User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » bets on when the next world war will occur Page [1] 2, Next  
JayMCnasty
All American
14180 Posts
user info
edit post

im goin with 2009

1/12/2006 2:03:08 PM

poopface
All American
29367 Posts
user info
edit post

The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, *and* Colonel Sanders before he went heads up.

1/12/2006 2:04:54 PM

ssjamind
All American
30098 Posts
user info
edit post

just like the last 2 world wars...started by right wing neanderthals

and the so called "left", civilised folks come in and have to clean up

1/12/2006 2:05:30 PM

spöokyjon

18617 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm going with whenever Israel nukes another country.

Nobody will give a shit about India v. Pakistan because they're just not white enough.

1/12/2006 2:10:25 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

From Albert Pike's letter to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871--describing the plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order--based on a vision Pike received:

Quote :
""The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
"


oh, the question was when

who knows...but I'm betting soon

1/12/2006 2:28:11 PM

LoneSnark
All American
12317 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"just like the last 2 world wars...started by right wing neanderthals"

I thought Germany started the first world war because they felt the liberal social order was preventing them from creating a socialist paradise?

1/12/2006 2:28:57 PM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."


I don't buy it. You're telling us that Albert Pike could name the political movements that would fight during the second world war as far back as 1871. Are we to believe this simply because you provided a website with no citations?

1/12/2006 2:35:07 PM

MathFreak
All American
14478 Posts
user info
edit post

Never.

Large portion of militarily powerful nations have nukes, and lotsa other countries are on their way to getting them. The only country who could theoretically start such a war in the near future is the United States, but their population is mostly "damn right, we're going to war.. pass me another burger" warriors, and it's a democracy so that matters and the population would not approve any war with significant casualties.

1/12/2006 2:36:18 PM

Shaggy
All American
17820 Posts
user info
edit post

MOON WARS BETWEEN THE MOON COLONIES!

1/12/2006 3:21:52 PM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"and it's a democracy so that matters and the population would not approve any war with significant casualties."
this isn't a democracy

i wasn't given a vote on whether to go to iraq

why would i be given a vot on whether to start wwIII?

1/12/2006 3:37:37 PM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Senator Woodfoot?

1/12/2006 3:39:07 PM

TaterSalad
All American
6256 Posts
user info
edit post

2010 sounds like a fun year

1/12/2006 3:42:37 PM

MathFreak
All American
14478 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ Well, a democracy doesn't mean everybody decides on everything. Maybe in some purist sense but not in any remotely real situation. Heavy casualties will make the population upset, and unhappy Americans isn't good for politicians. Ask Jimmy Carter.

1/12/2006 3:43:21 PM

abonorio
All American
9344 Posts
user info
edit post

THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW

Quote :
"I thought Germany started the first world war because they felt the liberal social order was preventing them from creating a socialist paradise?"


DING DING DING DING

[Edited on January 12, 2006 at 3:48 PM. Reason : .]

1/12/2006 3:46:01 PM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"unhappy Americans isn't good for politicians"
true

but you know what is good for politicians

gerrymandering

1/12/2006 3:50:59 PM

nastoute
All American
31058 Posts
user info
edit post

1/13/2006 12:01:28 AM

Prawn Star
All American
7643 Posts
user info
edit post

^Who gives a shit about Taiwan, except for those Chinamen?

Nothin for the world to get involved in.

Unless China gets greedy and tries to take over the rest of the continent.

1/13/2006 12:04:58 AM

nastoute
All American
31058 Posts
user info
edit post

umm

the chinese do

and we do

and, i think the taiwanese do

1/13/2006 12:05:50 AM

ssjamind
All American
30098 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" thought Germany started the first world war because they felt the liberal social order was preventing them from creating a socialist paradise?"



Thats one way to look at it. Another way to look at is that the 'merchants of death' and German expansionists wanted to go to war.

1/13/2006 12:11:11 AM

Prawn Star
All American
7643 Posts
user info
edit post

You think we would fight the Chinese over Taiwan?

That would be pretty stupid.

1/13/2006 12:11:14 AM

ssjamind
All American
30098 Posts
user info
edit post

i think after a a whole lot of sabre rattling, Taiwan will be untied with China peacefully

1/13/2006 12:11:45 AM

Gamecat
All American
17913 Posts
user info
edit post

As soon as someone manages to convince a few people he's the son of god.

1/13/2006 12:43:58 AM

RedGuard
All American
5596 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"You think we would fight the Chinese over Taiwan?"


It's not as stupid as you may think. If push comes to shove, there's a chance we may step in. That being said, I don't think either the Chinese or the United States will let it get to that point; both nations simply have too much to lose.

1/13/2006 2:15:46 AM

skokiaan
All American
26447 Posts
user info
edit post

they will not be able to penetrate our impenetrable umbrella of space lasers

1/13/2006 2:27:51 AM

Gamecat
All American
17913 Posts
user info
edit post

Don't you mean "the people of Earth" would have too much to lose?

1/13/2006 6:09:41 AM

timswar
All American
41050 Posts
user info
edit post

10 years ago we would have destroyed China over Taiwan...
now, we've got too much invested economically in China, they're our "buddy" now, if they went for Taiwan, i'm not sure that we'd bother to intervene...

1/13/2006 9:00:09 AM

ddlakhan
All American
990 Posts
user info
edit post

the point still is why would they want formosa? i mean shit they dont need it to do well.... they have enough shit to contend with, let alone conquering a populace that will no doubt just create more unrest and probably encite some sort of guerella sp? warfare. its probably not worth it to them, unless there economy goes in the gutter....

1/13/2006 9:32:04 AM

Mindstorm
All American
15858 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"You think we would fight the Chinese over Taiwan?

That would be pretty stupid."


We sell Taiwan arms, and they're another western-like asian nation that we have in the region as a pretty good friend (if not pretty much an ally). We wouldn't want to lose that, plus it would be great PR for our nation to defend the tiny nation of taiwan against the big bad nation of China who is run by people who hate freedom.

We've also got an economic incentive to prevent war (or stop the war) between both sides. Things are made for us in China and Taiwan, and we have interests in both (E.G. the semiconductor facilities in Taiwan, and all that fun cheap shit we get from china that keeps us able to afford our lifestyles).

We might not go in to invade China in a retaliatory move, but we might just blow up everything they have that tries to cross the waters into Taiwan (and tell them to sign a peace treaty).

1/13/2006 9:39:22 AM

billyboy
All American
3174 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"this isn't a democracy

i wasn't given a vote on whether to go to iraq

why would i be given a vot on whether to start wwIII?
"


They forgot to send out the invitations on the vote. It was a surprise party.

My prediction: April 12, 2007

1/13/2006 10:00:05 AM

ssjamind
All American
30098 Posts
user info
edit post

i would like to reiterate my guidance

Quote :
"i think after a a whole lot of sabre rattling, Taiwan will be untied with China peacefully"

1/13/2006 10:04:43 AM

JayMCnasty
All American
14180 Posts
user info
edit post

everyone will eventually get fed up with everyone else and want to kill them. its human nature, and only a matter of time.

1/13/2006 10:59:50 AM

Golovko
All American
27023 Posts
user info
edit post

2006

1/13/2006 11:25:48 AM

radu
All American
1240 Posts
user info
edit post

in fact, i think Taiwan will be tongue-tied with China peacefully.

1/13/2006 11:36:05 PM

PvtJoker
All American
15000 Posts
user info
edit post

06/06/06

!!!

1/14/2006 12:37:35 AM

Jere
Suspended
4838 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"this isn't a democracy"

Quote :
"this isn't a democracy"

Quote :
"this isn't a democracy"

1/14/2006 9:32:30 AM

ParksNrec
All American
8741 Posts
user info
edit post

4:00am EST, September 29th, 2024.

[Edited on January 14, 2006 at 9:40 AM. Reason : ]

1/14/2006 9:40:02 AM

mrfrog

15145 Posts
user info
edit post

2012

I think that's about when people will be seriously feeling peak oil, i mean peak oil fucking everything up. So we'll have a democrat president in 2008, he'll make a whole bunch of mistakes and people will start wanting another tyrant like Bush in office in 2012, and similar to the civil war, when that dude walks into office we'll be at war.

1/14/2006 10:53:32 AM

marko
Tom Joad
72767 Posts
user info
edit post

2010 WATCH IT GO TO FIRE

1/14/2006 10:56:49 AM

spöokyjon

18617 Posts
user info
edit post

Plus, 2013 is the year the world is gonna end.

1/14/2006 11:00:58 AM

PinkandBlack
Suspended
10517 Posts
user info
edit post


1/14/2006 12:34:23 PM

UnWorldly
Veteran
107 Posts
user info
edit post

I think within 10 years, and it will get sparked in the middle east

1/15/2006 5:19:01 PM

mrfrog

15145 Posts
user info
edit post

oil wars.

1/15/2006 6:15:39 PM

AxlBonBach
All American
45549 Posts
user info
edit post

February 14, 2024



Valentines Day... bummer.

1/15/2006 6:53:15 PM

quiet guy
Suspended
3020 Posts
user info
edit post

Aug. 29, 1997

1/15/2006 7:49:40 PM

E30turbo
Suspended
1520 Posts
user info
edit post

oil words, interesting.




i want to see text books in 100 years and how it refers to the upcoming loss of life as "The Oil War"





i love hindsight. But then again, if we win it wont be "the oil wars" as much as it will be the "Democracy spreading time of peace"

1/15/2006 10:52:30 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"February 14, 2024



Valentines Day... bummer."

1/16/2006 2:32:48 AM

socrates
Suspended
1964 Posts
user info
edit post

9/11/01

1/16/2006 3:35:55 AM

hamisnice
Veteran
408 Posts
user info
edit post

There will not be an oil war. Period.

If what we are fighting now is an oil war, we are doing a horrible job at it and the conservatives will realize that they don't know how to fight a war for oil. They won't be able to raise the support to go.

We experienced "peak oil" last year during Katrina. People started to cut back and traded in their SUVs. We will be okay.

1/16/2006 8:11:11 AM

mrfrog

15145 Posts
user info
edit post

WORLD HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY
chapter 2: Rise and Fall of the American Empire (2012-2020)
...

1/16/2006 9:16:35 AM

SandSanta
All American
22435 Posts
user info
edit post

The Rise and Fall in 2012-2020? What?

War is no longer profitable. There won't be a major world war.

Just a bunch of small fights and everyone losing more freedom.

1/16/2006 11:25:21 AM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » bets on when the next world war will occur Page [1] 2, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.