1/16/2009 2:27:10 AM
k
1/16/2009 2:34:49 AM
why do you and the rest of TWW care what some half retarded bitch posts anywayyou can find all the illiterate bitches you want up in Scotland County, they're probably twice as hot if you can deal with the fact that they can't add and their family tree is a sociological conundrum
1/16/2009 2:42:09 AM
dude, you went out with Kepjust sayn
1/16/2009 9:11:20 AM
Fiberous seems to have a ton of angst. Why?
1/16/2009 9:13:07 AM
if you'd ever actually conversed with jen, i think you'd find shes actually quite intelligentditzy or airheadish... yes, stupid... not by a long shot
1/16/2009 9:17:08 AM
hard to believe it's been over 2 years
1/16/2009 10:34:11 AM
twice as hot as jen?my dick is already hardI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 10:58:49 AM
1/16/2009 11:16:56 AM
1/16/2009 11:19:07 AM
all the jen threads i made are everything funny to meI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:19:14 AM
1/16/2009 11:19:35 AM
^ lol and your name now is getting close bets on it getting suspended the same way?
1/16/2009 11:21:08 AM
1/16/2009 11:21:23 AM
1/16/2009 11:22:35 AM
these are the best tww threadsI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:23:42 AM
gunzz is strollin on em
1/16/2009 11:24:56 AM
What I'm saying here is that I don't know Jen; that the Jen threads are all content-free post stalking, attention whoring, or turf marking that completely fails to characterize Jen; and that everything Jen herself posts sounds like it was written by an underprivileged inner city child that was most definitely left behind. It's pretty easy to see that even in the best case for TWW only so many dicks can fit in the bitch at one time. There is really no reason for this many Jen threads, to anyone who isn't trying to holler at that they fucking suck.Finally, I don't see how this has anything to do with Kep at all, nobody suggested she or anyone else is perfect.[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 11:33 AM. Reason : .]
1/16/2009 11:26:29 AM
lol. jen is not an attention whore.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:27:22 AM
i met jen once but she wasnt feelin me
1/16/2009 11:27:52 AM
she called me a BobbleHead and i dont even know what that means
1/16/2009 11:28:08 AM
lol BobbleHeadI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:28:39 AM
who is kep?
1/16/2009 11:28:54 AM
JOYCHICK3I'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:29:15 AM
1/16/2009 11:29:31 AM
^ no there's always a point
1/16/2009 11:30:04 AM
Jen is def very intelligent. I think being able to talk in depth about something and it not be all about yourself shows great intelligence. If you have not met her, you should. You will fall in love with her immediately. She is very magnetic.
1/16/2009 11:32:10 AM
1/16/2009 11:40:33 AM
really?you're going to bitch about jen threads and not about NCSUgirl83 threads?really?this isn't even really a jen thread. its just a x000 post thread.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:43:33 AM
I don't mind NCSUGirl83 as a meme so much, because she can spell and communicate herself coherently. Jen doesn't translate very well to TWW, because she's too ????? to type / spell, which is kind of fundamental to self-expression via textual medium. ????? doesn't necessarily have to be negative, but being the judgmental asshole that I am I will have to assume something negative for that variable. Also, the thing to note here is that Jen was OFFLINE when someone post- and online-status stalked her to discover the contents of this thread. The thread duplicates data that is already accessible in Jen's user profile for anyone who cares, and addresses someone who was already known to not be listening, effectively serving no purpose whatsoever. It wouldn't even still be at the top if I didn't start bitching in it, ironically...[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM. Reason : .]
1/16/2009 11:49:57 AM
I think jen has contributed tons more lulz and entertainment than ncsugirl83 will ever contribute.i mean come on dude.Frisby?Wayne's coating?thats classicI'm Big Business and i approved this message./]
1/16/2009 11:51:54 AM
Maybe gunzz can get his dick wet now that he played the ChitChat mod card like a champ.[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM. Reason : ]
1/16/2009 11:52:39 AM
I'm not a huge fan of either Jen- or NCSUGirl83-stalking threads, if that's unclear.
1/16/2009 11:54:22 AM
Ken
1/16/2009 11:55:14 AM
jessieJEPpI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 11:56:08 AM
Jen is worth every thread she gets about her. The girl is genuine. Thats much more than anyone can say for kep. Her not being able to spell isn't even an issue despite the fact that this is a text based medium given that her words are not so horribly spelled that you do not know what it is she was saying. Her sentences convey her point precisely despite spelling errors. If you wish to prove that what she says isn't coherent i think you'll have to actually provide some examples or elaborate more to support these claims. i think you said it best when you said.
1/16/2009 12:01:35 PM
You can't ALL put your dicks in her.
1/16/2009 12:06:39 PM
1/16/2009 12:06:57 PM
You'd have gotten my twat all mushy if I were a chick and you defended my honor that way.[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM. Reason : ^ It's not for lack of effort though. I know that part too.]
1/16/2009 12:07:45 PM
1/16/2009 12:09:44 PM
1/16/2009 12:14:17 PM
I don't think anyone on this website is trying to get with Jen.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.[Edited on January 16, 2009 at 12:18 PM. Reason : at least not by making threads about her]
1/16/2009 12:18:15 PM
classic"you mention someone or talk to someone or defend someone....so you're obviously trying to fuck."NO SIR....THERE'S NO FLAW IN THAT LOGIC!!!
1/16/2009 12:25:52 PM
yeah, you can just be friends with benefits.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 12:28:16 PM
Freud would certainly agree with me, at least
1/16/2009 12:28:18 PM
Then you would be wrongI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/16/2009 12:29:11 PM
haha, no, he wouldn't.that has nothing to do with Freud's theories.And even if t did, Frued has been discredited on 99% of his crap. No scientific basis, ya dig.
1/16/2009 12:31:01 PM
1/16/2009 12:37:32 PM
1/16/2009 12:43:39 PM
blah blah blahbeen reading wikipedia, eh?
1/16/2009 12:49:10 PM