.

Unless I do the tokina fisheye 10-17 first, which is tempting.

I'm just not grasping buying a lens that's twice as expensive as my camera quite yet


especially since the equipment room on campus has one for free, but I can only get that for sports and not concerts, which will be the majority of my shooting.

I'll probably take the plunge around christmas or later.


the 85L is pretty sexy too but even more expensive, anyone have this one?

[Edited on September 25, 2008 at 11:21 AM. Reason : hfsd]

9/25/2008 11:18:27 AM

JSnail
All American
4844 Posts
user info
edit post

Didn't have my external flash hooked up, thus the harsh direct light.

Dakota wanted to help celebrate our win last weekend

9/25/2008 2:30:00 PM

dannydigtl
All American
18302 Posts
user info
edit post

hah awesome. that bird pic is awesome too, wow.

wtf is this thread in chitchat?

9/25/2008 11:22:31 PM

d7freestyler
Sup, Brahms
23935 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah, that bird pic is amazing!
excellent capture.

9/25/2008 11:28:16 PM

Bweez
All American
10849 Posts
user info
edit post

Thanks!

I really need to go out and shoot more, the U of Miami campus is a plethora of shots like this waiting to happen

I think i'll go tomorrow, no classes

[Edited on September 25, 2008 at 11:33 PM. Reason : fds]

9/25/2008 11:33:11 PM

pezking
All American
3561 Posts
user info
edit post

9/26/2008 3:07:26 PM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » Digital SLR Page 1 ... 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 ... 224, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.