"I belong to a generation, one of the last generations, that was more or less bludgeoned to death with the history of philosophy... What got me through it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of ass-fuck or (it comes to the same thing) immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind and giving him a baby that would be his own offspring, yet monstrous."-Gilles Deleuze
10/11/2008 4:00:13 PM
uh-huh.
10/11/2008 4:01:03 PM
METRO
10/11/2008 4:01:06 PM
If you can't prove Goedel's incompleteness theorems you have no business calling yourself a philosopherpeace
10/11/2008 4:01:23 PM
I BELONG TO THE BLANK GENERATION
10/11/2008 4:01:58 PM
^^ that's exactly the kind of thought Deleuze is working against^ what the, Hell?
10/11/2008 4:03:15 PM
10/11/2008 4:03:50 PM
I'm gonna have to go with McDanger on this one.
10/11/2008 4:07:45 PM
why must, in your world, philosophers all handle arithmetic?Deleuze on philosophy:"...to go beyond the human condition: This is the meaning of philosophy, in so far as our condition condemns us to live among badly analyzed composites and to be badly analyzed composites ourselves."
10/11/2008 4:12:27 PM
wahhhh rigor in thought makes me whinylook at me i'm every french philosopher in the 20th century
10/11/2008 4:13:30 PM
GOD DAMMIT SON, STOP BEING METRO. THESE FUCKERS TRY TO FIGURE SHIT OUT BY THINKING TOO HARD INSTEAD OF ACTUALLY LOOKING AT REAL EVIDENCE SON.THEY JUST THINK UNTIL THEY SHIT BRICKS AND ACCOMPLISH NOTHING.
10/11/2008 4:14:41 PM
^ Deleuze was very much concerned with the material world and the forces that act within ithe was just advocating a philosophy which creates mobile concepts rather than eternal formsits not just linguistic masturbation - he was critical of the poststructuralists that used that approach^^ explain to me, as you would a child, how this aspect of the philosophy of mathematics is relevant to lived experience in the world - won't you have to rely on analogy?
10/11/2008 4:23:17 PM
10/11/2008 4:26:29 PM
but I'm not studying philosophyonly the philosophy of my fieldin your terms, how would you explain the concept of desire?compute desirecompute art[Edited on October 11, 2008 at 4:34 PM. Reason : -]
10/11/2008 4:32:16 PM
you talk like the past arguments about numbers are resolved and closedbut you are working in a system stemming from classical philosophy and morphing into the Christian obsession with the unity of the number one
10/11/2008 4:34:08 PM
last I checked, us Christians are "obsessed" with the number three
10/11/2008 4:35:17 PM
there is ONE God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, of all that is seen and unseen
10/11/2008 4:37:03 PM
10/11/2008 4:39:13 PM
rightbut that's an Abrahamic belief.Christianity is about the trinity.
10/11/2008 4:39:32 PM
10/11/2008 4:46:11 PM
what Deleuze is exploring is the possibility of new meaningyou might be receptive to this if your acute self-righteousness didn't trigger some sort of intellectual vaginismus inside your cunt of a brainfor Deleuze what is interesting lies in the milieu, the place where things mix and interacthe is not interested in the unending statement and restatement of primary principles or in declarations of their impossibility
10/11/2008 4:55:30 PM
10/11/2008 4:56:09 PM
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN TWO METROS ARGUE ABOUT WHO IS MORE METRO.
10/11/2008 4:57:52 PM
Saab your gimmick isn't funnyIhatespida did it way, way betterPack it in
10/11/2008 4:59:17 PM
LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION.ARE YOU REALLY SO STUPID THAT YOU THINK I DO THIS TO ENTERTAIN YOU? WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU THINK THAT I AM TRYING TO SEEM FUNNY TO YOU?
10/11/2008 5:01:14 PM
I'm not saying it's not funny to meit's objectively unfunny
10/11/2008 5:03:05 PM
^^ clearly you're seeking SOMEONE'S approval^ shit dude I didn't know you were from Rocky Mount[Edited on October 11, 2008 at 5:03 PM. Reason : -]
10/11/2008 5:03:23 PM
^ WHO IN THE FUCK'S APPROVAL AM I SEEKING SON? WHOSE APPROVAL ARE YOU SEEKING?^^ AGAIN, WHAT IN THE FUCK MAKES YOU THINK I'M TRYING TO SEEM FUNNY TO YOU SON?IN FACT, I'M HAVING A LOT OF TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING WHAT ABOUT ALL CAPS WOULD EVER BE INHERENTLY FUNNY. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMOR SON.[Edited on October 11, 2008 at 5:07 PM. Reason : ]
10/11/2008 5:06:15 PM
10/11/2008 5:07:51 PM
win[Edited on October 11, 2008 at 5:08 PM. Reason : .]
10/11/2008 5:08:34 PM
this thread sucked from beginning to end, and there was arguing involved. congrats guys, you all suck at this
10/11/2008 5:09:06 PM
10/11/2008 5:10:32 PM
I agree. Can we just go ahead and delete this thread and pretend it never happened? It sucks that hard.
10/11/2008 5:11:25 PM
10/11/2008 5:13:05 PM
did you go to HS in RM?which one?
10/11/2008 5:13:38 PM
no i went to HS in Raleigh
10/11/2008 5:18:58 PM
ah okay
10/11/2008 5:19:49 PM
Besides I only really tossed the insults in because this is chit chat and i felt obligatedNO HARD FEELINGS IN MATH DEBATE, YA HEARD
10/11/2008 5:21:41 PM
st0foolish sounds like mike tyson would if he had graduated high school. i use big words cause im smarter than you!
10/11/2008 5:22:01 PM
Mr Grace I could break down every single term and you still wouldn't understand
10/11/2008 5:23:57 PM
THAT'S HOW WE KNOW YOU'RE A METRO.
10/11/2008 5:25:10 PM
yes because i know things
10/11/2008 5:25:44 PM
Guess I'm metro.
10/11/2008 5:26:30 PM
I GAVE YOU YOUR NON-METRO CLEARANCE SON. YOU AREN'T METRO.
10/11/2008 5:28:10 PM
10/12/2008 8:16:18 AM
HOLY FUCKING SHIT THAT IS SOME METRO SHIT SON!
10/12/2008 10:33:32 AM