jegaines Veteran 309 Posts user info edit post |
Old topic is dead and can't be bumped.
I just started using Opera the other day, and I have come to the conclusion that Opera is way better. Mouse gestures are integrated and are not added on and work better than in FF, there is WAY more customization you can do with its interface, you just have to learn how to do it, and there's just so much more functionality. You have to use it for a day or two and learn some things before you get the hang of it.
FF is just very intuitive and caught on really quick, but Opera is the best if you take the time to really compare 7/28/2006 1:48:40 PM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
i tried opera for about a week back when nc state started giving out licenses or whatever happened. i really didn't like it that much. better than IE just for tabs, but other than that, I did not enjoy my browsing experience. I prefer FF but I might give Opera another go, since they've made some updates since then 7/28/2006 2:01:47 PM |
Petschska All American 1182 Posts user info edit post |
I have both on my computer, but I will never switch until Opera's adblocking improves. It's subpar in comparison. I didn't like any of the themes for opera either. And that sidebar is annoying. I couldn't get it fully gone. 7/28/2006 2:01:49 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
IE 7/28/2006 2:06:06 PM |
smoothcrim Universal Magnetic! 18966 Posts user info edit post |
opera's adblocking works fine. I've not had a single popup in years besides those irritating flash popups (I disable some of the irritating jscript functions). also, that sidebar goes away fully, very easily I might add. just disable the toggle button for the panel. I dunno about themes, I just let it use my windows theme 7/28/2006 2:20:07 PM |
Petschska All American 1182 Posts user info edit post |
i'm talking about in-site removal of flash and jpegs based upon user defined black lists and white lists.
I've tried the opera adblock hacks to do this and they didn't work or were not nearly as easy as firefox's adblock.
[Edited on July 28, 2006 at 2:29 PM. Reason : -] 7/28/2006 2:28:12 PM |
slut All American 8357 Posts user info edit post |
you're right.
firefox: 1 opera: eleventy-billion 7/28/2006 2:55:26 PM |
joe17669 All American 22728 Posts user info edit post |
I've been using Opera since maybe my freshman or sophomore year, and I use it almost exclusively for my everyday browsing. Firefox is good too, but at least on my computer, Opera seems to be a little bit faster.
I used to not like the sidebar on the left, but after keeping it there for a while, I realized how convenient it is.
I don't use the newsreader, IRC, mail, or bittorrent capabilities of Opera. I don't really like that all these feature are included in a web browser, but the application is so small, it doesn't bog it down at all. 7/28/2006 3:00:39 PM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
I like Opera better. It just works. Its super fast off the bat, so you don't have to install any extensions. Plus you can install themes w/o having to restart the browser which is awesome. The widget selection is pretty weak right now, but it will get better in time. I personally think they should make their own OS. Opera OS FTW!! 7/28/2006 3:00:43 PM |
joe17669 All American 22728 Posts user info edit post |
fuck themes. who gives a shit what their computers look like? the default look is fine 7/28/2006 3:06:01 PM |
esgargs Suspended 97470 Posts user info edit post |
The only system I like Opera on is on my cellphone. 7/28/2006 3:09:02 PM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "fuck themes. who gives a shit what their computers look like?" |
*Raises hand*7/28/2006 3:10:05 PM |
jegaines Veteran 309 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "and that sidebar is annoying. I couldn't get it fully gone." | 7/28/2006 3:11:14 PM |
Petschska All American 1182 Posts user info edit post |
I will agree that opera does seem to paint pages faster initially. But there are quite a few quirks that I couldn't deal with. 7/28/2006 3:26:19 PM |
wolfpack23 Veteran 402 Posts user info edit post |
yeah, I really like Opera also. However the Mac version crashes pretty frequently. Not sure why. Any other Mac users experienced this?
[Edited on July 28, 2006 at 3:30 PM. Reason : .] 7/28/2006 3:30:00 PM |
joe17669 All American 22728 Posts user info edit post |
It works great on my Mac, I've never had it crash on me. FF for the Mac, on the other hand, crashes quite frequently and is very slow 7/28/2006 3:37:18 PM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6099692.html
Quote : | "Opera is aiming for a day when people needn't use a full desktop operating system, instead using a browser and Web applications for most tasks." |
I am the prophet:
Quote : | "I personally think they should make their own OS. Opera OS FTW!!" |
7/28/2006 3:47:27 PM |
smcrawff Suspended 1371 Posts user info edit post |
Whats the memory footprint like compared to FF, any advantage? 7/28/2006 5:25:14 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
firefox does everything i need it to do, if i found a reason to switch i guess i would though 7/28/2006 5:31:31 PM |
TGD All American 8912 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "joe17669: It works great on my Mac, I've never had it crash on me. FF for the Mac, on the other hand, crashes quite frequently and is very slow" |
haha that's weird, b/c I've had the exact opposite experience. that's the main reason I don't touch Opera and use FF...7/28/2006 6:15:17 PM |
Kris All American 36908 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Whats the memory footprint like compared to FF, any advantage?" |
In my comparisons opera tended to be smaller, but other people have gotten other results, so it's tough to compare. The program itself, however is a good deal smaller7/28/2006 6:25:11 PM |
jegaines Veteran 309 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "firefox does everything i need it to do, if i found a reason to switch i guess i would though" |
The same could be said of IE.7/28/2006 6:29:01 PM |
drunknloaded Suspended 147487 Posts user info edit post |
^exactly...this is like telling someone that thinks memphis bbq is the best that lexington bbq is the best
it seems like people are not allowed to have opinions on tww sometimes
DAMN COMMUNISTS 7/28/2006 6:33:55 PM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
@ smcrawff
i've wondered about this too, and a lot of anecdotal evidence has been talked about on here in other threads, with results split pretty even. in the end, i prolly don't care about memory usage that much. at the least, the computers i use have a gig of ram, so browsing isn't typically gonna consume more than i have. as long as it loads quick initially, cycles through tabs quick, and renders at decent pace, it's all the same to me
[Edited on July 28, 2006 at 6:43 PM. Reason : how'd i get smoothcrim] 7/28/2006 6:43:00 PM |
Fry The Stubby 7784 Posts user info edit post |
FF +1 7/28/2006 6:57:59 PM |