Lionheart I'm Eggscellent 12775 Posts user info edit post |
so I've got one machine I'm using as just file storage right now and I'm thinking of "retiring" another soon into the same sort of role, but I want to establish a single accessible file system with some level of redundancy since right now if a drive crashes I'm just screwed.
any suggestions, recommendations, experiences? 10/3/2007 1:51:54 AM |
GraniteBalls Aging fast 12262 Posts user info edit post |
open filer
fat 32
RAID 1 10/3/2007 8:31:06 AM |
Opstand All American 9256 Posts user info edit post |
You can cluster with OpenFiler too.
Although I'd just set up 2 of them independent of each other and map the network drives to another box, then use some 3rd party software to mirror the data between to two filers. Probably would be much easier and theoretically you could create a DR type solution instead of just clustering (because I imagine you aren't pushing enough operations to demand a clustered solution from a performance standpoint). You could use the nicer of the two boxes as the primary and then keep the second as a backup only.
And as GraniteBalls said, depending on how many disks you have, configure them in RAID 1 or 5 on each machine. 10/3/2007 10:11:58 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
raid 5 ftw 10/3/2007 11:33:15 AM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
what's the deal with openfiler? i saw it mentioned in another thread too. i looked at it briefly but couldn't figure out what's so great about it 10/3/2007 11:35:19 AM |
synapse play so hard 60939 Posts user info edit post |
file servers are perfect for :message_topic.aspx?topic=118820 ] 10/3/2007 11:35:55 AM |
Opstand All American 9256 Posts user info edit post |
^^ It's essentially a free OS that you can use on some old equipment that will give you a system with features people normally pay thousands of $$ for. Obviously your hardware may be a constraint and you need to know a little about configuring this kind of stuff, but in essence you can create a very bad ass storage system for next to nothing. 10/3/2007 4:36:19 PM |
Lionheart I'm Eggscellent 12775 Posts user info edit post |
I've got access to the Datacenter and Enterprise Editions of Server 2003 via MSDNAA, and being more generally windows minded, are these a pain in the ass to set up and administer? 10/16/2007 2:29:56 AM |
Aficionado Suspended 22518 Posts user info edit post |
not really
i tried it out before i set up an ubuntu server with samba (i have to use *nix at school and needed some practice on administering a *nix server)
it expects a domain when you set it up...you dont have to use an AD if you dont want 10/16/2007 10:41:23 AM |