Vote for #1 plz...i'll be forever indebted to you

http://www.pureexpressionsphotography.com/news/?p=984


thx u (for voting for #1)

9/30/2007 12:04:55 AM

i like 3 or 5 more

9/30/2007 12:05:55 AM

Quote :

"Answers Votes Percent 1. 1 615 50% 2. 2 521 43% 3. 3 32 3% 4. 4 15 1% 5. 5 36 3%"

i dont think you have anything to worry about

9/30/2007 12:06:59 AM

done

[Edited on September 30, 2007 at 12:17 AM. Reason : Oooh I'd love to apprentice for those ladies.]

9/30/2007 12:16:39 AM

I was sold on #1 solely by the fact that she is holding a Hello Kitty.

9/30/2007 1:09:47 AM

i was torn because there were many young, supple blondes.

9/30/2007 1:11:29 AM

#3 is by far and away the best photo.

but obviously friends/family of #1 and #2 have gamed the system so hard, the best one doesnt have a chance.

9/30/2007 2:09:20 AM

gamed the system so hard? please. if gaming = asking people to vote then yeah, we've been gaming.

VOTE FOR #1 PLZ


http://www.pureexpressionsphotography.com/news/?p=984

9/30/2007 2:15:09 PM

you're welcome.

9/30/2007 2:20:08 PM

Answers  	 Votes  	 Percent
1. 	
	1 	710 	53%
2. 	
	2 	535 	40%
3. 	
	3 	41 	3%
4. 	
	4 	15 	1%
5. 	
	5 	38 	3%

9/30/2007 2:23:49 PM

what do you get out of winning this?

9/30/2007 2:33:29 PM

/message_topic.aspx?topic=496242

9/30/2007 2:36:42 PM

wow... hands down #3 is the best. Short of a few washed out looking colors and a few less inches of flower on her face and it's a GREAT shot.

However, we see whats up with the skewing here. One thread voting #2, one #1, and the 'actual' voters ringing in like 50 votes each. Therefore, I shall implore this tactic in the near future. Good work!

9/30/2007 4:06:09 PM

+1

9/30/2007 4:23:14 PM

i voted for #4

9/30/2007 4:30:40 PM

Damn u mario

Get with the program

Vote for #1

Easily the cutest kid there (though ive seen better pictures of her)

9/30/2007 7:33:36 PM

And done.

9/30/2007 7:35:40 PM

voted for #1

9/30/2007 8:46:33 PM

Shameless exploitation of children


I still voted, tho.

[Edited on September 30, 2007 at 10:01 PM. Reason : didn't we do this a few weeks ago?]

9/30/2007 10:01:05 PM