First up for Earl. Please explain, in detail.

Quote :

""If you can break WEP, you can sniff out source mac addresses and spoof allowed addresses trivially." There are so many fallacies in this statement, I don't know where to begin. This is not always true in most cases."

10/16/2006 9:59:07 AM

I was wondering when the call out for that statement would go down.

10/16/2006 10:03:30 AM

I probably know more than you'd ever dream about computers, don't make me call you out. Like I told the other guy, you don't wish to venture there with me! Oh no pa'l. Not today.

10/16/2006 10:07:25 AM

iamges.google.com

yes the typo is correct

i bet if you bought this domain you would get lots and lots of hits

or maybe gogole.com?

i remember linux bought the domain 'microsfot.com' which seems pretty clever

any other similiar circumstances you guys know of?

10/16/2006 10:10:25 AM

^ Is that supposed to be in this thread?

10/16/2006 12:09:24 PM

^^ besides, gogole.com is registered by google and redirects to google.com

10/16/2006 12:14:27 PM

^^^^^^ haha, yea i know you know he won't (can't?) explain it, but that's good. it's amusing how capable he is of spewing random ^^^^ words that are full of air. should be interesting if he decides to bless us with his presence again.

^^ i'm trying to find the connection as well

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 12:18 PM. Reason : +1^]

10/16/2006 12:17:55 PM

sober's post is a quote - he just didn't put it in a quote tag i believe

10/16/2006 12:20:17 PM

Quote :

"dad-gom"

funniest thing i read in all his posts

besides Bobby's "I am a homosexual" edit lol

10/16/2006 12:37:48 PM

Quote :

"sober's post is a quote - he just didn't put it in a quote tag i believe"

It's also by TreeTwista10, iirc.

10/16/2006 12:47:30 PM

^that's what i was thinking too

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 1:51 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 1:49:42 PM

why lock a thread if you are just going to remake the thread to bash the same person? deserving or not. doesn't that defeat the purpose of moderating.

10/16/2006 2:50:31 PM

Excellent query.

The other thread was not an Earl Bashing thread.

This one is, and is thus on-topic.

10/16/2006 3:00:29 PM

i think he's just trying to condense the idiocy...

10/16/2006 3:00:44 PM

Yea just trying to give Earl a place to put his ramblings, so we can keep the other threads on topic

10/16/2006 3:47:23 PM

Quote :

"why lock a thread if you are just going to remake the thread to bash the same person? deserving or not. doesn't that defeat the purpose of moderating."

I couldn't agree with you more. I really question the maturity level around this place. Bobby-d got angry at me because I disagreed with him before. If a thread goes off topic, its because of you guys. Not me. It's you that choose to waste your time insulting/patronizing my intelligence when you know nothing about me.

But, when you post and I say "blah blah blah dosn't make sense or has x amount of fallacies" that's just me calling you out. It's nothing to start a revolt about. Hey Bobby-d, do you think you're correct about everything you post and there is absolutely no other ways but your way? If I see something wrong, im going to call it out every time.

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 7:00 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 6:56:18 PM

you didn't even TRY to back up anything you said

you huge douche

10/16/2006 7:08:00 PM

You have yet to point out any fallacies in this statement:

"If you can break WEP, you can sniff out source mac addresses and spoof allowed addresses trivially."

All you have done is claim that there are "so many fallacies that you don't know where to begin."

I implore you to find a way to begin. If you are such a genius, it should be pretty easy to do. Unless you're bluffing.

10/16/2006 7:18:13 PM

Bobby-d you never answered my question.

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 7:39 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 7:35:34 PM

Here, I'll humor you

Quote :

"Hey Bobby-d, do you think you're correct about everything you post and there is absolutely no other ways but your way?"

no.

Now, are you going to man up and refute the original statement or is everyone correct in assuming that you're full of shit?

10/16/2006 7:41:00 PM

I'm voting for "Full of Shit".

10/16/2006 7:43:04 PM

Bobby-d, I would refute what you said. But you see, I lost trust in you and we're going to have to work

this thing out one way or another. I had typed a small explanation and you edited it.

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 7:45 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 7:44:44 PM

2 words, cop out.

10/16/2006 7:52:21 PM

Quote :

"Had this one customer with 5.5 years of uptime on one of their routers"

http://brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=81377

It all started with this statement. Now, an uptime like this is quite odd. 5.5 yrs is long, the cases I've heard about are normaly 4.5-5. But it's no anomaly. When I told him this, he got mad and started swearing and told me "get out of my thread". I attempted to explain myself, that's when he edited my post. To keep me from winning the argument and rendering the entire thread useless. Im no slouch when it comes to this stuff. I've learned from the best.

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 8:03 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 8:01:01 PM

^ So are you ever going to answer the question posed in this thread or are you just going to continue rambling on?

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 8:04 PM. Reason : o]

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 8:05 PM. Reason : o]

10/16/2006 8:04:11 PM

I'm voting for "Full of Shit".

10/16/2006 8:17:00 PM

He's just a troll.

10/16/2006 8:19:17 PM

this was the other one:

Quote :

""only because most companies perform scheduled software upgrades on a semi-regular basis" Wrong once again. That statement has so many fallacies in it, I don't know where to begin."

anyone else get a PM like this from Earl?:

Quote :

" From : Earl To : Prospero Received : Sunday October 15, 2006 at 12:55 AM Subject : Dont order me, or patronize me. Okay! You listen, pal. Ive explained myself before in that last thread about routers. What did he (the mod Bobbydigital) do, he edited my post and made it say "I am a homosexual". So im not going to argue with him on these boards no more, if he's going to resort to cheap internet vulgarities like that. And as far as you, Ive probably configured more routers than you've seen up close. Don't challenge me. You don't want to get on my "bad list". No way jose. Its not going down, dog pound. Earl"

dude Earl, i'm just calling you out to explain yourself. if you only explained yourself, i wouldn't hold a beef.

[Edited on October 16, 2006 at 8:26 PM. Reason : .]

10/16/2006 8:22:02 PM

Did you really edit one of his posts to say "i am gay". Because wrong or not, that makes you the bigger faggot.

10/16/2006 8:25:49 PM

Quote :

"You don't want to get on my "bad list"."

So is PM'ing vieled threats enough to get you banned?

10/16/2006 9:52:48 PM

FUCK EARL AND ANYONE WHO TAKES HIM SERIOUSLY

10/16/2006 9:55:38 PM

i don't understand why this douche hasn't been banned yet and others have been banned for sneezing

10/16/2006 10:34:47 PM

because bobby's not a shitty mod and always has fun trolling people

10/16/2006 10:46:31 PM

you suck earl

10/16/2006 10:58:06 PM

Quote :

"So is PM'ing vieled threats enough to get you banned?"

well if so, then mods editing posts to say stuff like 'i'm gay' should be auto termination for abuse of power. and yes i am also awear that non-mods can do the same thing.

10/17/2006 12:01:33 AM

Quote :

"because bobby's not a shitty mod and always has fun trolling people"

Earl is under his skin. Perhaps you dont know how the internet works.

10/17/2006 12:12:50 AM

hahaha, this thread gives me joy. i want Earl to stick around for a long time ... because the longer he's around, we'll start calling n00bs by a different word ... Earls. no wait, that'd be a mean thing to call the n00bs. i digress.

btw Earl, still waiting on an explanation.

10/17/2006 1:18:09 AM

First up for Earl. Please explain, in detail.

Quote :

""If you can break WEP, you can sniff out source mac addresses and spoof allowed addresses trivially." There are so many fallacies in this statement, I don't know where to begin. This is not always true in most cases."

Last I checked, I was not Bobby and I created this thread out of my own volition. So why don't you MAN UP and explain your amazing insight on this topic Earl?

10/17/2006 10:22:53 AM

WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT SOME ANONYMOUS HACKS EXPLANATION?

STOP TRYING TO WIN THE INTERNET

SO WHAT IF HE IS RIGHT OR IF HE IS WRONG?

ITS ALREADY IN YOUR MIND THAT HE BLOWS AND YOU WON

DO YOU REALLY NEED A POST FROM HIM TO AFFIRM HIS STUPIDITY?

LETS MOVE ON

10/17/2006 10:24:48 AM

because a) He keeps backpedaling out of threads constantly (hmm who does that remind us of?) and if I get shit about it, you damn well better believe I'm going to return the favor.

and b) If he has some magical new insight, it would be worth the massive bullshit to get to it.

10/17/2006 10:26:28 AM

Quote :

"WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT SOME ANONYMOUS HACKS EXPLANATION? STOP TRYING TO WIN THE INTERNET SO WHAT IF HE IS RIGHT OR IF HE IS WRONG? ITS ALREADY IN YOUR MIND THAT HE BLOWS AND YOU WON DO YOU REALLY NEED A POST FROM HIM TO AFFIRM HIS STUPIDITY? LETS MOVE ON"

10/17/2006 10:40:23 AM

Hey, for those who don't care

AKA Quinn/State409c, guess what? Just don't click on the damn thread. Or are you really that drawn to this?

10/17/2006 10:42:08 AM

i just think you of all people would have more intrests than someone proving 3=-9

10/17/2006 10:48:39 AM

yea well im sitting in a 3 hour meeting, and my only glimmer of sunshine is the hope that maybe Earl will come in here and answer my question

10/17/2006 10:51:14 AM

He replied 4 times to this thread and didn't answer, do you honestly think you can goad him into answering now?

All this amounts to is entertainment for you. Take it to Chit Chat, especially after 1 thread was deleted.

I've had more serious threads deleted for less.

10/17/2006 11:28:52 AM

yeah this is kind of like kicking a retarded third grader while he's down.

10/17/2006 12:12:38 PM

It's only getting retarded because all of you dimwits keep egging him on, versus letting him answer the damn question.

Bobby should delete all the damn posts in this thread except for the first one and let it sit here for him to answer

10/17/2006 12:23:38 PM

durr

[Edited on October 17, 2006 at 12:37 PM. Reason : wrong thread]

10/17/2006 12:37:25 PM

my vote is earl = jackleg trolling tech talk, since amersterdamwhateverthefuck has gone under the radar as of late

10/17/2006 12:48:55 PM

Earl

Quote :

"Hey Bobby-d, do you think you're correct about everything you post and there is absolutely no other ways but your way?"

BobbyDigital

Quote :

"no."

The answer lies between me and bobby-d. He knows that I know the truth. I truthfully fear being suspended for no warranted reason, other than disagreeing with a moderator. The last thing I want is to be silenced for bearing the truth. And to have my work edited against my will.

[/THREAD]

10/17/2006 3:29:36 PM