User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » 2016 Republican primary thread Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 33, Prev Next  
The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

Theyre going to take our guns and use them to shoot aborted babies and feed the parts to mexican rapists.

9/9/2015 2:42:47 PM

0EPII1
All American
42536 Posts
user info
edit post

Lol, such children

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/trump-fans-to-iran-deal-peaceniks-shut-the-f-k-up.html

9/10/2015 12:25:38 AM

eyewall41
All American
2261 Posts
user info
edit post

Huckabee says Dred Scott is still the law of the land. Holy shit! LOL

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/253292-huckabee-says-dred-scott-still-law-of-land

9/11/2015 12:26:51 PM

synapse
play so hard
60935 Posts
user info
edit post

http://gawker.com/the-collected-quotes-of-donald-trump-on-sexy-women-he-i-1730126883

9/11/2015 5:51:00 PM

eyewall41
All American
2261 Posts
user info
edit post

Rick Perry is out.

9/11/2015 11:11:40 PM

synapse
play so hard
60935 Posts
user info
edit post

Was he ever really in tho?

I know he was hoping to get wayyyyyy more mileage out of those glasses.

9/12/2015 12:19:13 AM

0EPII1
All American
42536 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Trump about his daughter: If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father . . . "





Quote :
"Oh, good, whew. I’m glad to see he got around to the being-her-father part. Eventually."
Quote :
"Like my personal opinion is that if “incest” is on the list of reasons you wouldn’t bang someone, it should always be at the top of that list?

But yeah sure like second is okay too I guess."

9/12/2015 2:30:03 AM

bbehe
Burn it all down.
18402 Posts
user info
edit post

So with Perry out, the JV debate drops down to 4 people (Jindal, Santorum, Pataki and Graham)...these guys got to realize they're pretty well fucked, right?

9/12/2015 11:19:50 AM

theDuke866
All American
52785 Posts
user info
edit post

The first 2 are probably waiting for electoral manna from heaven. if it's God's will that they win, that door will be opened, you know.

9/12/2015 12:02:40 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

I rather be in the jv devate and get to talk about issues than that 11 person debate where trump gets 50%of the airtime. After bush carson and fiorina i dont see the other 7 getting more than a few minutes to talk.

9/12/2015 4:38:48 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

they are running for a Fox News spot, book deals, speaking circuits, etc...

they know they won't get elected and don't care about that, it doesn't pay enough anyways

9/12/2015 9:10:23 PM

A Tanzarian
drip drip boom
10995 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah, it's questionable how earnest a large chunk of the Republican field really is. That's probably not a good thing.

9/13/2015 2:42:04 PM

eyewall41
All American
2261 Posts
user info
edit post

A letter from Gov Brown in CA to Dr. Ben Carson:



If you can't read that:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/COkwJsuUsAAxQUq.jpg:large

[Edited on September 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM. Reason : .]

9/15/2015 7:49:58 AM

GoldieO
All American
1801 Posts
user info
edit post

Because partisan politics had nothing to do with the sitting governor of one of our largest states sending out a letter to a presidential candidate from the other party regarding a partisan issue. I'm sure his constituents are now better off because of the time spent on this letter and subsequent efforts to publicize said letter.

When did people stop thinking around here and just reposting things that confirm their own bias?

9/15/2015 9:31:33 AM

TerdFerguson
All American
6599 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"regarding a partisan issue"


I think the point he is making is that accepting climate science shouldn't be a partisan issue . . . . . .

9/15/2015 9:37:20 AM

bbehe
Burn it all down.
18402 Posts
user info
edit post

I think the concern is that global warming shouldn't be a partisan issue.

9/15/2015 9:38:54 AM

GoldieO
All American
1801 Posts
user info
edit post

Fine, but I think we can agree his letter was clearly motivated by partisan politics, right? And unfortunately partisan politics infects everything. But let's not pretend calling out Republicans for not "accepting" human impact on global warming isn't itself a partisan issue.

9/15/2015 9:43:45 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

but isn't that Republicans fault for creating this religious ideology to deny and not even consider it in the face of any evidence

9/15/2015 9:56:51 AM

GoldieO
All American
1801 Posts
user info
edit post

Or is it the fault of leftist ideologues who have a religious devotion to AGW and won't consider any evidence to the contrary?

You see what I did there.

[Edited on September 15, 2015 at 10:01 AM. Reason : ...]

9/15/2015 10:01:23 AM

Shrike
All American
9594 Posts
user info
edit post

The problem is the "evidence" to the contrary has no scientific credibility.....

9/15/2015 10:17:21 AM

bbehe
Burn it all down.
18402 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Or is it the fault of leftist ideologues who have a religious devotion to AGW and won't consider any evidence to the contrary? "


I mean, I'll consider it, but something like 99.9% of peer reviewed studies support AGW.

9/15/2015 10:22:32 AM

A Tanzarian
drip drip boom
10995 Posts
user info
edit post

GoldieO is surprised that politicians gonna politick.

9/15/2015 10:32:09 AM

GoldieO
All American
1801 Posts
user info
edit post

No, I'm actually not.

9/15/2015 10:36:53 AM

A Tanzarian
drip drip boom
10995 Posts
user info
edit post

You're upset that politicians are gonna politick?

9/15/2015 10:45:55 AM

Bullet
All American
28336 Posts
user info
edit post

you're a bigot if you call-out bigots for being bigoted.....

9/15/2015 10:57:22 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"You see what I did there."

yeah, you made a false equivalency

there are people on the left who have an ideology that goes beyond what is based in fact, but the reason this is a false equivalency is because this is not a significant party position and does not impact legislation or international agreements to anywhere near the degree that the right does.

the right has made climate change denial part of their american-flag-jesus brand of religion, they have embraced and encouraged that, so they don't get to then criticize people for pointing that out

9/15/2015 11:38:05 AM

thegoodlife3
All American
39221 Posts
user info
edit post

sorry, I am unable to present you evidence that shows why you are wrong in fear of being accused of politicking

now go on and give out as much misinformation as you can

9/15/2015 12:36:04 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
50085 Posts
user info
edit post

Struggling still to understand how any person can look at Trumps behavior and be like, "that. that is what I want to represent my country."

9/15/2015 12:53:45 PM

bbehe
Burn it all down.
18402 Posts
user info
edit post

The people are frustrated!

9/16/2015 7:53:03 AM

moron
All American
34078 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/09/16/donald-trump-likes-that-proverbs-verse-that-might-not-exist/

I don't fault Trump for not being religious, but he can't answer a question correctly even with several days lead time.

Seems like he's used to having handlers take care of details for him, and he has lost the ability to think in a detail-oriented manner.

9/16/2015 11:33:44 AM

HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/16/middleeast/iran-nuclear-deal-republican-debate/index.html

Can some please explain all the Iranian treaty bashing and chest bumping directed to Iran from Republican candidates regarding the issue.

From what I understand the treaty:

- Forces Iran to shut down centrifuges and other programs that could be used for enriching Uranium. Enforcement
of this will be VERIFIED not assumed.
- Reduces Iranian stockpiles.
- Requires modification of the Arak facility to minimize plutonium
- Mandates international inspection of Iran nuclear facilities
- Sets up mechanism to re-instate sanctions if Iran fails to comply with treaty.

Essentially this treating isn't giving Iran something they did not already have or were working on developing (i.e. Uranium and enrichment uranium).
Eliminates current E.U. and U.S sanctions (since we all know how good sanctions worked for creating a regime change after 50 years of Cuban embargo).

So what is all this doomsday and bitching from republicans about? Are they mad that someone with a -D next to their name presided over the deal or is there some naïve thinking that by continuing sanctions Iran's people will spontaneously erupt into revolution and overthrow the government we don't like?

I don't see what any other alternative to this treaty is besides fueling up the jets and tanks to invade Iran. The status quo gives Iran no disincentive to continue their enrichment activities.



[Edited on September 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM. Reason : a]

9/16/2015 5:45:29 PM

JT3bucky
All American
23249 Posts
user info
edit post

Graham is the worst damn candidate possible. It's like watching your old crippled senile Grandmother speak.

YEEEESH

9/16/2015 6:34:12 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

^^im all for the deal but to play devils advocate, the deal only lasts 15 years and isnt a comprehensive end to their nuclear program. I dont really care but it allows them to build up funds and defenses to be prepared to break out and build an unstoppable program much more quickly.

The alternative would be a more one sided deal where their program is dismantled completely and inspections are much more intrusive on Iran

9/16/2015 6:45:17 PM

marko
Tom Joad
72825 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't think I'm going to make it through the introductions.

9/16/2015 8:18:56 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
39221 Posts
user info
edit post

amazing

performance art is the greatest

9/16/2015 8:27:05 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

Trump kick8ng ass the same way

9/16/2015 8:36:19 PM

bbehe
Burn it all down.
18402 Posts
user info
edit post

the moderators have lost all control

9/16/2015 8:52:30 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
39221 Posts
user info
edit post

it'd be great if one of the moderators called them out on their complete bullshit regarding Planned Parenthood

9/16/2015 9:04:57 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148329 Posts
user info
edit post

sounds like Trump and Carson are already looking towards being running mates

9/16/2015 9:16:32 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

Ben said we should let them be sharecroppers

9/16/2015 9:25:11 PM

wahoowa
All American
3288 Posts
user info
edit post

The GOP will not exist in 20 years. What a bunch of idiots.

9/16/2015 9:33:19 PM

Shrike
All American
9594 Posts
user info
edit post

Thank god one of these strong Republicans will finally capture or kill bin Laden.

Ohhh.....

9/16/2015 10:16:07 PM

NeuseRvrRat
hello Mr. NSA!
35376 Posts
user info
edit post

fuckin clownshoes

9/16/2015 10:43:59 PM

moron
All American
34078 Posts
user info
edit post

Did Ted Cruz just say "as a Cuban..."?

9/16/2015 11:13:42 PM

The E Man
Suspended
15268 Posts
user info
edit post

1. Ben carson calls for agricultural peonage for illegal immigrants

2. The death to america lie in regards to iran

3. W kept us safe

4. Eliminate income taxes and only tax purchases

5. Jeb bush smoked better weed

6. Weed is worse than alcahol

7. Isis iran and nk will be in the us any minute

8. 20k troops in syria and iraq

9. Ronald Reagan won the debate

10. Jake tapper cherry picked questions to candidates who are known for that issue turning the debate into a repeat of the few things weve heard for years

9/16/2015 11:44:09 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148329 Posts
user info
edit post

Bush lied, people died NyM stood by, Earl thrived

9/16/2015 11:46:08 PM

HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

^ My favorite bumper sticker here in Oregon is "When Bill lied nobody died" with a picture of slick willy winking. Lol

9/17/2015 12:54:24 AM

synapse
play so hard
60935 Posts
user info
edit post

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/08/07/3689230/chris-christie-september-10/

Can't believe this dude keeps repeating this lie.

I mean I'll give it to him, it's a helluva line, but it's also a big fat lie.

9/17/2015 3:21:05 AM

dmspack
oh we back
25462 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Did Ted Cruz just say "as a Cuban..."?"


yeah I'm pretty sure he said "If I were Cuban..." or something like that. wtf...that was weird.

9/17/2015 7:46:02 AM

mofopaack
Veteran
434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Can some please explain all the Iranian treaty bashing and chest bumping directed to Iran from Republican candidates regarding the issue.

From what I understand the treaty:

- Forces Iran to shut down centrifuges and other programs that could be used for enriching Uranium. Enforcement
of this will be VERIFIED not assumed.
- Reduces Iranian stockpiles.
- Requires modification of the Arak facility to minimize plutonium
- Mandates international inspection of Iran nuclear facilities
- Sets up mechanism to re-instate sanctions if Iran fails to comply with treaty.

Essentially this treating isn't giving Iran something they did not already have or were working on developing (i.e. Uranium and enrichment uranium).
Eliminates current E.U. and U.S sanctions (since we all know how good sanctions worked for creating a regime change after 50 years of Cuban embargo).

So what is all this doomsday and bitching from republicans about? Are they mad that someone with a -D next to their name presided over the deal or is there some naïve thinking that by continuing sanctions Iran's people will spontaneously erupt into revolution and overthrow the government we don't like?

I don't see what any other alternative to this treaty is besides fueling up the jets and tanks to invade Iran. The status quo gives Iran no disincentive to continue their enrichment activities."


Ill bite. Admittedly, Im not a fan of the deal. I think we gained too little in return for what Iran has gained. The sanctions were crippling the economy, and removing the sanctions gives Iran something in the neighborhood of US economy equivalent of $4Trillion. Thats roughly 1/4 of our outstanding debt. That type of capital inflow is huge for Iran, who has been proven to sponsor terrorist groups.

The US on the other hand, couldnt even negotiate getting 4 hostages out. But the core issue for me is that too much of this deal is based on trusting Iran, who has never honored a deal in their existence. They have ample time to hide any wrongdoings that IMO hinders the international community from having proper oversight.

9/17/2015 10:33:36 AM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » 2016 Republican primary thread Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 33, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.