for page 92

Quote :

"Someone should post this on the story idea forum on The Daily Show with John Stewart website http://forums.thedailyshow.com/?page=ForumView&forum_id=21"

4/22/2011 11:13:03 AM

--Didn't make castings of the footprints at the body site.
--Didn't make castings of the tire tracks at the body site when the size didn't match the Cooper vehicles.
--Didn't test the cigarette butt found within feet of the body for DNA until 2 years later.
--Walked around inside the home without booties.
--Left the computer running for 27 hours while connected to the internet, resulting in 690+ files modified after it's in police custody. The only incriminating evidence on that computer has 100% invalid timestamps.

[Edited on April 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM. Reason : ]

4/22/2011 11:15:45 AM

as far as I can tell, didn't investigate the 9 dudes that she was fuckin, or their wives. Didn't investigate the dude she was bwning in FL that wanted to give her a green card.

4/22/2011 12:40:09 PM

I took a few minutes and skimmed over a few pages of the thread on websleuths' site about yesterday. Seems like most people over there don't believe the eye witnesses, think the incident with the Navy guy the night before Nancy went missing was just a ding-dong-ditch, and that they wouldn't expect police to follow up on every lead/tip because they probably got so many and since Brad and Nancy were going through a divorce then it most certainly was him.

If anyone in my family ever goes missing or is killed and I found out police didn't follow up on every last tip, then I am definitely going to jail because heads are gonna roll

4/22/2011 12:42:46 PM

My guess would be if they had so many leads that they couldn't check up on them all they would not of had to set up roadblocks asking random drivers about her disappearance for days afterwards.

4/22/2011 12:58:59 PM

I guess they didn't have time to check the blackberry either, since it was locked in the desk drawer while they were out searching the golf course on the tip of a psychic.

4/22/2011 1:24:51 PM

"Hello citizen. Have you seen this woman? Bear in mind we will disregard everything you s...What's that? You're psychic? YOU ARE THE NEW LEAD DETECTIVE."

4/22/2011 2:20:01 PM

Hey kids, be safe. Don't get killed in Cary.. they won't find you.

4/22/2011 2:43:26 PM

More like, "Hey criminals. Go to Cary. They'll never find you."

4/22/2011 2:46:46 PM

If you get butt napped, make them drive you into raleigh first. Suggest a nice park or some shit. As a victim, youd have better luck getting justice.

4/22/2011 2:50:21 PM

I cannot wait to hear about this from the jury's perspective after it is all over.

4/22/2011 3:46:06 PM

i found out who the psychic was

4/22/2011 7:28:08 PM

btt for Monday

4/25/2011 7:52:05 AM

Quote :

"I cannot wait to hear about this from the jury's perspective after it is all over."

This.

I can't explain why, but I have been fascinated with this from the start.

4/25/2011 8:23:47 AM

Based on what the attorneys were arguing about on Thursday, today could be an interesting day! We might get to hear about how the blackberry actually got deleted!

[Edited on April 25, 2011 at 8:37 AM. Reason : day]

4/25/2011 8:37:05 AM

what time does this start up?

4/25/2011 8:46:57 AM

9:30am

4/25/2011 8:48:30 AM

k

4/25/2011 8:50:17 AM

A charlatan psychic is working with the Cary police. This is the problem with our society.

I think I know what needs to be done...... I need to start claiming I'm a psychic because there's obviously a lot of money in this and the cary police department is clearly run by fucking morons.

4/25/2011 8:54:59 AM

Is it bad that I was actually looking forward to a Monday so that I could continue watching this again?

4/25/2011 8:55:05 AM

no because this is all I was thinking about on my drive to work

4/25/2011 9:16:27 AM

ok just got on...what are they talking about?

4/25/2011 9:41:54 AM

State is throwing a hissy fit because the defense found another expert to testify to what the court would not let the previous expert testify about.

4/25/2011 9:43:04 AM

ah...a computer forensic expert since Jay Ward could not testify as such

4/25/2011 9:43:54 AM

commentary please....I cant stream right now

4/25/2011 9:47:18 AM

in other words, prosecution is about to get pwned by the defense, prosecution objects to it, and judge blindly says "I"LL ALLOW IT".

4/25/2011 9:47:50 AM

State is throwing a hissy fit because the defense found another expert to testify to what the court would not let the previous expert testify about.

4/25/2011 9:48:03 AM

did the judge rule yet, i stepped away

4/25/2011 9:51:48 AM

Quote :

"ILL ALLOW IT"

4/25/2011 9:51:58 AM

I guess they're running scared because it will reveal the truth? Meaning the prosecutors are really concerned that they might not put Brad away regardless of whether he did it.

4/25/2011 9:53:27 AM

^^^nope, he is reading the report in question right now.

Not sure why the content of the report is relevant for the ruling he is going to make.

[Edited on April 25, 2011 at 9:54 AM. Reason : d]

4/25/2011 9:53:38 AM

judge is reading the report now...hasn't made a ruling yet

4/25/2011 9:53:53 AM

Dick Boz is speaking now

[Edited on April 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM. Reason : oh snap Dr.Havok posted on websleuth]

4/25/2011 9:56:09 AM

oh shit. bringing up websleuths.

4/25/2011 9:57:52 AM

Seems foolish to be posting on websleuths if you're a witness.

4/25/2011 9:59:24 AM

link?

4/25/2011 9:59:30 AM

Quote :

"Seems foolish to be posting on websleuthsTWW about the case if you're a witness."

4/25/2011 10:02:31 AM

Nice quote from websleuths:

Quote :

"FWIW and IMHO, I believe this def is trying to do the same thing the OJ def did, confuse the jurors with too much info."

Oh the irony.

4/25/2011 10:03:14 AM

ScubaS - I just searched where I read it last week on WS, and it has been removed...I didnt screen-cap it my bad

4/25/2011 10:03:23 AM

who is the genius who decided that this prosecutor would be likable to a jury?

4/25/2011 10:07:06 AM

Ahaha. "They haven't had adequate time to look for his facebook page."

4/25/2011 10:10:13 AM

adequate time to look through facebook

ahaha damn

4/25/2011 10:10:15 AM

Not sure why they didn't bring in this new witness in before, but it would be bogus if they didn't allow it. I also don't know why an option wouldn't be to allow the witness but give the state X number of days to prepare.

4/25/2011 10:13:52 AM

Defense just summed up the trial. No physical evidence. The google map search is the only thing they've got and the defense is being blocked from defending in the most significant issue in the case.

4/25/2011 10:14:32 AM

they call him in before because they didn't know or think they would need him

4/25/2011 10:14:37 AM

They didn't bring the new witness before because they just got him on Wednesday. When JW wasn't allowed to testify. They gave the DA's notice that same day.

4/25/2011 10:14:55 AM

I get that. I'm just saying, why wouldn't you have someone with airtight credentials in the first place.

4/25/2011 10:15:42 AM

Did the prosecution actually say that about Facebook? I had to get up from my desk.

4/25/2011 10:16:14 AM

because the thinking was that his credentials would be sufficient for what he was testifying to, and they should have been but the judge does not understand what network security is and the defense didn't do a good job explaining it

4/25/2011 10:16:48 AM

Quote :

"who is the genius who decided that this prosecutor would be likable to a jury?"

haha, just googled the guy and apparently Boz is a '07 grad of UNC Law.

4/25/2011 10:17:32 AM