User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Explain this concept to me Page [1]  
Scuba Steve
All American
6931 Posts
user info
edit post

Awarding automatic citizenship to the children of foreign nationals or illegal immigrants born on "US soil"

6/22/2008 7:26:26 PM

JCASHFAN
All American
13916 Posts
user info
edit post

It made sense in 1776.

6/22/2008 7:34:27 PM

stowaway
All American
11770 Posts
user info
edit post

but the question is, does it make sense now?

6/22/2008 7:36:39 PM

JCASHFAN
All American
13916 Posts
user info
edit post

probably not, but that would take an Amendment to the Constitution.

6/22/2008 7:42:25 PM

Scuba Steve
All American
6931 Posts
user info
edit post

Which part of the constitution is the language contained in?

6/22/2008 7:52:11 PM

A Tanzarian
drip drip boom
10995 Posts
user info
edit post

The 14th amendment, ratified in 186?.

It was meant to ensure that freed slaves and their descendents were recognized as US citizens.

6/22/2008 8:00:20 PM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

whatever

who gives a shit about the Constitution, anyway?

6/22/2008 8:12:05 PM

JCASHFAN
All American
13916 Posts
user info
edit post

1868.

The only thing the constitution says in the original document (which was ratified in 1789) is that Congress can "establish a uniform rule of naturalization." So I double self-pwnt on that one.

6/22/2008 8:13:54 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

they need to make a new constitution...that shit from the 1700's just aint cutting it anymore

6/22/2008 8:16:14 PM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

if we wanted to change the Constitution, we could just change the one we have, since that's the way it's designed.

it's way easier to just ignore it, though

6/22/2008 8:17:15 PM

JCASHFAN
All American
13916 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ do tell, DNL, what your changes would entail.

6/22/2008 8:20:55 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

^^thats what i'm saying...seems like we could basically plagiarize it and make it up to date on todays standards

6/22/2008 8:25:50 PM

Scuba Steve
All American
6931 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"it's way easier to just ignore it, though"


well, we pretty much have in terms of civil liberties. perhaps the whole bearing arms thing will be next.

6/22/2008 8:29:33 PM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

i hope so

guns are bad and kill people

6/22/2008 8:31:10 PM

Wlfpk4Life
All American
5613 Posts
user info
edit post

drunknretarded strikes again!11!!

6/22/2008 8:32:25 PM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post

wlfpk4life contributes nothing to a thread but kneejerk personal attacks, as usual.\

suspend.

6/22/2008 8:40:46 PM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

^ And it's Sunday too, he probably was just at Church this morning.

6/22/2008 9:03:30 PM

Wlfpk4Life
All American
5613 Posts
user info
edit post

2 of the biggest flame baiters in the history of tdub complain about trolling.

It is to laugh.

6/22/2008 9:06:10 PM

Wlfpk4Life
All American
5613 Posts
user info
edit post

And anybody who thinks my response is trolling obviously has no respect for our constitution or its farsightedness with regards to the individual rights that it protects. Considering the 2 douches that posted after me probably use the bill of rights a toilet paper, I'm not shocked they wouldn't get it.

6/22/2008 9:07:50 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

i dont get why the dems dont use the constitution to show how fucked the republicans are

6/22/2008 9:15:15 PM

Wlfpk4Life
All American
5613 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah that whole right to bear arms and freedom of speech and religion are some fucked up ideals

oh I forgot...turrists have rights too11!!!!

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 9:19 PM. Reason : please, remember the terrorists]

6/22/2008 9:18:39 PM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

stop derailing the thread and mouthing off without even attempting to make a point in the debate.

6/22/2008 9:37:56 PM

bcsawyer
All American
4562 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ they don't want anybody to know that they ignore the constitution too. all of the federal lawmakers need to read the 10th amendment again. dangling carrots to make the states comply with federal demands in just a way to get around it.

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 9:40 PM. Reason : ...]

6/22/2008 9:40:29 PM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

yep. both sides are equally guilty. it's just a matter of which things they choose to be unconstitutional about.

6/22/2008 9:42:10 PM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
" Awarding automatic citizenship to the children of foreign nationals or illegal immigrants born on "US soil""


These kids will grow up knowing only American culture and ideals, why shouldn't they be Americans?

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 10:23 PM. Reason : ]

6/22/2008 10:23:30 PM

marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

well, they might be exposed to some other countries' culture, but they'll def speak english

6/22/2008 10:36:12 PM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

^ being exposed to another culture doesn't mean they won't by and large embrace American culture.

Hispanic culture is very similar to American culture anyway, but i've never met an immigrant that wasn't born here that did "act" American or know all the things an American would know.

6/22/2008 10:38:34 PM

Scuba Steve
All American
6931 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"These kids will grow up knowing only American culture and ideals, why shouldn't they be Americans?"


Well if their parents are illegal, shouldnt the point be that they need to return to their home country?

6/22/2008 10:41:04 PM

marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"i've never met an immigrant that wasn't born here"


aha neither have i?

do you mean never met a child born in america from immigrant parents?

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 10:43 PM. Reason : met not meant]

6/22/2008 10:43:30 PM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

^

yeah thats what i meant


Quote :
"Well if their parents are illegal, shouldnt the point be that they need to return to their home country?
"


They're here illegally, if they cared about this point, they would have returned.

Besides, if we changed legislation to disallow citizenry-by-birth, then it would also come off as a "grandfather clause" type of thing. Secondly, what problems will it solve? There's enough unenforced or poorly enforced anti-immigrant legislation on the books that could force immigrants back or prevent them from coming that we don't need to add yet another piece of legislation that will be ignored (because hospital workers aren't going to want to call INS on a new mother to damn her new cute little baby to a life or poverty vs. the potential to be attorney general).

On top of this all, the hispanic immigrants are helping to keep the gene pool here fresh, which we're going to need against the asians in the coming century.

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 10:51 PM. Reason : ]

6/22/2008 10:47:47 PM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post

we should turn illegals, and their children, into a renewable fuel source.

6/22/2008 11:11:55 PM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

^I think that anyone on welfare should have to spend 8 hours per day pedaling a stationary bike hooked up to a generator, until they get a job.

-getting a ROI for our tax dollars
-economic boost because people will be scrambling to find jobs that don't invole pedaling 8 hours/day
-put a dent in our energy problem
-fewer disgusting fatbodies

[Edited on June 22, 2008 at 11:15 PM. Reason : ^]

6/22/2008 11:15:22 PM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post


Private Pyle you are a disgusting fatbody!

and

Quote :
"people will be scrambling to find jobs that don't invole pedaling 8 hours/day"


I lol'd

6/22/2008 11:39:26 PM

HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

I agree this is bullshit and is an archaic practice from the 18th century. During the early days before mass cheap fast transit it had a legitimate purpose. However, in this day in time it is no longer needed and does more harm then good. For Christ sakes if the wife of douchebag president of Iran came over here pregnant during one of his official visits; if she gave birth the most outspoken critic of America; his son would be a US citizen.

Personally i do not care if jose wants to get $2/hr to build my fence. I do care though when Juanita can pop out 10 babies; who all now as american citizens can enjoy all the rights and benefits that the rest of us pay taxes for.



[Edited on June 23, 2008 at 12:09 AM. Reason : l]

6/23/2008 12:06:44 AM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Hispanic culture is very similar to American culture anyway, but i've never met an immigrant that wasn't born here that did "act" American or know all the things an American would know."


It takes a few generations. Poor immigrants generally live in ethnic enclaves where the old culture is still dominant. Personally, it wouldn't bother me as much if we had a tighter control on immigration.

A bigger beef that I have with immigration policy is the whole wet foot/dry foot nonsense.

6/23/2008 12:18:54 AM

sarijoul
All American
14208 Posts
user info
edit post

how many generations until a family can a real american child?

6/23/2008 12:21:00 AM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

A few. There isn't a set number.

In regards to the recent influx of hispanics, I'd say that it's going to be more dependent on the kids getting a good education and being able to have jobs not based on manual labor. Once they're able to move out of communities where spanish is still the primary language and latin culture is still dominant things should progress fine.

6/23/2008 12:30:55 AM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"HUR: Personally i do not care if jose wants to get $2/hr to build my fence. I do care though when Juanita can pop out 10 babies;"


how many times are you going to continue to parrot this shit. do you think it gets funnier and funnier, by the hundredth time you post this ignorant, self-righteous, racist crap?

6/23/2008 2:13:44 AM

Kurtis636
All American
14984 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I think that anyone on welfare should have to spend 8 hours per day pedaling a stationary bike hooked up to a generator, until they get a job.

-getting a ROI for our tax dollars
-economic boost because people will be scrambling to find jobs that don't invole pedaling 8 hours/day
-put a dent in our energy problem
-fewer disgusting fatbodies"


Quote :
"TOTALLY

AWESOME

IDEA"

6/23/2008 2:23:33 AM

theDuke866
All American
52839 Posts
user info
edit post

^^

6/23/2008 2:30:35 AM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"It takes a few generations."


Umm... no. In most places it takes 1 generation, and often less.

Quote :
"Poor immigrants generally live in ethnic enclaves where the old culture is still dominant. Personally, it wouldn't bother me as much if we had a tighter control on immigration."


This only applies to certain limited areas. Even in NC where we have tons of immigrants, you don't find too many of these enclaves that are isolated. And in any case, the kids grow up in normal schools, speaking English, making friends with Americans, and working with Americans. Just because their parents and maybe neighbors speak english doesn't mean they don't integrated with American culture.


-http://www.popcouncil.org/PDR_LinguisticLifeExpectancy.pdf

6/23/2008 2:32:11 AM

Dentaldamn
All American
9974 Posts
user info
edit post

well if it was as difficult to enter the country "legally" 100 years ago as it is now and you had to wait a few generations to gain citizenship if you were born here then I think I might be the first generation out of my moms family who's a citizen.

HURRAAYYYYYYY!!!!!!!

6/23/2008 8:53:57 AM

joe_schmoe
All American
18758 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Just because their parents and maybe neighbors speak english doesn't mean they don't integrated with American culture"


engrish much?

6/23/2008 12:19:55 PM

nutsmackr
All American
46641 Posts
user info
edit post

It's because we went with Ernest Renan's subjective nationality as opposed to Johann Fichte's objective nationality.

Why did we and continue to do this? Because subjective nationality is not based upon a racist precept the same way objective nationality.

What is after all American? We do not have a common culture or heritage. We are the mutts of the world. If we were to go with an objective nationality, what would it be? The objective nationality supported by the Klan, White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestants? Well, we just left out the native americans, the catholics, the jews.

I will still with Renan's definition of nationality and oppose the Fichte version.

6/23/2008 12:30:17 PM

eyedrb
All American
5853 Posts
user info
edit post

i too like the bicycle idea. We can use all the empty factory buildings.. Just fill it full of bikes and get to work.

6/23/2008 12:35:36 PM

CharlesHF
All American
5543 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I think that anyone on welfare should have to spend 8 hours per day pedaling a stationary bike hooked up to a generator, until they get a job.

-getting a ROI for our tax dollars
-economic boost because people will be scrambling to find jobs that don't invole pedaling 8 hours/day
-put a dent in our energy problem
-fewer disgusting fatbodies"

That's the funniest thing I've ever read.

6/23/2008 2:43:31 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » Explain this concept to me Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.