392 Suspended 2488 Posts user info edit post |
should have not == should'ven't
and
you would have == you'd've
meh
1/10 10/5/2007 5:38:56 PM |
TenaciousC All American 6307 Posts user info edit post |
I'll support this 10/5/2007 5:42:17 PM |
synapse play so hard 60908 Posts user info edit post |
usetacould? 10/5/2007 5:44:19 PM |
FykalJpn All American 17209 Posts user info edit post |
i wouldn't've made this thread 10/5/2007 5:44:27 PM |
Republican18 All American 16575 Posts user info edit post |
yay for grammar 10/5/2007 5:45:54 PM |
elkaybie All American 39626 Posts user info edit post |
i would say "shouldn't've" 10/5/2007 6:42:40 PM |
Kurtis636 All American 14984 Posts user info edit post |
I actually do say you'd've occasionally. 10/5/2007 6:47:45 PM |
puppy All American 8888 Posts user info edit post |
"should'nt've" sounds better than "should'ven't" 10/5/2007 7:13:19 PM |
dustm All American 14291 Posts user info edit post |
i hate it when people think of and have are the same word 10/5/2007 7:19:22 PM |
392 Suspended 2488 Posts user info edit post |
well, should not == shouldn't
but, not have != not've
or does it?10/5/2007 7:54:49 PM |
smc All American 9221 Posts user info edit post |
don't've 10/5/2007 8:58:43 PM |