Is it:

1. Corruption

2. Cronyism

3. Incompetence

4. Torture

5. Illegal Wiretapping

6. Iraq War

7. Wreckless Spending

8. All of the above

10/27/2006 3:02:12 PM

IBTL (and if there is a God) IBTB

10/27/2006 3:02:46 PM

Ok if it's not those things, tell me why?

10/27/2006 3:04:03 PM

Another brilliant thread by pryderi.

10/27/2006 3:05:11 PM

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:20 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2006 3:05:56 PM

Quote :

"IBTL (and if there is a God) IBTB"

One last swing before going down.

10/27/2006 3:06:53 PM

why do you even make threads like this?

10/27/2006 3:07:48 PM

Bye Mr Joshua!

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:10 PM. Reason : http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=441240]

10/27/2006 3:09:17 PM

i'm just curious.

10/27/2006 3:10:11 PM

Because I don't think anyone that supports Bush and the GOP can come up with an answer that isn't false.

10/27/2006 3:10:50 PM

Bush > Cock

10/27/2006 3:12:25 PM

what a stupid answer

10/27/2006 3:13:35 PM

^yep

what a stupid thread

10/27/2006 3:13:58 PM

If there isn't a thread like this already, then why not let it be a valid thread?

You can choose to be offended by his items, or you can add 9, 10 , 11, etc.

10/27/2006 3:14:45 PM

IT'S NOT HIS VIEWS, ITS HOW HE PRESENTS THEM

btw there is a thread like this...multiple ones...all by pryderi...all unneccessary

10/27/2006 3:15:23 PM

Bye TreeTwista

10/27/2006 3:17:01 PM

Because the thread is nothing but baiting. If he had said something like "IMO, the bush administration is involved in 1-9" Is there any reason to support the administration?

or something like that

It would be valid. But he did it just to be a jew about it. Also, with the gay NSFW post here now, there is no reason for him to be allowed to continue on this message board.

10/27/2006 3:17:29 PM

i'm sure you'll be back before long pryderi

10/27/2006 3:17:36 PM

cya bgmims and McDanger

10/27/2006 3:18:03 PM

^^nah. I'll be suspended or banned.

10/27/2006 3:18:26 PM

well if you're suspended, i'm sure you'll be back soon

10/27/2006 3:18:45 PM

I doubt it. My last suspension lasted months.

10/27/2006 3:19:30 PM

it depends what your definition of the word 'soon' is

10/27/2006 3:20:13 PM

It'll prolly be a ban.

10/27/2006 3:20:40 PM

why do you want to get suspended? why not just try to join in on civil discourse instead of doing shit like this?

whats the point

10/27/2006 3:21:39 PM

whatever happened to that "bye soapbox" shit?

10/27/2006 3:25:12 PM

I don't really see how this is any different than what Twista does.

I mean, don't get me wrong, it doesn't need to be here. I'm just saying, if pryderi needs to be gone, so do some other folks.

10/27/2006 3:28:19 PM

I'll be at campusblender.com

10/27/2006 3:28:27 PM

^^you dont see a lot of shit thats right in front of your face

10/27/2006 3:29:59 PM

o< o<

10/27/2006 3:30:32 PM

when did state409c get such a raging hard on for treetwista?

10/27/2006 3:31:12 PM

Quote :

"I mean, don't get me wrong, it doesn't need to be here. I'm just saying, if pryderi needs to be gone, so do some other folks."

Trolling is a bitch and should definitely be stopped.

But creating threads that don't have anything to do really with debate is a whole other level of "Ban this piece of ass"

Trust me, this isn't just because he's liberal.

IMO, the only non-serious thread allowed in the Soap Box are the kinds along the lines of the Titanic Fraud.

10/27/2006 3:31:33 PM

wow, people actually liked the Titanic Fraud.

10/27/2006 3:32:44 PM

Quote :

"raging hard on"

funny you use that adjective...i think dude is roid ragin on steroids myself

10/27/2006 3:33:55 PM

Quote :

"But creating threads that don't have anything to do really with debate is a whole other level of "Ban this piece of ass""

I see alot of locked threads that didn't result in a ban....

10/27/2006 3:35:50 PM

He actually took the time to photoshop that picture of Duke.

At least an hour.

Of staring at him

10/27/2006 3:37:03 PM

Quote :

"when did state409c get such a raging hard on for treetwista?"

When it became apparent that he really isn't even on a college level in regards to being able to discuss topics here.

The sad thing about pryderi is, I think he actually as a grasp of the issues, he is just mind numbingly left about it all.

Twista, on the other hand, can't make a post if it isn't something he copied from Hannity, Colmes, or a Bush speech.

Ultimately, the two are extremely similar.

The only thing really spererating them is Twista doesn't go out of his way to create dumb threads, he just dumbs them up when he posts in them.

10/27/2006 3:38:32 PM

Well, in my own defense, I try to provide sources and references....

10/27/2006 3:40:12 PM

Quote :

"He actually took the time to photoshop that picture of Duke. At least an hour. Of staring at him"

It wasn't that hard. It took about 15-20 minutes start to finish. I've done a lot of photoshopping.

See the "Photoshop esgargs thread"

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:42 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2006 3:42:07 PM

and you make it worse by name calling and telling people to "get out of here, you're an idiot"


but i guess you don't see that


ps, anger management

10/27/2006 3:42:19 PM

Quote :

"and you make it worse by name calling and telling people to "get out of here, you're an idiot" but i guess you don't see that"

More often than not, I'm the target of ad-hominem attacks, not the instigator.

10/27/2006 3:43:35 PM

15-20 minutes of magnified Duke

How many minutes of searching through gay porn?

10/27/2006 3:43:58 PM

^^^perhaps 490c is right. i mean, some people just arent mentally equipped to be able to discuss things in a rational way in the soapbox and we'd all be better off without them.

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:44 PM. Reason : ,n]

10/27/2006 3:44:22 PM

Quote :

"Twista, on the other hand, can't make a post if it isn't something he copied from Hannity, Colmes, or a Bush speech."

if you could find a trace of evidence of that i would never post on TWW again

Quote :

"Ultimately, me (State409c) and TreeTwista are extremely similar."

i fixed it for you you naive arrogant steroid addict

10/27/2006 3:44:42 PM

Quote :

"perhaps 490c is right. i mean, some people just arent mentally equipped to be able to discuss things in a rational way in the soapbox and we'd all be better off without them"

it's not his place to decide that and it ultimately makes this place even worse

10/27/2006 3:46:16 PM

Quote :

"and you make it worse by name calling and telling people to "get out of here, you're an idiot""

I wouldn't have to resort to that if other folks here didn't dumb the place down. Is it not painfully obvious that a lot of folks with a lot of good commentary...intelligent folks (Grumpy, McDanger, various others) don't post in here anymore because the section has been shat upon?

I'll concede, my constant flame wars aren't helping. But it wasn't like I started it all. When I came back a few weeks ago, Twista was already being hated on. I just took up the cause. Everyone else gave up because duke doesn't give a fuck.

I'll put my money where my mouth is, if it doesn't get better with those 3 (tree, trikk, pry) not posting for a week (while I continue to post), then I won't post for 3 months.

10/27/2006 3:46:42 PM

Quote :

" wouldn't have to resort to that if I had an ounce of fucking self control"

fixed it for you

Quote :

"When I came back a few weeks ago, Twista was already being hated on. I just took up the cause."

so fucking what? you're being hated on now...does that mean new users should "just take up the cause"? you are fucking pathetic

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:47 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2006 3:47:16 PM

you don't get it though


it's not your place to dumb the soap box down even more by doing what you do

10/27/2006 3:47:40 PM

Quote :

"I see alot of locked threads that didn't result in a ban.... "

Agree, but most of those threads weren't created by constant trolls. I mean a few of us serious posters can get by with a joke thread or some shit every now and again. Randy, J#, pryderi, Twista, etc. cannot.

I don't even think I could get by doing that kind of shit, so I simply don't.

__
And titanic fraud was one of the funniest threads in history.

[Edited on October 27, 2006 at 3:49 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2006 3:48:40 PM

You seem to only have a problem with me. Are you blind to the fact that even if I ignored those two ass clowns (and I did for 24 hrs) that the site will still be shitty?

Do I need to point you to pages 2-3 of the language manip thread where tree got completely owned by folks other than myself and continued to insist on posting in it?

10/27/2006 3:49:20 PM