2/25/2008 1:16:21 AM

does the bud light come with it?

2/25/2008 2:09:40 AM

is that 4x4? if so thats bad ass

2/25/2008 3:20:52 AM

That truck has a lot of potential.

Too bad we do not have a clue what the seller wants for it.

[Edited on February 25, 2008 at 6:16 AM. Reason : .]

2/25/2008 6:12:17 AM

If you look at the hubs on the front it looks like it probably is.

2/25/2008 9:03:35 AM

Quote :

"That truck has a lot of potential. Too bad we do not have a clue what the seller wants for it."

Or things like what engine, 4x4 or not (yes, the front hubs do point toward it), what problems it has, what year it is (I can narrow it down to '58-'60 but not sure between those three...)

2/25/2008 11:18:43 AM

Actually it's got a '60 hood and a '59 grille, so pretty much impossible to visually ID the year. Maybe the original poster will come back and tell us?

2/25/2008 11:57:10 AM

it's definitely 4wd (59 was the first year from the factory fyi, there were aftermarket conversions before that though). i'll also wager it's definitely a 59 with a 60 hood judging from the lower panel and square turn/parking lights.

2/26/2008 11:23:19 PM

two threads?

2/26/2008 11:45:34 PM

HERE is the info

1960 Ford F-100
on the late 80s waggoneer frame and motor


4x4

motor: AMC 354 V8
runs good

runs fine
driven once a week

been offered $1500 but is looking atleast $1800

more pics and more details if needed

3/6/2008 2:59:01 PM

Well that's random.

I'm surprised the wheelbase matches that well...

3/6/2008 4:17:42 PM

Do you have pictures of the back end, or interior?

3/6/2008 5:09:15 PM

Quote :

"motor: AMC 354 V8"

uhhh... what? no such thing.

that's also definitely not a waggy d44 on the front. that axle has external hubs, waggy's had internal.

3/6/2008 5:26:30 PM

It's a trap!

he's really a Nigerian banker

3/6/2008 7:54:27 PM

bigblue gonna tell him what's up

3/6/2008 7:57:21 PM

that was the information given to me by my brother who owns the truck

he may have the numbers off of the engine

but it is a waggoneer frame and engine

3/6/2008 10:02:35 PM

i want!!!

[Edited on March 6, 2008 at 10:13 PM. Reason : amc 304???? or didnt they make a 401????or a 360???]

3/6/2008 10:12:08 PM

my guess would be that it's actually an older wagoneer chassis. that or it's only the frame from a late 80's.

the 304 was never offered in the big jeeps. it could have been swapped in easily though. the only amc motors were 258/327/360/401. there was a buick 350 offered for a short time, but that's a pretty rare bird. if it is indeed a stock late 80's chassis, it's a 360 v8.

the front axle also does not appear to be from any 74-91 wagoneer. they all had internal style hubs, thought there were other changes. the ones on that truck are very clearly external hubs. which is what older dana 44's had, so it could be from a pre 74 fsj or something.

give us some more pics of the mechanicals and i can quit speculating and tell you what is what.

3/6/2008 11:43:44 PM

ill have some more pics shortly and verfiy the info from my bro

3/7/2008 12:17:10 AM

I am really curious to know more about it.
Miles on the engine? When was it rebuilt...if it was?
Miles since the tranny rebuilt or replaced?
Suspension?
How is the overall running condition?

3/7/2008 10:37:56 AM