Quote :

"FBI Acknowledges: Journalists' Phone Records are Fair Game May 16, 2006 12:25 PM Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report: The FBI acknowledged late Monday that it is increasingly seeking reporters' phone records in leak investigations. "It used to be very hard and complicated to do this, but it no longer is in the Bush administration," said a senior federal official. The acknowledgement followed our blotter item that ABC News reporters had been warned by a federal source that the government knew who we were calling. The official said our blotter item was wrong to suggest that ABC News phone calls were being "tracked." "Think of it more as backtracking," said a senior federal official. But FBI officials did not deny that phone records of ABC News, the New York Times and the Washington Post had been sought as part of a investigation of leaks at the CIA. In a statement, the FBI press office said its leak investigations begin with the examination of government phone records. "The FBI will take logical investigative steps to determine if a criminal act was committed by a government employee by the unauthorized release of classified information," the statement said. Officials say that means that phone records of reporters will be sought if government records are not sufficient. Officials say the FBI makes extensive use of a new provision of the Patriot Act which allows agents to seek information with what are called National Security Letters (NSL). The NSLs are a version of an administrative subpoena and are not signed by a judge. Under the law, a phone company receiving a NSL for phone records must provide them and may not divulge to the customer that the records have been given to the government."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/fbi_acknowledge.html

This is a follow up from a previous story, that is posted below.

5/17/2006 12:49:32 AM

The Original Report:

Quote :

"Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling May 15, 2006 10:33 AM Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report: A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources. "It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation. ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls. Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation. One former official was asked to sign a document stating he was not a confidential source for New York Times reporter James Risen. Our reports on the CIA's secret prisons in Romania and Poland were known to have upset CIA officials. The CIA asked for an FBI investigation of leaks of classified information following those reports. People questioned by the FBI about leaks of intelligence information say the CIA was also disturbed by ABC News reports that revealed the use of CIA predator missiles inside Pakistan. Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers. The official who warned ABC News said there was no indication our phones were being tapped so the content of the conversation could be recorded. A pattern of phone calls from a reporter, however, could provide valuable clues for leak investigators. "

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html

5/17/2006 12:51:18 AM

First of all, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution that says "journalists have a right to secure telephone conversations"

Secondly, its good for the country, and its better than the alternative: explosions and anthrax and dirty bombs.

besides, Jesus approves.

5/17/2006 12:53:20 AM

This is definitely conducive to a free society.

5/17/2006 12:54:10 AM

hope the "journalists" get really mad

then think back to when they intercepted rescuer's phone/radio communications about the "survivors" in the west virginia mine

then they stfu

5/17/2006 10:20:34 AM

because that's totally the same thing

but hey, fucking around with first amendment freedoms can only lead to good things

5/17/2006 1:47:21 PM

yep...monitoring phone calls of the biased media...sounds like they basically just eliminated the 1st amendment for all americans!!!1111one

5/17/2006 4:23:22 PM

I don't really care if it's the media or not. It's an invasion of privacy for all Americans.

But at least I can sleep at night knowing that keeping tabs on domestic phone calls is keeping the turrists at bay.

5/17/2006 9:27:00 PM

Quote :

"First of all, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution that says "journalists have a right to secure telephone conversations" "

please to review amendments 4 and 5 ..

and anyway, fuck this logic of requiring the constitution to prove itself on every issue. you have it backwards man. Think to yourself: does this sound like it poses a liberty risk? is it giving unchecked power to the executive? the answer is yes on both counts, and that makes these NSLs BS.

5/17/2006 10:55:19 PM

^ oh, you thought i was being serious?

5/20/2006 2:56:09 AM