theshadow New Recruit 3 Posts user info edit post |
Talk about being a sore loser; Tom Delay, former Republican House Majority leader, said after yesterday's Democratic sweep of the house:
"The Democrats didn't win," he said, "Republicans lost."
Hmmmm......Is it just me, or are they the same thing? 11/8/2006 11:19:37 AM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
Well it is just you.
What he's saying is that it wasn't that democrats won because they are such a great option, it is that people were fed up with republicans and they lost out because of it.
This is simple logic, but for a stupid alias, I bet you do have trouble.
Never played a sport, huh?
[Edited on November 8, 2006 at 11:25 AM. Reason : s] 11/8/2006 11:25:07 AM |
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "What he's saying is that it wasn't that democrats won because they are such a great option, it is that people were fed up with republicans and they lost out because of it" |
11/8/2006 11:28:51 AM |
yougotme Starting Lineup 65 Posts user info edit post |
so wait, if you only have 2 choices, and you choose one because you don't like the other, that doesn't count as the one you chose winning?
don't be sore losers, guys.
and no, I'm not back. I just really wanted to gloat 11/8/2006 11:39:22 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148446 Posts user info edit post |
werent plenty of people like "well i dont know what the democrats have to offer, but anything is better than what we have now" 11/8/2006 11:41:38 AM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
I'm not being a sore loser.
Lets say you have a choice to die by hanging or being eaten by rats and you don't choose hanging...
Do you like eaten by rats?
I just pwnt you. 11/8/2006 11:42:07 AM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148446 Posts user info edit post |
some of the people that died on 9/11 loved jumping out of skyscrapers
its not like they just didnt want to die by fire 11/8/2006 11:44:36 AM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
I wonder if he's going to come back to tell me that I'm right? 11/8/2006 11:45:30 AM |
Kris All American 36908 Posts user info edit post |
He's right, democrats didn't win, and republicans lost, and america won. 11/8/2006 12:00:53 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148446 Posts user info edit post |
yeah america won
now we're gonna be in an unjust war AND pay higher taxes
its a win win! 11/8/2006 12:03:43 PM |
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "now we're gonna be in an unjust war" |
want to make sure we get that on the record11/8/2006 12:05:27 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "He's right, democrats didn't win, and republicans lost, and america won." |
I'm not sure America won or lost. We should probably wait and see, right? I think one of the things we will get though, is to find out how much power the presidential branch of government has right now. I think its too much, and so a democratic majority with an adamant republican presidency will certainly grind together a bit.11/8/2006 12:07:11 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148446 Posts user info edit post |
^^dont forget about the Clinton-era taxes 11/8/2006 12:08:29 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
Twista, you better get on the "it was a botched joke" spin immediately 11/8/2006 12:09:22 PM |
sober46an3 All American 47925 Posts user info edit post |
haha...keep in mind those taxes are going to PAY for that war. 11/8/2006 12:09:32 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148446 Posts user info edit post |
no they'll probably pay for some art museums and other pork bullshit 11/8/2006 12:10:48 PM |
rwoody Save TWW 37696 Posts user info edit post |
when incumbents lose, they almost always lose as opposed to the other side winning. elections are retroactive referendums on the incumbents ability to govern. 11/8/2006 12:10:53 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
^Very correct.
This has actually happened to every president in history except Clinton (the 6th year itch).
The reason it didn't happen to Clinton was because he already got pwned during his 2nd year when the Republican Revolution happened. He could lose any seats, because he'd already lost so many. 11/8/2006 12:14:16 PM |
TaterSalad All American 6256 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "What he's saying is that it wasn't that democrats won because they are such a great option, it is that people were fed up with republicans and they lost out because of it. " |
11/8/2006 12:17:02 PM |
Madman All American 3412 Posts user info edit post |
Ha, whatever. A win's a win. People always have the option of NOT VOTING to show their lack of support for both parties; instead they DID VOTE for Democrats. Take it like men, boys. 11/8/2006 12:29:41 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
I actually wanted the dems to win the house, so you really don't have to worry about me being a sore loser.
But you bring up a good point, what were the turnout numbers like this time around? 11/8/2006 12:37:39 PM |
SandSanta All American 22435 Posts user info edit post |
Well the difference between democrats and republicans from my perspective is this:
With republicans, my taxes stay even and the government spends an assload.
With dems: My taxes rise, and the government spends an assload. 11/8/2006 12:56:42 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
You must be mistaken, the taxes only rise on Bill Gates, they promised me
Unless you also mean capital gains tax (which the dems BETTER extend) 11/8/2006 1:02:47 PM |
theDuke866 All American 52839 Posts user info edit post |
why in the hell would you WANT capital gains tax? 11/8/2006 1:08:19 PM |
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
^ 11/8/2006 1:11:24 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
oh sorry, I thought you guys were privy to tax law.
I was referring to the capital gains tax rate reduction that is set to run out in 2010.
Capital gains tax will resume being at ordinary income tax rates after that time. 11/8/2006 1:23:42 PM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
bush just said that "iraq had a big part" of some of the races, but that lots of democratic candidates had "really strong campaigns" and "turn out the vote" campaigns on the dem side. 11/8/2006 1:37:41 PM |
bgmims All American 5895 Posts user info edit post |
And? 11/8/2006 1:38:22 PM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
just sayin'. a different point of view from delay. that's all. 11/8/2006 1:38:52 PM |