CharlieEFH All American 21806 Posts user info edit post |
that's not really a foul is it?
everyone just thinks it is?
so when the refs don't call this imaginary foul, people get mad because they believe in a rule that isn't a rule?
that's how it works right? 2/22/2006 11:43:35 PM |
winn123 All American 1160 Posts user info edit post |
is this serious? 2/22/2006 11:44:03 PM |
TaterSalad All American 6256 Posts user info edit post |
basketology 101 2/22/2006 11:44:07 PM |
HaLo All American 14263 Posts user info edit post |
just ignore CharlieEFH, he's shown his sporting rule ignorance many times 2/22/2006 11:46:31 PM |
CharlieEFH All American 21806 Posts user info edit post |
2/22/2006 11:46:57 PM |
RowdyRebel7 All American 817 Posts user info edit post |
"who's JJ Redick?"
-serious question from a MALE friend of mine 2/22/2006 11:48:17 PM |
Probasesteal All American 10307 Posts user info edit post |
male sex partner 2/22/2006 11:50:07 PM |
CharlieEFH All American 21806 Posts user info edit post |
if it's a rule then it shoulda been called tonight
unless i don't know what the fuck it is
in which case...see Halo's post 2/22/2006 11:56:22 PM |
Lowjack All American 10491 Posts user info edit post |
it doesnt apply to other teams playing nc state. did our guys actually think the refs were going to help them out? they're dumber than I thought 2/22/2006 11:57:34 PM |
StingrayRush All American 14628 Posts user info edit post |
you can go over a guy's back all you want as long as you don't push him. a friend of mine was a high school ref for 3 years and says there is no such call as "over the back," just a push 2/23/2006 12:30:41 AM |