Hey fag, I'm going to go ahead and use your same stupid argument against you.

What moral right do you have to own property?

3/12/2010 5:46:54 PM

Quote :

"Ephesians 5:22-24 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Exodus 21:20-21 If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property. 1 Peter 2:13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men. 2:18 Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. Leviticus 25:44-45 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property."

3/12/2010 5:56:41 PM

immoral

tyranny

tyrannical

3/12/2010 5:58:10 PM

did you really need to be a douchebag and make this thread? no, not really

3/12/2010 6:09:49 PM

It was needed.

3/12/2010 6:10:09 PM

you forgot coercion and violence

3/12/2010 6:10:20 PM

The moral right of fuck bitches, get money.

3/12/2010 6:38:43 PM

The philosofag won't even man up and post here.

[Edited on March 12, 2010 at 6:47 PM. Reason : ]

3/12/2010 6:47:35 PM

In a state of nature, you can only achieve possession of material goods through the use of coercion and violence.

Fact.

[Edited on March 12, 2010 at 8:24 PM. Reason : ]

3/12/2010 8:17:48 PM

Additionally if we can only legitimately own the product of our own labor, then we cannot legitimately own anything, as our labor is worthless without capital.

3/12/2010 8:37:13 PM

Its not so much a moral right to own property as it is immoral for some to own much property while others own no property.

It sets up opportunities for exploitation which is whats immoral.

3/12/2010 9:00:29 PM

If you have to call someone a fag in the very first post, you've already lost.

3/12/2010 9:02:06 PM

good counterpoint

3/12/2010 9:05:36 PM

I'm pretty sure he directed this thread to ghotiblue, not me, and I don't have time right now to make a legitimate counterpoint. You shouldn't have to resort to name calling if you actually have a strong argument.

3/12/2010 9:13:23 PM

good counterpoint

3/12/2010 9:15:24 PM

Quote :

"If you have to call someone a fag in the very first post, you've already lost."

fuck u fag

3/12/2010 9:40:00 PM

Quote :

"Among all of the absurdities that man reveres, this is one of the greatest and one of the most revered. The right of property is ancient, as ancient as man's stupidity and blindness; but just the antiquity of a right can not give it the "right" to survive. If it is an absurd right, it is necessary to abolish it without giving importance to its birth at the time when man covered his nakedness with the animal skins. "

http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/magon/works/regen/derecho.html

3/13/2010 8:45:05 AM