State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6051476.html 3/22/2006 1:02:09 PM |
Pyro Suspended 4836 Posts user info edit post |
interesting 3/22/2006 3:21:04 PM |
Excoriator Suspended 10214 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Executives at Samsung, which has created nanotube TV prototypes, now tend to downplay the technology." |
/thread3/22/2006 3:34:46 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
You mean a company with heavy invest in another currently profitable technology, is downplaying something else because they aren't the leader in the new area?
You don't say 3/22/2006 3:48:05 PM |
Excoriator Suspended 10214 Posts user info edit post |
no, i'm saying that a company with a heavy interest in bringing a new technology to market is now downplaying that technology after having invested the engineering and resources to evaluate whether or not it has a MARR. 3/22/2006 5:04:56 PM |
lafta All American 14880 Posts user info edit post |
downplaying potentially a ground breaking technology is not going to stop it from being made. so they probably think its not worth the money
but whats sad is that as soon as brilliant scientists discover a new technology it immediately gets turned into a tv or some gadget to make the rest of us dumber 3/22/2006 5:17:55 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
forget nanotubes - go straight to laser, which actually works http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/03/business/03hdtv.html?_r=2&th&emc=th&oref=slogin&oref=slogin 4/4/2006 10:58:16 AM |
Excoriator Suspended 10214 Posts user info edit post |
o noes retinal damag0rz 4/4/2006 11:31:05 AM |