LickHer All American 1580 Posts user info edit post |
http://laser-tv.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_video_display http://www.mitsubishi-tv.com/product/L65A90/
Anyone seen one of these in person? Know if anywhere local (wake co) has one on display? 9/3/2009 1:20:04 PM |
darkone (\/) (;,,,;) (\/) 11610 Posts user info edit post |
I've wanted to see one of those in person as well but I haven't seen them at any of the major TV retailers in Raleigh. 9/3/2009 1:22:18 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
according to the mitsubishi website, spencer is the closest city (100 miles)...kannapolis is the closest i've HEARD of (110 miles)
queen city audio, video, and appliance
according to wikipedia, laser tv's are "half the weight and cost of plasma displays"...does that mean that i can get a 42" (biggest i can have in my entertainment center) for $400?
[Edited on September 3, 2009 at 1:39 PM. Reason : .] 9/3/2009 1:37:38 PM |
BigMan157 no u 103354 Posts user info edit post |
maybe they meant energy consumption-wise
or maybe they're just wrong 9/3/2009 1:51:01 PM |
quagmire02 All American 44225 Posts user info edit post |
^ GTFO with your logic
and wikipedia CANNOT be wrong...i've written too many papers based on the idea that it is infallible! 9/3/2009 2:05:18 PM |
stopdropnrol All American 3908 Posts user info edit post |
from what i've heard they come pretty close to matching the pq of the pioneer kuro(generally considered best flat panel tv). I think they start at 65 inches or so. they do weigh considerably less than plasmas but that's no surprise glass and metal vs. all plastic. as fa as energy they are about the same as current generation plasmas since most plasma makers have made leaps and bounds in terms of power usage. these tvs are not cheap though the lowest price i've seen on the smallest one was about 5k which could buy you a pair of samsung 58" plasmas. all things considered i'd skip the laser tv and get a plasma. 9/3/2009 2:27:45 PM |
jchill2 All American 2683 Posts user info edit post |
I don't really think that decision would come up on tww 9/3/2009 3:13:40 PM |
Dumbass All American 3412 Posts user info edit post |
Didn't anybody ever tell them that you're not supposed to look into a coherent light source? <-- this guy learned the hard way 9/3/2009 6:11:32 PM |
Wolfman Tim All American 9654 Posts user info edit post |
9/3/2009 8:32:21 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "according to wikipedia, laser tv's are "half the weight and cost of plasma displays"...does that mean that i can get a 42" (biggest i can have in my entertainment center) for $400? " |
They are projection TVs and don’t necessarily compete directly with plasmas. They also aren’t going to have as good a viewing angle as a plasma.9/3/2009 9:46:19 PM |
SouthPaW12 All American 10141 Posts user info edit post |
I've seen these on numerous occasions at CEDIA and CES, and it's hands down the most gorgeous TV I've seen. Obviously I've seen everything Pioneer, LG, Samsung, Sony and the rest had to offer at these same shows, and Mitsu's Laser TV bested them all. Not even close.
They cost a fortune, but if you've got the coin you won't find a more beautiful picture. 9/4/2009 4:36:53 AM |