adultswim Suspended 8379 Posts user info edit post |
republicans are overwhelmingly voting for him, though 4/24/2016 1:03:00 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
Just about every Republican I know isn't voting for Trump, and doesn't want to vote for Cruz either. 4/24/2016 8:01:43 PM |
eleusis All American 24527 Posts user info edit post |
there's plenty of Republicans that won't vocally express support for Trump due to fears of backlash, but they are voting for him. 4/24/2016 9:46:31 PM |
krallum2016 All American 1356 Posts user info edit post |
8 page thread about 6 year olds pissing.
[Edited on April 25, 2016 at 9:56 AM. Reason : Surely this can't be reality.] 4/25/2016 9:56:43 AM |
Doss2k All American 18474 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Just about every Republican I know isn't voting for Trump, and doesn't want to vote for Cruz either." |
This is what I have noticed, but clearly plenty of people are and just not being vocal about it or straight lying.4/25/2016 10:01:50 AM |
GoldieO All American 1801 Posts user info edit post |
Back on topic. What is the definition of transgender? 5/11/2016 11:25:25 AM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
webster's Terdster's Dictionary: people with non-binary gender/sex identities whom conservative politicians feel compelled to demonize in order to unite their constituencies behind their visionless, mediocre leadership. See also "those people" and "them icky queers."
5/11/2016 12:01:26 PM |
GoldieO All American 1801 Posts user info edit post |
Incredibly beneficial contribution to the conversation. Thanks. 5/11/2016 12:04:04 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
I mean does google not work on your computer? Or are you trying to lay out some some trap for a legalese semantics argument that basically amounts to "transgender people don't exist"? 5/11/2016 12:08:43 PM |
beatsunc All American 10748 Posts user info edit post |
perhaps she going to make the point that the civil rights laws dont mention transgenders and obama admin makin shit up
[Edited on May 11, 2016 at 12:17 PM. Reason : congress should make new legislation to address the issue imo ] 5/11/2016 12:15:21 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
True, that is a legalese semantics argument,and I think you may be right about the ultimate outcome there.
But discriminating against a group of people because it hasn't expressly been forbidden by the Federal government isn't what I'd want to hang my hat on either. 5/11/2016 1:23:19 PM |
beatsunc All American 10748 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/education/article84889307.html
mecklenburg county giving middle finger to state legislators. will be interesting to see if they do anything about it. 6/22/2016 7:16:25 AM |
jtdenny All American 10904 Posts user info edit post |
The military might be at odds with the state now 7/1/2016 10:30:02 PM |
GoldieO All American 1801 Posts user info edit post |
BTTT. Anyone been following Professor Jordan Peterson from Univ. Toronto? If not, he's been speaking out against proposed legislation in Canada. His recent podcast with Joe Rogan is below - thought it may be relevant to this thread.
https://youtu.be/04wyGK6k6HE 12/8/2016 7:55:30 PM |
beatsunc All American 10748 Posts user info edit post |
^he was on tom woods too if someone wants 30 mins condensed version
http://tomwoods.com/ep-773-psychology-professor-resists-gender-identity-crowd-gets-attacked/
[Edited on December 10, 2016 at 6:46 PM. Reason : d] 12/10/2016 6:44:33 PM |
Kurtis636 All American 14984 Posts user info edit post |
He makes a lot of good points. Legislating language is a dangerous, dangerous precedent to set regardless of any good intentions that might be behind it (though in this case it's pretty clearly intended as a club to punish wrongthink). Hate speech laws, holocaust denial laws, blasphemy laws, mandating pronoun usage... they're all fucking horrible. 12/10/2016 11:12:08 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
All I'll say is that I'm glad someone is looking out for all those confused 4 year olds.
http://www.wral.com/transgender-day-camp-among-first-to-include-4-year-olds/16863684/
[Edited on August 7, 2017 at 1:53 PM. Reason : sda] 8/7/2017 1:42:04 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
oh heavens no
how dare a camp exists that lets kids be whoever they wanna be 8/7/2017 2:13:50 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
If a boy wants to wear a dress? Fine by me. My daughter plays with "boy" toys all the time. We don't fuss at her, we don't tell her it is wrong, but we also don't push it on her to go and try things outside her gender.
I have a feeling that's what these kids would get at this camp/daycare/whatever it is. 8/7/2017 2:26:01 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
This is real progress folks.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/23/entertainment/nicole-maines-supergirl/index.html
First transgender super hero. Gonna be a big hit. 7/23/2018 8:40:03 PM |
Dentaldamn All American 9974 Posts user info edit post |
are you upset everything isn’t made to specifically appeal to you? Or am I missing something. 7/23/2018 8:50:56 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
you against it? 7/23/2018 8:51:31 PM |
TerdFerguson All American 6600 Posts user info edit post |
Shoulda remade “Hedwig and the Angry Inch” instead. 7/23/2018 9:02:09 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
^^I guess I'm don't really care one way or the other. I mean we probably have had, over the years, over a hundred shows/movies about super heroes, and not one has been transgendered, so if you were to apply that to current population breakdowns, then I guess it is about time. Approximately .3 percent of the population is transgendered, so I would expect that .3 percent of superhero depictions in popular culture would also be transgendered. 7/23/2018 9:35:09 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
have you been interested in representation percentages in the past or is this your first foray into the field? 7/23/2018 11:23:33 PM |
synapse play so hard 60939 Posts user info edit post |
rjrumple is the King of saying "i don't really care...[BUT I OBVIOUSLY REALLY CARE]"
he's also at least pretty high up in the charts for "i don't like so and so...[BUT HERE'S A BUNCH OF WORDS DEFENDING SO AND SO] 7/23/2018 11:48:21 PM |
Dentaldamn All American 9974 Posts user info edit post |
Superheros make up 0.0 percent of the population.
[Edited on July 23, 2018 at 11:52 PM. Reason : O.O] 7/23/2018 11:51:25 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
^ you stole my next post 7/24/2018 12:11:26 AM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
^^That's usually when it comes to Trump, because I don't like him, but I also think some of the things that the media and the left does to him are going to hurt chances of a different president in 2020, so, while it may come off as defending Trump, I actually am defending the chance that we can change things in the next election.
This whole "lets throw a bunch of stories at the wall and hope it sticks" plan isn't working. It is all big news for a few days, it goes away, he still acts like Trump, and it all happens all over again 48 hours later.
He's like teflon Don. 7/24/2018 9:39:35 AM |
Bullet All American 28417 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | ""lets throw a bunch of stories at the wall and hope it sticks"" |
A lot of that is just called investigating and reporting. It's what journalists have always done.7/24/2018 9:57:59 AM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
But have you not noticed a pattern as to when these stories break? And when they do, there's a small whirlwind of "OMG did you see what he did now??" And then nothing. He'll tweet some stuff, his base goes nuts, the left goes nuts, nothing happens, and then he creates a new shitshow to cover up the last.
Rinse and repeat.
The only thing that could get him, maybe, is what is on those 12 recordings that Cohen has. But I doubt it. He's too well insulated in Congress, and pretty soon, on the SCOTUS as well. 7/24/2018 10:01:42 AM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/21/australia/laurel-hubbard-olympics-transgender-intl-hnk-spt/index.html
How is this even remotely fair? 6/21/2021 12:33:39 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
because the IOC and other governing bodies have a specific testosterone policy and she qualified under that policy
[Edited on June 21, 2021 at 12:44 PM. Reason : .] 6/21/2021 12:42:27 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
I'm sure that the years of competing/training on the male level hasn't given her any edge at all 6/21/2021 3:03:42 PM |
nacstate All American 3785 Posts user info edit post |
I'm not sure, so explain to me how you are sure.
Or am I (someone not making assertions of any kind) supposed to "do the research" to explain it to you (someone who is making assertions). 6/21/2021 3:23:28 PM |
rwoody Save TWW 37695 Posts user info edit post |
The Olympics: long known the pinnacle of "fairness" 6/21/2021 3:33:48 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ she transitioned 8 years ago and was eligible to compete in the 2016 Olympics but didn’t make the team
yet again, you’re letting your bigotry get in the way of logic
[Edited on June 21, 2021 at 3:53 PM. Reason : .] 6/21/2021 3:40:22 PM |
StTexan Suggestions??? 7148 Posts user info edit post |
Ppl born a male shouldn’t compete as women in olympics. Sorry not sorry. But you be you 6/22/2021 1:28:07 AM |
rwoody Save TWW 37695 Posts user info edit post |
Why not 6/22/2021 7:17:59 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148440 Posts user info edit post |
i think an obvious example would be that if someone like Usain Bolt decided to identify as a woman to run in the Olympics, it wouldn't be fair to the other competitors because they'd have no chance due to age physiological differences 6/22/2021 12:37:36 PM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
good thing there’s a much higher standard than only identifying, then 6/22/2021 12:44:00 PM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/21/australia/laurel-hubbard-olympics-transgender-intl-hnk-spt/index.html
How is this even remotely fair?" |
This person transitioned at the age of 35, having fully gone through adulthood as a male with testosterone, lifting the whole way and building the muscle/skeletal base of strength.
Transitions, becomes the best female division weightlifter in NZ, by far. Like, the 2nd place isn't close.
Crazy coincidence! Trans women are women though.
[Edited on June 22, 2021 at 2:24 PM. Reason : ]6/22/2021 2:06:19 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
^You're just being blinded by your bigotry. 6/23/2021 8:11:35 AM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "because the IOC and other governing bodies have a specific testosterone policy and she qualified under that policy" |
and that policy is BS because it puts a cap at testosterone of 10 nmol/L, but women born as females who are elite athletes don't go above 2 nmol/L. seriously, look at those numbers again.
yes, very fair.
it is stupendously ignorant and mind-boggling that so many 'woke' people today think that a man transitioning into a woman as a fully grown adult does not carry over massive physiological, morphological, and biomechanical advantages from having grown in the womb as a male (bathed in testosterone) and having gone through puberty and teenage years as a male. nor any advantages from all the training done as a male, which is far different from the training done by women, both in load and volume, which further widen the gap between men and women.
they really need to create a separate category for transgender men and women to compete in sports.
so many professional athletes have spoken up against her being allowed to compete with women... yes, it's because they are all 'transphobic' and hate trans people! just gotta be that... can't be any other reason! cancel them all for transsphobia!!!
it's just like if you criticize israhell, you are anti-semitic!
[Edited on June 23, 2021 at 11:40 AM. Reason : trans women are women but are MALES, and trans men are men but are FEMALES -- trans people say this!]6/23/2021 11:39:27 AM |
thegoodlife3 All American 39304 Posts user info edit post |
pretty fitting that the three users above this post are all in agreement
damn proud to not be in that club 6/23/2021 1:09:18 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
^ what a rebuttal.
some more observations about this issue and its discussion:
-- whenever i see some people on FB/Twitter/YT objecting to transgender people being allowed to compete with cisgender people, i never fail to also notice the extreme so-called 'woke' people resorting to ad hominem and attacking the characters of those objecting, rather than actually responding to their points. the usual snide remark is along the lines of, "oh you suddenly care about women's sports now" or "since you care about women so much, what have you done to help women?", with the undertone being "you are a misogynistic, religious nutjob who hates women so stop pretending that you care about women's sports". sure enough, some actually straight up say that. what makes these "woke" people think they can impute right-wing religious and political views upon the objectors? i thought "woke" people were logical and refrained from false accusations? not all people who object are right-wing. many are, indeed, liberals. but it's just easier to simply paint any objection as transphobia... makes the screaming at and insulting objectors easier.
-- talking of logic, another 'rebuttal' i frequently notice is along the lines of "but there are already stronger women and weaker women, so what about them?" or even asking how that natural variation in women is different from letting trans women compete against born-women. seriously, are y'all that ignorant and illogical?
-- caitlyn jenner: is she a self-loathing transphobe? is she a conservative, religious nutjob? that's what you "woke" people should say, right? pretty sure she knows a thing or two about being a trans woman and also competing in sports.
-- did y'all watch sarah silverman (she resorted to all the 'refutations' and personal attacks mentioned above) insult and excoriate jenner for saying trans women should not be allowed to compete with born women? she sounded utterly stupid and ignorant, made irrelevant and false comparisons and analogies, and couldn't even string a proper coherent thought together. i don't know who this rubin guy is, but his analysis of silverman's bizarre rant is spot on; listen to sarah and his breakdown of it: https://youtu.be/c_qnJQG5aGE?t=1241 that's a must listen to see the ugliness (and sheer stupidity and ignorance) inside her. 6/23/2021 2:56:48 PM |
rjrumfel All American 23027 Posts user info edit post |
The arguments for trans women competing with actual women (not gonna say cisgendered) is that testosterone can't be proven to give a competitive edge.
So if that's the case, why have any sport based on gender? Let women join the NFL. Let men compete in women's soccer.
Let's tear down those walls people! 6/24/2021 12:52:50 PM |
d357r0y3r Jimmies: Unrustled 8198 Posts user info edit post |
When you support women so much, you eliminate their opportunities to compete in sports.
Horseshoe theory strikes again. 6/24/2021 1:51:43 PM |
rwoody Save TWW 37695 Posts user info edit post |
What about cater semenya? Is it fair that she essentially has to take inhibitors? Is it fair that LeBron James gets to compete against men with lower t levels? If a man's t level is low enough should he compete with women? Should we eliminate gender from all categories and just have t levels like weight classes?
Quote : | "caitlyn jenner: is she a self-loathing transphobe? is she a conservative, religious nutjob? " |
Yes
Quote : | "you eliminate their opportunities to compete in sports." |
Side eye gif6/24/2021 2:35:39 PM |
0EPII1 All American 42541 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The arguments for trans women competing with actual women (not gonna say cisgendered) is that testosterone can't be proven to give a competitive edge." |
That's not what they say because otherwise they wouldn't have an upper limit on T levels. So, they acknowledge that T levels do confer an advantage, but the upper limit on T levels for trans women is several fold higher than the max level that is found in elite female athletes, which is very unfair.
The argument is that taking estrogen and/or T blockers for a year is enough to reverse the effects of your body bathing in T for decades, which is a completely anti-scientific and, frankly, very stupid argument. They say the advantages are eroded nearly completely by the hormone therapy. Fucking idiots.
It is simple: we need new categories for male women (trans women) and female men (trans men). Or maybe a single category for them. I wonder who would be better at sports requiring speed and/or strength, trans men or trans women.6/24/2021 4:16:53 PM |