User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » FSU might have lost, but were validated Page [1]  
Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

for being chosen to go to the orange bowl.


seriously, they fucking almost beat the #3 team in the nation.

1/4/2006 1:13:07 AM

BigHitSunday
Dick Danger
51059 Posts
user info
edit post

that game will be talked about decades down the road

1/4/2006 1:14:45 AM

socrates
Suspended
1964 Posts
user info
edit post

and they almost did it ncstate style. a million bonehead penalties and missed fgs (no deraney)

1/4/2006 1:14:45 AM

Crede
All American
7339 Posts
user info
edit post

Somewhat true, but the game validates even more that both teams suck at kicking.

1/4/2006 1:15:27 AM

BigHitSunday
Dick Danger
51059 Posts
user info
edit post

i fucking hate kickers now though

im tired of their bullshit

1/4/2006 1:18:20 AM

socrates
Suspended
1964 Posts
user info
edit post

doubtle post

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 1:19 AM. Reason : damn the acc only won 1 million + bowl]

1/4/2006 1:19:00 AM

sensi
All American
768 Posts
user info
edit post

11 penalties / 115 yds, not to mention those declined.

1/4/2006 1:19:36 AM

KeB
All American
9828 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"i fucking hate kickers now though

im tired of their bullshit

"


like you could hit a FG against either FSU or PSU

1/4/2006 1:27:41 AM

Fuel
All American
7016 Posts
user info
edit post

I think I could.

I've hit tougher kicks than those guys, in pressure situations too.

Then again, a rugby ball is easier to kick than a football

1/4/2006 1:30:34 AM

BigHitSunday
Dick Danger
51059 Posts
user info
edit post

^^thats not even an argument

what are the dynamics of what you are trying to say?

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 1:32 AM. Reason : c]

1/4/2006 1:31:51 AM

CaptainBF
Terminated
2633 Posts
user info
edit post

That was the best football game I have seen for a long time

1/4/2006 1:35:49 AM

BIGswoll187
All American
3729 Posts
user info
edit post

that was a great ass game

1/4/2006 1:37:31 AM

NCSUMEB
All American
2530 Posts
user info
edit post

I can't help but draw the irrelevant comparison between pro and NCAA kickers. Inside 40 yards in the pros, it's usually a lock (esp. in the middle of the field), in college, outside of the top 3 kickers nationally, it's a roller coaster. If you watch 3 college football games, you'll likely see a PAT shanked. How many times has a PAT been missed in the pros all season (blocks aside)? Totally irrelevant I know, but kickers are kickers, they don't change much physically, and a lot have soccer backgrounds, so how can college kickers be so much more inconsistent?

1/4/2006 1:39:22 AM

Dammit100
All American
17605 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"almost "

1/4/2006 1:39:38 AM

jimb0
All American
4667 Posts
user info
edit post

one of the most frustrating but awesome games ever.

1/4/2006 1:40:43 AM

pbomb
All American
660 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ because pro kickers are the best of those kickers, not every college kicker goes pro

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 1:42 AM. Reason : .]

1/4/2006 1:41:58 AM

ballinlb
All American
1412 Posts
user info
edit post

i think the pro kickers hit them bc they can handle pressure, i think the pressure gets to a lot of college kickers

1/4/2006 4:41:01 AM

Saddamizer
Suspended
5294 Posts
user info
edit post

Kicker is the one position where nerves have just as much if not more to do with your level of success than your actual talent or skill level. Lots of guys can kick a 50 yarder...not a lot of guys can do it down by two in front of 75,000 with 3 seconds left in the game.

1/4/2006 4:59:45 AM

jbtilley
All American
12797 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"and they almost did it ncstate style."


They even kept throwing screen passes.

1/4/2006 8:42:17 AM

BDubLS1
All American
10406 Posts
user info
edit post

good game

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 8:51 AM. Reason : yep]

1/4/2006 8:50:17 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

especially since VT almost lost to the Lou

1/4/2006 9:17:31 AM

torch
Veteran
189 Posts
user info
edit post

I knew Penn State couldn't cover a 10 point spread.

1/4/2006 9:19:14 AM

gunzz
IS NÚMERO UNO
68205 Posts
user info
edit post

that was a great game
the punt return was just nasty

im so glad that FSU showed up, unlike The U

1/4/2006 9:29:41 AM

BigPapa
All American
4727 Posts
user info
edit post

The hash marks are closer in the NFL thus making the FG kicking window smaller.

1/4/2006 10:56:09 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

really?

i never knew that

1/4/2006 11:04:57 AM

CaptainBF
Terminated
2633 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Totally irrelevant I know, but kickers are kickers, they don't change much physically, and a lot have soccer backgrounds, so how can college kickers be so much more inconsistent?"

College kickers get 4 years. Pro kickers can stay in the league for a long time. Look at the good kickers in the NFL: Vinatieri - 10 years, Kasay - 15 years, Longwell - 9 years, Vanderjagt - 8 years. That is a lot more time to develop.

Also note that teams won't draft or sign multiple kickers, so depth is really shallow there. NFL kickers are the best of the best college kickers, and the lifespan of one is so long that the league becomes incredibly stacked at that position.

1/4/2006 11:11:02 AM

abonorio
All American
9344 Posts
user info
edit post

Also keep in mind that the tick marks in the pros are closer to the center of the field. So extreme left and right kicks in the ncaa's are harder.

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 11:54 AM. Reason : and that was already said]

1/4/2006 11:53:38 AM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

vinaterri has been in the league 10 years?

i thought he was like brady, and hadn't done much before the "Dynasty" started

1/4/2006 12:48:00 PM

DaveOT
All American
11945 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1392

He's been kicking for the Pats since '96, with a pretty consistent record.

1/4/2006 12:53:12 PM

Panthro
All American
7333 Posts
user info
edit post

makes me wish i hadnt gone to bed @ 10pm to make love to my wife.

1/4/2006 1:26:40 PM

packboozie
All American
17452 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"for being chosen to go to the orange bowl."


Well this thread is really pointless. They were in the Orange Bowl because they were ACC champs. Not because they were "chosen".

1/4/2006 1:39:24 PM

1CYPHER
Suspended
1513 Posts
user info
edit post

That doesn't make this thread pointless you moron.

1/4/2006 2:04:35 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
37693 Posts
user info
edit post

it does have a point. if a conferences bcs representative doesnt finsish in the top 10 of the bcs standings for 3 yrs in a row they could lose their automatic berth.

fsu didnt finish in the top 10, if it happens twice more, this game can be used as evidence that they deserved to be there.

1/4/2006 2:07:42 PM

packboozie
All American
17452 Posts
user info
edit post

Then what is the point of the thread? Proving that FSU belongs in a BCS bowl...which it automatically got because they won the ACC...they were not chosen.

So the point of this thread is saying FSU deserved to be there? NO FUCKING SHIT. They won their division and beat Virginia Tech to get in. They EARNED their way in unlike Notre Dame.

1/4/2006 2:10:17 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
37693 Posts
user info
edit post

nd earned there way in as well, as far as the rules go which is all you are referring to.


his pt is that the bcs is intended for the top 8 teams in the nation and before the game many thought fsu did not belong in that group.

1/4/2006 2:12:02 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah no fucking shit they got into the bowl because they beat Va Tech in the acc championship. the point of the thread was that people thought they made it in by a lucky break, but in fact, they really had the talent to compete in this bowl, and they proved it last night.

1/4/2006 5:11:40 PM

pttyndal
WINGS!!!!!
35217 Posts
user info
edit post

FSU is highly underated at #22. They just had a few problems to work out and they did but I think they are clearly a top 10 team. They were one extra point away and the game may not have even gone to overtime. But if if's and but's were candy and nuts, we'd have a merry christmas everyday.

1/4/2006 5:12:11 PM

hondaguy
All American
6409 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"really?

i never knew that"


BOA Stadium for the Car care bowl. Notice the slightly faded marks closer to the center of the field.

1/4/2006 5:42:25 PM

phishnlou
All American
13446 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"that game will be talked about decades down the road"


that game wont be talked about tommorow, let alone decades down the road

1/4/2006 6:24:33 PM

pbomb
All American
660 Posts
user info
edit post

i beg to differ, that game was the most exciting bcs game I have seen thus far this year except for maybe the end of the wvu vs. georgia game. It will be talked about. All of those missed kicks at the end were crazy.

1/4/2006 6:41:13 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
50085 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"FSU is highly underated at #22. They just had a few problems to work out and they did but I think they are clearly a top 10 team."


Um, no. They CLEARLY are NOT a Top 10 team. They have 5 losses. They lost to us. They have the same record as us.

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 7:04 PM. Reason : f]

1/4/2006 7:04:27 PM

StingrayRush
All American
14628 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"i beg to differ, that game was the most exciting bcs game I have seen thus far this year"


um, i agree with the game being talked about, but that statement isn't saying a whole lot

1/4/2006 7:09:18 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
50085 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't even agree with that. The UGa-WVU game was far more exciting. Less mistakes, penalties, just as good a finish. It just wasn't as long...

V I mean it was a good game but WVU was supposed bigger underdogs then FSU was I believe. Oh well.. at least they were both good games.. really all 3 have been pretty good so far.

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 7:16 PM. Reason : f]

1/4/2006 7:12:05 PM

statefan24
All American
9157 Posts
user info
edit post

while the other two BCS games so far were pretty hyped up to be exciting, this game was more exciting than both IMO. people like jay marriotti said PSU would stomp FSU and they were sadly mistaken, which was the best part of the whole thing.

[Edited on January 4, 2006 at 7:15 PM. Reason : .]

1/4/2006 7:15:03 PM

Crede
All American
7339 Posts
user info
edit post

Jay Mariotti is and always will be an idiot.

1/4/2006 9:52:33 PM

phishnlou
All American
13446 Posts
user info
edit post

i wonder why the white sox fan doesnt like mariotti

1/4/2006 9:53:21 PM

 Message Boards » Sports Talk » FSU might have lost, but were validated Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.