^ sure. Articles have popped up from time where sources have admitted to being embarrassed work for the network. The most recent example of such articles was during the cheeseburger emoji thing.

11/29/2017 8:31:18 PM

Bathe yourself in the delusion: "THE FBI IS A SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THEY"RE ALL DEMOCRATS"
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/12/06/gregg-jarrett-mueller-probe-donald-trump-illegitimate-and-corrupt

12/7/2017 7:37:08 AM

which institutions do the democrats not control? at this point I'm convinced the democrat party = illuminati

12/7/2017 10:10:51 AM

The executive, legislative and judicial branches of the federal government?

12/7/2017 11:35:59 AM

^

12/7/2017 11:40:23 AM

pretty sure that was sarcasm

12/7/2017 11:55:52 AM

whoosh

12/7/2017 12:26:21 PM

The front page has two headline stories with the word "thug" in them:

Quote :

"HANGRY' HERMIT KINGDOM: Well-fed Kim sends thugs to steal farmers' food for his starving North Korean army"

Quote :

"MS-13 exports new wave of thugs amid Trump administration crackdown"

1/22/2018 1:03:39 PM

https://www.avclub.com/life-is-short-so-please-enjoy-a-video-of-sean-hannity-1822446490

Quote :

"Hannity dismisses NYT reporting bc Fox News sources couldn’t confirm it. Then Fox News sources confirms it. Hannity: “We’ll deal with this tomorrow night. We have a shocking video today to bring you by the way” and pivots to a car crash in Arizona. "

[Edited on January 26, 2018 at 11:04 AM. Reason : ]

1/26/2018 11:04:14 AM

Sean Hannity is a human piece of shit.

1/26/2018 11:33:55 AM

I'm seeing reports Shep Smith just got canned? The last person that could call themselves a journalist at faux news. Strange god damn times we are living in.

1/29/2018 7:29:38 PM

Just found out Laura Ingraham has brown children and is divorced. Who woulda thunk?

1/29/2018 11:02:48 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/08/george-w-bush-says-theres-pretty-clear-evidence-russia-meddled-in-2016-us-election.html

Read the comments

2/8/2018 9:20:01 AM

?

I looked at a handful. More anti-Trump comments than I would've expected for a Fox News article, but otherwise they seemed like fairly standard news article comments.

2/8/2018 10:30:43 AM

It's funny how they turn on him when he says one thing about russians (not Trump).

Wait...you mentioned Russians??? You're a librul!!!! rabble...rabble...rabble....

[Edited on February 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM. Reason : ]

2/8/2018 10:44:26 AM

Weird, I just quickly looked at the most recent comments and some were anti-trump.

When I first posted it and looked through the comments, they were all anti-GWB.

2/8/2018 10:54:22 AM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/08/informant-says-moscow-paid-millions-in-bid-to-influence-clinton.html

2/8/2018 1:56:55 PM

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/02/the-justice-department-has-apparently-debunked-the-gops-phony-uranium-one-scandal/

2/8/2018 2:54:33 PM

And yet it's still the headline story

2/8/2018 3:03:23 PM

But thanks to THE MEMO we know that the Justice Department is in Killary's pocket. Duh.

2/8/2018 3:04:29 PM

she lied and people died

2/8/2018 3:48:12 PM

@Cherokee - you don't have to post rebuttals to Fox News links here. The stories speak for themselves.

2/8/2018 7:52:00 PM

https://deadspin.com/fox-news-host-laura-ingraham-blows-the-dog-whistle-on-l-1823067638

racist piece of shit

2/16/2018 11:01:26 AM

http://insider.foxnews.com/tag/scott-baio

2/16/2018 11:54:25 AM

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1964232273608253&id=908009612563863

3/17/2018 10:16:42 AM

Wow, I never expected this pussy to say anything like this:

Quote :

"Retired U.S. Army officer Ralph Peters blasted Fox News in an email to colleagues explaining his decision earlier this month to not renew his contract with the network as a "strategic analyst." "Four decades ago, I took an oath as a newly commissioned officer," Peters wrote in the email, which was first reported by BuzzFeed. "I swore to 'support and defend the Constitution,' and that oath did not expire when I took off my uniform. Today, I feel that Fox News is assaulting our constitutional order and the rule of law, while fostering corrosive and unjustified paranoia among viewers. Over my decade with Fox, I long was proud of the association. Now I am ashamed." Peters continued: "In my view, Fox has degenerated from providing a legitimate and much-needed outlet for conservative voices to a mere propaganda machine for a destructive and ethically ruinous administration.""

https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2018/03/20/ashamed-fox-news-contributor-quits-blasts-propaganda-machine/23390981/

3/20/2018 8:06:11 PM

https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-americas-largest-local-tv-owner-turned-its-news-anc-1824233490

Quote :

"How America's Largest Local TV Owner Turned Its News Anchors Into Soldiers In Trump's War On The Media"

[Edited on April 2, 2018 at 11:27 AM. Reason : ]

4/2/2018 11:27:14 AM

i assume all of that goes back to the telecom act of '96?

4/2/2018 11:41:55 AM

Lol, there is seriously a segment called Bottom Line with Boris?

4/2/2018 2:19:05 PM

^^^

Quote :

" Dan Rather ?Verified account @DanRather News anchors looking into camera and reading a script handed down by a corporate overlord, words meant to obscure the truth not elucidate it, isn't journalism. It's propaganda. It's Orwellian. A slippery slope to how despots wrest power, silence dissent, and oppress the masses. "

LOL.

4/3/2018 12:37:36 PM

please, break down why you find that so funny

4/3/2018 1:04:28 PM

Perhaps it is the hypocrisy of Dan Rather saying it.

It's true, no doubt, but it is Dan Rather. You know, the same Dan Rather who reported fabricated information about Bush without doing any fact checking whatsoever.

4/3/2018 1:10:11 PM

you’re conflating two completely different things

4/3/2018 1:15:40 PM

Not really - Dan Rather just has no cred to get on his high horse and comment on corporate overlords pushing propaganda when likely (although not confirmed) the same kind of corporate overlords probably pushed him to come out with that report.

4/3/2018 1:21:28 PM

you’re still conflating two completely different things

4/3/2018 2:48:42 PM

http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/09/fox-news-accidentally-broadcast-graphic-showing-least-trusted-news-network-7452446/

4/9/2018 2:03:38 PM

https://news.avclub.com/stephen-colbert-blows-the-lid-off-of-tucker-carlsons-pa-1825166046

Quote :

"Sure, any Twitter wag or online jokester can call out blankly blinking Fox News propagandist Tucker Carlson for recently devoting airtime to the supposed predatory sex-and-violence exploits of panda bears in a transparently sweaty attempt to talk about anything but the fact that the home, office, and hotel room of the president’s personal attorney has been raided by the FBI. But it takes a real fake newsman to dig deeper for the truth. Or at least the truth that we are living in a reality created by comedy writers who’ve discovered that there’s really no point in restraint when it comes to political satire any more. On last night’s Late Show, Stephen Colbert took on what can only be called Pandagate (although Colbert went with Panda-monium), by revealing that Carlson’s ineptly diversionary “pandas would totally murder you if they weren’t piebald perverts” tactics can be traced right back—to Stephen Colbert. Or, rather, “Stephen Colbert,” the Late Show host’s former Colbert Report persona, who, in a clip from a 2011 episode of The Colbert Report, whipped up national outrage at these “cuddly cutthroat commies” who were—as shown in a certain animated sequel at the time—learning the deadly art of kung fu. Calling Carlson’s fear-foraging feint away from presidential disaster “literally something I did on my old show when I played an insane person,” Colbert went on to note their further similarity of “acting incredibly stupid while wearing an ill-fitting suit.”"

[Edited on April 11, 2018 at 11:54 AM. Reason : ]

4/11/2018 11:53:46 AM

lol

4/16/2018 3:20:15 PM

lol

4/16/2018 3:37:23 PM

Is there a prediction market yet for how long before Hannity is fired?

4/16/2018 3:44:36 PM

What did he do this time?

4/16/2018 4:16:49 PM

Hired Michael Cohen.

4/16/2018 4:39:11 PM

can someone explain why a guy having a lawyer is such a bombshell?

4/16/2018 8:10:18 PM

When did he hire him? Before or after Trump ran for president?

4/16/2018 8:17:09 PM

2017

4/16/2018 8:28:12 PM

He had three clients, two of the three used Cohen to make hush payments.

4/16/2018 8:44:11 PM

Hannity also interviewed Cohen on TV without disclosing their client/lawyer relationship. That’s fun too.

4/16/2018 9:40:15 PM

Hahaha, laughing my ass off at earl struggling with this

4/17/2018 6:35:35 AM

Luckily he isn’t a journalist and Fox already knows he has zero ethics. This will only get him higher ratings.

[Edited on April 17, 2018 at 8:19 AM. Reason : Unless he pulled an O’Reilly he’s fine.]

4/17/2018 8:18:53 AM

Quote :

" Unless he pulled an O’Reilly he’s fine"

isn't that what's being implied here? Cohen claimed he had 7 business partners and three legal clients, of which two supposedly used Cohen for blackmail payments to women they slept with. The third is Hannity, which seems to imply he's in the same boat with Trump and Broidy. People can't be getting this worked up just because Hannity used Cohen as a lawyer or resonably think Hannity is laundering money through real estate.

4/17/2018 12:15:04 PM