User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » java protected transient? Page [1]  
rynop
All American
829 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm new to java - what does protected transient mean? I'm having trouble finding documentation on it.

public class TheBean extends Container
{
private transient OfficeConnection mConnection;
...

11/3/2005 4:30:50 PM

xienze
All American
7341 Posts
user info
edit post

Err, did you mean private or what?

Protected access in Java means the field or method is accessible to the class, its subclasses, and all the other classes in the same package. The transient keyword indicates that the field isn't part of the data saved when the class is serialized.

11/3/2005 8:03:09 PM

dFshadow
All American
9507 Posts
user info
edit post

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/io/providing.html
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/transient.html

11/4/2005 12:02:18 AM

madmoose
Starting Lineup
68 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Protected access in Java means the field or method is accessible to the class, its subclasses, and all the other classes in the same package."


If you don't specify public, private, or protected, the class/field is only accessible from within the same package.

transient means the field won't get serialized if you are doing any serialization of your classes.

[Edited on November 4, 2005 at 5:02 PM. Reason : messed up quote.. I suck at life.]

11/4/2005 5:02:15 PM

xienze
All American
7341 Posts
user info
edit post

Sorry, you're wrong. Protected access is also accessible to all classes in the same package. I'll leave the proof as an exercise to the reader.

11/4/2005 6:31:36 PM

psnarula
All American
1540 Posts
user info
edit post

okay i've wondered about this for a long time: what is Serializable and when do we want a class to implement this interface?

11/4/2005 7:32:48 PM

scud
All American
10804 Posts
user info
edit post

Serialize is another way to say 'marshall'.

Basically you write out the Class instance member data into a form that can be persisted and/or transmitted. Obviously since this persistance is heirarchical (if you have other class members) they need to be Serializable as well.

11/4/2005 7:44:33 PM

psnarula
All American
1540 Posts
user info
edit post

sorry i don't follow. i dont know what marshall means either...

11/4/2005 8:02:15 PM

scud
All American
10804 Posts
user info
edit post

okay...one very primitive example of serialization would be to 'marshall' a class out into XML

Say you have a Java class called Dog


public class Dog
{
private String _breed = "Golden Retriever";
private String _color = "Blonde";
private int _height = 22;
private int _weight = 105;
private String _name = "";
private transient boolean initialized = false;

public Dog(String name)
{
//All our dogs look the same
_name = name;
initialized = true;
}
}

Dog bogey = new Dog("Bogey");


If i serialize the object bogey into XML, it could look something like :

<Dog>
<Breed value="Golden Retriever" type="String" />
<Name value="Bogey" type="String" />
<Color value="Blonde" type="String" />
<Height value=22 type="int" />
<Weight value=105 type="int" />
</Dog>


This is a pretty simplistic example but it should convey the point. Now another process or thread can read the serialized string and reconstruct or 'unmarshall' the object into a new copy. Notice that 'initialized' isn't serialized into the XML because it was marked 'transient' . We're saying we don't care to perisist that member usually because it's irrelevant and saves space, code and or bandwidth. In this case it's obvious we don't need the initialized member since it doesn't make sense to serialize an uninitialized object.

11/4/2005 8:33:43 PM

psnarula
All American
1540 Posts
user info
edit post

thanks. makes more sense now.

11/4/2005 9:01:56 PM

madmoose
Starting Lineup
68 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Sorry, you're wrong. Protected access is also accessible to all classes in the same package. I'll leave the proof as an exercise to the reader."


I stand corrected. Though I can't recall seeing a Class that ever used the protected keyword when it wasn't intended to be subclassed. Besides, they aren't really only accessible from the same package since you can subclass and gain access to fields/methods from a seperate package. Just seems like a bad practice imho.

11/4/2005 11:10:16 PM

xienze
All American
7341 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Just seems like a bad practice imho."


It has to do with the philosophy behind Java's access modifiers. From most restrictive to least restrictive are private, (default), protected, and public. For protected not to allow access to other classes in the same package would make protected more restrictive than (default).

11/5/2005 10:34:20 AM

rynop
All American
829 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^^thanks scud. That example helped alot.

11/6/2005 3:54:57 PM

boonedocks
All American
5550 Posts
user info
edit post

As someone who knows nothing about CS, this thread's title made me chuckle.

11/6/2005 4:42:03 PM

philihp
All American
8349 Posts
user info
edit post

think of serializing as like "freeze drying" a java object.

you usually don't need to worry about transient member variables, since you usually aren't making classes that implement Serializable (although you might occationally extend a class that implements it... like Swing classes for example).

11/6/2005 8:34:24 PM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » java protected transient? Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.