User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » system imaging question Page [1]  
smoothcrim
Universal Magnetic!
18966 Posts
user info
edit post

So I need to keep an archive of machine images on physical media. DVD or dual layer DVD is the medium of choice at the moment. I need a way to backup these machines to this media such that only the media and no other disk is needed to recover the machine. My concerns are cost and speed. Speed is the most important (in terms of writing directly to disk and writing back to hard drive from disk). I was planning on using ghost, creating a .GHO image on an external hard drive, then burning the .GHO file to a dvd with ghost.exe on the disk and just burning the dvd with some form of bootable floppy emulation in nero or the like. Is there a slicker/faster solution?

4/16/2008 6:22:08 PM

Shaggy
All American
17820 Posts
user info
edit post

Acronis

4/16/2008 6:44:59 PM

ScHpEnXeL
Suspended
32613 Posts
user info
edit post

wow, so much information

4/16/2008 7:21:05 PM

damose
Veteran
409 Posts
user info
edit post

haha short and simple

4/17/2008 1:32:56 AM

darkone
(\/) (;,,,;) (\/)
11610 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ Read up on Acronis and you'll see that he said all that he needed to.

4/17/2008 1:43:48 AM

evan
All American
27701 Posts
user info
edit post

i'd go with acronis.

4/17/2008 1:45:32 AM

synapse
play so hard
60939 Posts
user info
edit post

acronis true image

4/17/2008 9:15:07 AM

smoothcrim
Universal Magnetic!
18966 Posts
user info
edit post

anyone care to point out the advantages over ghost? ghost is practically free (you can buy a $5 copy of systemworks 2004 and get ghost 2003)

4/17/2008 11:04:18 AM

quagmire02
All American
44225 Posts
user info
edit post

acronis is also practically "free", but you didn't hear that from me

4/17/2008 12:05:32 PM

synapse
play so hard
60939 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ but ghost pales in comparison to acronis true image, especially for the home user.
^ agreed, but i didnt say it either

4/17/2008 1:52:19 PM

smoothcrim
Universal Magnetic!
18966 Posts
user info
edit post

this will not be for home use, I need to do this to several hundred, possibly thousands of machines. I'm more looking for a time benchmark between the 2 and feature set secondarily.

4/18/2008 11:02:09 AM

evan
All American
27701 Posts
user info
edit post

in my experience at work:

for batch imaging jobs (as in, multicast), ghost seems to be faster. i actually like imagecast a little better though.

http://www.appdeploy.com/tools/detail.asp?id=95

ghost is faster than imagecast, but imagecast is much easier to manage/configure, especially for multicasts

for one-offs, i like acronis.

4/18/2008 12:14:17 PM

llama
All American
841 Posts
user info
edit post

ghost enterprise can burn images directly to CD/DVD

4/18/2008 1:11:37 PM

smoothcrim
Universal Magnetic!
18966 Posts
user info
edit post

my question with ghost, is do you need a bootdisk for these images or can ghost create a bootable restore dvd? if I didnt have to fuck with it and could just produce a restore dvd I would be ecstatic. all I'd need is a version of ghost that supported that as well as usb dual layer dvd support.

4/19/2008 12:50:43 AM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » system imaging question Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.