through medicareor historyor jambandsbut thats it[/thread]
3/4/2009 10:26:30 AM
I'll pass. my prescription drug questions go to a pharmacist.
3/4/2009 10:27:10 AM
also i'd imagine you arent on medicareHENCE THE JOKE
3/4/2009 10:29:38 AM
When's P groove coming back around?
3/4/2009 10:30:38 AM
Beatrice Arthur tells better jokes.
3/4/2009 10:34:13 AM
Explosions.Yay or naeI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
3/4/2009 10:41:17 AM
I belong to a rapidly growing population of responsible adults that wish to self medicate 100% anonymously. What is the best way for us to attain a large and constant supply of a variety of prescription drugs, as needed, without having to disclose any personally identifiable information to anyone?For example:Private third-party anonymous age-verification services could supply us with tamper and fraud resistant legally-recognized age certificates or cards. Similarly, third-party identification proxy services could give us a legally-recognized randomly assigned or chosen id number, that we can change whenever we please. Activist physicians could meet with us anonymously, and we would pay with cash, and get prescriptions for our id number. Pharmacists could check our id numbers on our prescriptions to photo records openly-provided by the identification proxy services to ensure that only the intended individual gets the prescription. We could again pay in cash. The main problem with this is that getting a prescription is still required. Relying on the availability of drugs on the black market is too risky. Besides, many non-narcotic drugs are hardly available through the black market at all. Is there a better way to do this?[Edited on March 4, 2009 at 10:47 AM. Reason : ]
3/4/2009 10:46:27 AM
ok i didnt think id actually get questions, i was just kiddingbut p groove rocks hopefully soonexplosions rock hopefully soonwords
3/4/2009 10:49:09 AM
^^now that i have more time, ill answer in detailbasically thats impossible through medicare, the health industry is so skill specific and convoluted that you would have to have insiders in many different positions at multiple companiesk thats all the detail you get
3/4/2009 8:35:15 PM