Yesterday and today they've been air clips of mike wallace's 'interview', saying clin-ton got worked up and angry. I dont think clin-ton will be on faux news for a while.

9/24/2006 5:14:49 PM

he did get pretty pissed...you can you-tube some clips....kinda funny

9/24/2006 5:40:52 PM

Drudge's headline is "Purple-Faced Rage"

9/24/2006 5:45:36 PM

its funny how wallace was like 'we've been getting a lot email asking why you let bin laden go becuase we made up this movie that said you let bin laden go, so.....why did you let bin laden go?'

9/24/2006 6:06:53 PM

Is this a legitimate thread? No actual links to news articles. No debatable question. Just your assetion set in blog format.

9/24/2006 6:16:57 PM

anyone can see this interview, its viral.

9/24/2006 6:18:54 PM

another one liner

HURRAY!

9/24/2006 6:34:53 PM

Yep, I'm afraid this is a code blue thread.

9/24/2006 6:54:59 PM

clin-ton was the best president of all time. about 10% of our population believes this.

Quote :

"Only Abraham Lincoln (chosen by 15%) and John F. Kennedy (13%) finished ahead of Clinton (11%) in the April poll, which asked Americans who was "the greatest" president."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2003-05-26-wickham_x.htm

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 7:00 PM. Reason : 34]

9/24/2006 6:59:38 PM

I'm glad to see he was able to answer the accusations infront of the audience accusing him.

But instead of listening to his rebuttal, it's "omg he's so angry lol!"

9/24/2006 7:00:52 PM

why the fuck are you hyphenating it

9/24/2006 7:02:59 PM

9/24/2006 7:04:33 PM

Fox can try to spin it all they want to. He gave that reporter an education.

9/24/2006 7:13:25 PM

id say he pwned wallace when he asked him how many times hes ever asked on of the million bush people hes had on why did they do more to catch bin laden.

9/24/2006 7:14:42 PM

I havn't seen it, what did he teach him?

Did he feel his pain?


[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 7:24 PM. Reason : img]

9/24/2006 7:23:38 PM

Heh, I love reading EVERY other news outlet's take on the interview and comparing it to fox's...

9/24/2006 7:43:00 PM

full transcript of the interview is on think progress' website : http://thinkprogress.org/clinton-interview

major pwnt!

9/24/2006 7:54:00 PM

Quote :

"Only Abraham Lincoln (chosen by 15%) and John F. Kennedy (13%) finished ahead of Clinton (11%) in the April poll, which asked Americans who was "the greatest" president."

WTF did JFK do?

OMGJFKWTF?

9/24/2006 7:56:26 PM

Quote :

"youve got that little smirk and you think youre so clever"

clin-ton is not the first person to look at wallace's clown face and be creeped out, but he had the balls to say it.

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 8:14 PM. Reason : 2342 ]

9/24/2006 8:12:27 PM

I just read a radio tower nearby in Chapel Hill and saw it was 1360 am, gave it a listen, and it makes NPR look right of center. They were talking about how Clinton shouldn't be a topic of discussion at all while a bill is on the verge of being passed that would pardon the president for terror related law breaking b/c everyone who was discussing it on the national level was only discussing the CIA pardoning aspect. And it only went left from there..

9/24/2006 8:16:48 PM

ABORTIONS FOR ALL

9/24/2006 8:22:39 PM

Quote :

"clin-ton was the best president of all time. about 10% of our population believes this. Quote : "Only Abraham Lincoln (chosen by 15%) and John F. Kennedy (13%) finished ahead of Clinton (11%) in the April poll, which asked Americans who was "the greatest" president." http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/2003-05-26-wickham_x.htm "

IIRC, Bush was only a spot or 2 below Clinton on that poll.

9/24/2006 8:33:14 PM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6119737638039170671&q=clinton+fox

9/24/2006 8:33:31 PM

Quote :

"George W. Bush managed to tie Clinton for third place."

Why are either of them rated ahead of:

FDR
Teddy Roosevelt
Eisenhower
Washington
Adams
Jefferson
Jackson

Our country has no respect for history anymore, I swear. Short-term memory motherfuckers.

9/24/2006 8:36:22 PM

no shit

9/24/2006 8:38:11 PM

i cant wait to see these clips of him acting a fool.

also, while many of you claim im all over loving Bush, really the only thing I love about him is how he's taken the fight to the terrorists and made the US safer than it was before. We are stronger militarily now than we were. I also appreciate his stances on moral issues. He is mediocre on most else.

The best modern president was EASILY Reagan. We need him on some money!

9/24/2006 8:39:42 PM

clinton makes wallace look like the cunty moron he is.

9/24/2006 8:41:19 PM

Quote :

"I also appreciate his stances on moral issues."

well, evil people people admire evil ideology.

9/24/2006 8:46:13 PM

why are his idealogies considered evil?

9/24/2006 8:48:54 PM

randy admires them

9/24/2006 8:50:16 PM

Quote :

"why are his idealogies considered evil?"

because all idealogies are evil.

9/24/2006 8:55:10 PM

Quote :

"really the only thing I love about him is how he's taken the fight to the terrorists and made the US safer than it was before."

well all of the intelligence agencies seem to think the opposite

Quote :

"he best modern president was EASILY Reagan. We need him on some money!"

why? he is why we have modern terrorism. remember bierut? in case you forgot it was that little attack on marines where reagan cut and run instead of letting the marines go out and do their job.

9/24/2006 9:52:30 PM

Quote :

"The best modern president was EASILY Reagan. We need him on some money!"

Reagan (and Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc) got us into the mess we're in now. These attrocities that we suposedly deposed Saddam for happened during Reagan's watch. Reagan is to blame for Iraq and to some extent, Islamic Terrorism.

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 10:54 PM. Reason : ?]

9/24/2006 10:54:00 PM

I could just as easily blame Nixon, Ford, Carter, or Bush I.

You're viewing their actions and the events of the time in the context of the current conflict with islamic terrorists and middle eastern despots, not in the context of the struggle against communism that existed at the time. I'm not saying that they didn't play a role in setting the stage, but to wave your finger at them like you're doing is rather myopic.

9/24/2006 11:02:35 PM

I'm being tongue in cheek. You see, people are trying to pin all this on Clinton.

9/24/2006 11:30:15 PM

Two questions: (1) If the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are causing certain allegedly peace-loving peoples around the world to hate us, why was the United States of America attacked on September 11, 2001, which was prior to the beginning of these wars? And (2) if Clinton was SO goddamned smart and his policies SO loved by these allegedly peace-loving peoples, why did the first World Trade Center attack happen on his watch?

http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=24328

9/25/2006 5:15:40 AM

Quote :

"If the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are causing certain allegedly peace-loving peoples around the world to hate us, why was the United States of America attacked on September 11, 2001,"

Either

1. they used a time machine

2. nobody said people didnt used to hate/attack us---bush just made the problem 3x worse

i realize this is a highly sophisticated response and you couldnt have been expected to forsee this counter argument. now go die.

9/25/2006 5:20:47 AM

Quote :

"I'm being tongue in cheek. You see, people are trying to pin all this on Clinton."

no one is trying tp pin this all on clinton, and if you werent such a typical lefty who would go to the death defending Clintons legacy you would see this.
the truth is, people have been trying to blame the whole thing on GWB since 9-11...which is complete and utter bullcrap. libs are just pissed because its coming to light and they are being forced to admit that Clinton had as much responsibility for blowing it on UBL as everyone else did.

no one is saying Bush didnt screw up....but dont be a pryderi-esq moron and try to claim that Clinton is 100% not at fault

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 7:19 AM. Reason : asdf]

9/25/2006 7:17:06 AM

Quote :

"no one is trying tp pin this all on clinton, "

meet abc/fox

9/25/2006 7:29:34 AM

Quote :

"Clinton is 100% not at fault"

Not even Clinton is making this claim. If you can't aruge against what someone is actually saying, it's bad form to try to argue the ridiculous thing you wish they'd say instead.

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 7:36 AM. Reason : ]

9/25/2006 7:35:36 AM

Quote :

"FDR "

Because he was a shitty president whose economic policies likely prolonged the Depression, rather than ending it

and

Quote :

"Jackson"

Because he was as shitty president that basically committed genocide against Native Americans

Spot on with the rest of the list though.

9/25/2006 7:49:26 AM

yea but they were savages

9/25/2006 7:52:14 AM

whats "clin-ton"

i dont get it

9/25/2006 7:52:30 AM

Quote :

"But instead of listening to his rebuttal, it's "omg he's so angry lol!""

I hate to say it, but... Welcome to the American style of reporting the news

^serious? Go back and watch the Simpsons Treehouse of Horror 7.

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 8:05 AM. Reason : -]

9/25/2006 8:03:09 AM

Clinton probably shouldn't have kept referring to the Clarke book since it didn't really support his claim that he couldn't convince the military to go after osama after the Cole bombing. This is from Byron York:

Quote :

"Clinton did not give up in the sense of an executive who gives an order and then moves on to other things, thinking the order is being carried out when in fact it is being ignored. Instead, Clinton knew at the time that his top military and intelligence officials were dragging their feet on going after bin Laden and al Qaeda. He gave up rather than use his authority to force them into action. Examples are all over Clarke’s book. On page 223, Clarke describes a meeting, in late 2000, of the National Security Council “principals” — among them, the heads of the CIA, the FBI, the Attorney General, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the secretaries of State, Defense. It was just after al Qaeda’s attack on the USS Cole. But neither the FBI nor the CIA would say that al Qaeda was behind the bombing, and there was little support for a retaliatory strike. Clarke quotes Mike Sheehan, a State Department official, saying in frustration, “What’s it going to take, Dick? Who the shit do they think attacked the Cole, fuckin’ Martians? The Pentagon brass won’t let Delta go get bin Laden. Hell they won’t even let the Air Force carpet bomb the place. Does al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon to get their attention?”"

Entire column here:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDM4N2E1MzU5ZjQ0YTA3YmJiYzEyYjQ2ZDBiNWJlYjE=

9/25/2006 11:00:34 AM

Quote :

"But neither the FBI nor the CIA would say that al Qaeda was behind the bombing, and there was little support for a retaliatory strike."

That is exactly what he said in the interview, and supports his claim. What are you talking about?

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 11:43 AM. Reason : AND WHY IS TREETWISTA SITTING ON THE SIDELINES TODAY WHY ISN'T HE GRACING US WITH HIS STUPIDITY?]

9/25/2006 11:39:38 AM

Quote :

"meet abc/fox "

they are not saying that this is all clintons fault...the fact that you are interpreting this way is a testement to your undying devotion to a known liar and to the liberal blogosphere....please stop swallowing the bullcrap....abc/fox are not saying that Clinton is the only one responsible...they are saying that he too is responsible and that is more than your liberal bleeding heart can take...

Quote :

"Not even Clinton is making this claim. If you can't aruge against what someone is actually saying, it's bad form to try to argue the ridiculous thing you wish they'd say instead. "

all i said was that pryderi says things like this. and he does

if you cant keep up with what goes on here then you should really just keep your mouth shut. please refrain from arguing against things that you know nothing about and making yourself look like an idiot....

actually....by all means....continue

9/25/2006 1:08:36 PM

wallace said on faux news at 1:30 that clin-ton told his aids if they ever fuck up again and get him in this situation again he will fire them all. damn

^did you see path to 911? i thought not. so youre wrong.

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 1:34 PM. Reason : 243 ]

9/25/2006 1:33:13 PM

watched the whole thing boss,
sooo...yeah...your wrong...

9/25/2006 1:35:13 PM

and what about the scene where sandy says clinton didnt want them to kill bin laden becuase of political fall out?

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 1:45 PM. Reason : dumbass]

9/25/2006 1:45:01 PM