It's going to be released at 1:00 today showing the plane hitting the pentagon.

5/16/2006 11:23:35 AM

took 'em that long to make a realistic-looking cgi plane, huh?

5/16/2006 11:41:46 AM

lol

5/16/2006 11:50:22 AM

well, the edomites were going camping, and they wanted to borrow the camcorder

and they kinda lost the tape

but then last night, they wanted to tape the prison break finale, and they were looking for a tape

and bam

they found it

it also includes van-roof dancing footage

5/16/2006 11:54:51 AM

Like in Teen Wolf?

5/16/2006 12:12:52 PM

where can i see it?

5/16/2006 1:32:40 PM

it's still not out yet, but it's only stills and you can only see the nose cone.

5/16/2006 1:51:36 PM

have you guys seen this video before?

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main

it may be old - but it just makes me think there never was a plane

5/16/2006 2:25:16 PM

GTFO

5/16/2006 2:27:04 PM

sorry - i figured some hadnt seen it

5/16/2006 2:30:14 PM

it's ok

5/16/2006 2:39:35 PM

its the same tape everyone has seen for the past 2 or 3 years. they never "officially" released it until now.

5/16/2006 2:59:52 PM

These sh*theads or crackpots released a video which was similar of the old 5 frames again!

And guess what??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PLANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNE!!!



The judicial watch needs to employ FOIA to continue to pursue the FBI to get the 85 pentagon videos on 9/11. Why hasn't the videos of sheraton, citgo gas station been released (as the employee of the gas station stated that the FBI came in "within" minutes and confiscated the tapes) if they don't contain anything important?

Moral of the story today: The government has lied to you!!!

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 3:00 PM. Reason : .]

[Edited on May 16, 2006 at 3:00 PM. Reason : ,.]

5/16/2006 2:59:53 PM

it doesn't show a plane, thus there was no plane.

great logic.

5/16/2006 3:04:16 PM

Quote :

" MOON WORSHIPPERS!!! DARKSIDED! "

5/16/2006 3:41:51 PM

wait, so they just released the same damn video weve already seen for years?

5/16/2006 4:42:23 PM

Quote :

"it's ok"

No it's not

5/16/2006 5:07:49 PM

funny...i saw a plane...

5/16/2006 5:13:50 PM

it clearly shows the plane on two different cameras. looks like it hit the ground about 100 yards out and then hit the building

5/16/2006 5:14:00 PM

^ EDOMITE!

5/16/2006 5:14:10 PM

well, what happened was they got the guy that photoshopped the Dr. Flick photos, right? and they were like "hey, you did such a damned fine good job on those photos, how bout we give you your freedom if you do something with your talents that will serve our edomite big-nosed Jew Illuminati agenda... you game?" and the dude was like "fuck yeah! I thought Flick was on to us, so I was tryna bring her down... Heil Illuminati!!!"

5/16/2006 6:49:56 PM

hit the ground but bounced, leaving no marks

yea, i guess i can see how that would happen

5/16/2006 6:55:49 PM

ooooooooor, hit the ground, bounced, but the tin foil hats don't show you pictures where you can actually see where it hit the ground...

5/16/2006 6:57:46 PM

shut the fuck up it was a plane that hit it

5/16/2006 11:46:53 PM

^awww thats cute

5/17/2006 6:20:52 AM

There are some bored, dumb motherfuckers in this world. Ignoring the real scandals and making up their own.

5/17/2006 5:05:55 PM

i like how that video that claims it was a missile tries to imply that a missile wouldnt knock out adjacent windows either

5/17/2006 5:23:29 PM

5/17/2006 5:32:39 PM

is there a link to the video that was released today/yesterday?

5/17/2006 9:14:51 PM

Quote :

"it clearly shows the plane on two different cameras."

Please explain/demonstrate.

I'd like to have this shit put to rest for everyone, quite frankly.

5/17/2006 9:18:14 PM

ok...just found the videos...

in one video you only see a small part of whatever hit the pentagon...

the other one you can see more of it...

i am not saying that it was a missle or a jet that hit the pentagon but whatever hit the pentagon seemed smaller than what supposedly hit the pentagon...

5/17/2006 9:33:22 PM

ahh.. this takes me back ... to intro physics class.

Quote :

"a plane leaves chicago travelling 600 mph. the pentagon doesn't go anywhere."

i wanted to calculate the distance the 'plane' travels in the camera shot to go from the edge of the field of view into the building (with a camera angle 35-45 degrees) ..

fortunately, someone already did, and they wrote it all up.

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/math_geometry.html
conclusion:

Quote :

"450 feet traveled in 1/30th of a second = 13500 feet/sec. = 2.55 miles/sec. = 153.4 miles/min. = 9204.54 mph = 7997 kts. = Mach 12.11 "

remembering, of course, that a passenger jet probably wouldn't hit mach 1, especially after the 'hairpin' turn it supposedly took ..

5/17/2006 11:22:51 PM

This was a security camera, not a video camera. It wasn't snapping at 30 frames per second but closer to one frame per second.

So, to fix your calculations: to travel 450 feet in 1 second would require a speed of Mach 0.404

5/18/2006 1:07:23 AM

PWNT.

5/18/2006 1:11:14 AM

[Edited on May 18, 2006 at 8:16 AM. Reason : -]

5/18/2006 8:15:59 AM

damn i think you're right. i should've caught that

5/18/2006 9:26:27 AM