pad to unbreak 10

[Edited on November 16, 2006 at 10:30 AM. Reason : (Shame to actually let this thread die, lest we all forget)]

11/16/2006 10:29:51 AM

Quote :

"yep...no fallacies in sarah's argument...harping over the same verbage over and over again without any thoughts about the overall subject...just obsessing over one quote and ignoring everything else "

ahhahahahahahaha.

1/9/2007 4:34:11 PM

^you dont realize that you do that too? more like pot calling kettle calling pot black

[Edited on January 9, 2007 at 4:38 PM. Reason : .]

1/9/2007 4:37:40 PM

Quote :

"TreeTwista10 Cash Rules 41538 Posts user info edit post nobody likes a tattletale "

http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=454501

1/9/2007 4:39:24 PM

Quote :

"dont suspend him "

?

1/9/2007 4:40:03 PM

1/10/2007 3:38:21 PM

Quote :

"I would call "5000 ppm" 5 ppt but thats just me "

1/12/2007 3:50:56 PM

that would be funnier if there was anything wrong with it

5,000 / 5,000,000 = 0.001 concentration
5 / 5,000 = 0.001

[Edited on January 12, 2007 at 5:08 PM. Reason : math for dummies]

1/12/2007 5:07:34 PM

^ Wouldn't it be 5 parts per billion?

1/13/2007 1:31:43 PM

no...its used to measure concentration...5 ppb would be a much much smaller concentration...its simple fractions

1/13/2007 6:18:36 PM

I'm drunk. Got blow?

1/13/2007 6:53:42 PM

hmm does ppt mean parts per trillion?

[Edited on January 13, 2007 at 9:35 PM. Reason : Oh duh parts per thousand]

1/13/2007 9:34:26 PM

ahahaha, thats like converting part measurements for a machinist in to tenths. what a retard.

1/13/2007 9:58:33 PM

holy shit is this thread still going?

oh wait, i see why.

he still doesnt shut up.

Quote :

" (parts per thousand) would be funnier if there was anything wrong with it 5,000 / 5,000,000 = 0.001 concentration 5 / 5,000 = 0.001 "

what a math whiz. i bet he can convert volumes into "deciliters" too.

1/13/2007 10:35:56 PM

do you use parts per million for nitrogen, oxygen and argon (the other main elements in the atmosphere) as well? do you say the atmosphere has 780,000 parts per million nitrogen? i guess you must not think co2 levels are a problem...i could have sworn you were another blindly accepting global warming proponent?

i'm sure i'm not the only one in this thread with an MEA degree

1/13/2007 10:42:05 PM

Quote :

"If you don't like the war so much why don't you join the military and go fight in the war so there will be more soldiers and therefore it will end quicker "

1/17/2007 12:51:01 PM

pad

the genius sober46an3 is still great at spotting sarcasm

[Edited on January 17, 2007 at 12:52 PM. Reason : .]

1/17/2007 12:52:01 PM

It's hard to differentiate sarcasm from stupidity on the internets.

And when reading a treetard post, it's much safer to assume it's the latter.

1/17/2007 4:29:09 PM

only idiots have trouble differentiating sarcasm from legitimate posts

you are one of those idiots boonedocks

1/17/2007 4:55:03 PM

Differentiating sarcasm from legitimate posts is easy

Differentiating sarcasm from stupidity isn't. This is why people are constantly misinterpreting your sarcasm.

[Edited on January 17, 2007 at 4:58 PM. Reason : .]

1/17/2007 4:58:01 PM

AHAHAHAHAHA

1/17/2007 5:00:06 PM

Quote :

"Differentiating sarcasm from stupidity isn't"

No, that is also easy

Don't blame me because of your own ineptness

1/17/2007 5:25:31 PM

So why is that 60% of the posts in the Soap Box are sarcasm, but you're the only one who people have a hard time with?

1/17/2007 5:31:52 PM

Why don't you ask them? I'm not the one who has a problem understanding sarcasm.

1/17/2007 5:33:34 PM