evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118853726/abstract Giles G G, Severi G, English D R. Sexual factors and prostate cancer, The British Journal of Urology International 2003; 92 (3): 211-216.
Quote : | "Table 2 shows that those 'never married' had almost half the risk of the 'ever married' (P = 0.05), but there was no evidence that the total number of female sexual partners was associated with risk (P = 0.8). Men with a history of male sex partners had about two-thirds the risk (P = 0.2) but this was based on few men (2.5% of controls)." |
Quote : | "Greater ejaculatory frequency in the most sexually active year in each of the three decades was associated with a significantly lower risk, with men in the upper quartile of ejaculatory frequency having about two-thirds the risk of those in the lower quartile for the third and fourth decade, and four-fifths the risk for the fifth. Ejaculatory frequencies in each of the decades were correlated with one another (r = 0.5–0.7). A similar finding related to the total number of ejaculations over the three decades. Those who reported an average of four to five or more ejaculations per week had two-thirds the risk compared with those who, on average, ejaculated less than three times per week." | ]7/8/2010 5:27:37 AM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
So you don't have to click to find out what this is talking about:
Quote : | "Sexual factors and prostate cancer
OBJECTIVE To assess whether prostate cancer might be related to hormone levels and, by inference, to differences in sexual activity.
PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS In a case-control study of men with prostate cancer aged < 70 years at diagnosis and age-matched control subjects, information was collected on two aspects of sexual activity; the number of sexual partners and the frequency of total ejaculations during the third to fifth decades of life.
RESULTS There was no association of prostate cancer with the number of sexual partners or with the maximum number of ejaculations in 24 h. There was a negative trend (P < 0.01) for the association between risk and number of ejaculations in the third decade, independent of those in the fourth or fifth. Men who averaged five or more ejaculations weekly in their 20s had an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.66 (0.49–0.87) compared with those who ejaculated less often.
CONCLUSIONS The null association with the number of sexual partners argues against infection as a cause of prostate cancer in this population. Ejaculatory frequency, especially in early adult life, is negatively associated with the risk of prostate cancer, and thus the molecular biological consequences of suppressed or diminished ejaculation are worthy of further research." |
[Edited on July 8, 2010 at 5:33 AM. Reason : sweet! porn is healthy]7/8/2010 5:31:32 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
haha, that's why i highlighted the bold parts in my post 7/8/2010 5:34:48 AM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
Well it was more so the objective of the study that was missing originally.
Anyway, looks good for me guess we have a quota now to "reach" with our s.o's 7/8/2010 5:42:13 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
exactly
i think of it as a goal 7/8/2010 5:45:47 AM |
petejames All American 2236 Posts user info edit post |
DAMMIT WOMAN! DO YOU WANT ME TO GET PROSTATE CANCER? 7/8/2010 5:48:18 AM |
Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
7/8/2010 7:24:36 AM |
Nighthawk All American 19619 Posts user info edit post |
Well good to know that I've been practicing good prostate health over the past decade. 7/8/2010 7:32:48 AM |
kiljadn All American 44689 Posts user info edit post |
I'm glad that this study was undertaken. 7/8/2010 8:12:07 AM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
"Okay, for this study, we need you to ejaculate as many times a day as you can." 7/8/2010 8:14:21 AM |
ALkatraz All American 11299 Posts user info edit post |
"Okay, for this study, we need you to ejaculate as many times a day as you can. OK, Go! Go! Go!"
[Edited on July 8, 2010 at 8:40 AM. Reason : -] 7/8/2010 8:40:34 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
to the top
i just finished extending my lifespan 7/16/2010 11:31:21 PM |
Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
"I'll choose 'Things we didn't need to know' for $200, Alex." 7/16/2010 11:32:50 PM |
LeonIsPro All American 5021 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "GREATER
EJACULATORY
FREQUENCY" |
7/16/2010 11:34:13 PM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
^^you know you liked it, don't lie.] 7/16/2010 11:38:05 PM |
merbig Suspended 13178 Posts user info edit post |
Man. I'm glad I don't have anything to worry about. 7/16/2010 11:44:46 PM |
Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
he's been fapping furiously for the past 2 hours... 7/16/2010 11:49:26 PM |
MrsCake All American 1146 Posts user info edit post |
Evaaaaaan...tmi darling, also, are you still at work? 7/16/2010 11:49:27 PM |
GeniuSxBoY Suspended 16786 Posts user info edit post |
He didn't tell us which TWW user he was fapping to 7/16/2010 11:52:02 PM |
Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
obviously, it was God 7/16/2010 11:53:12 PM |
GeniuSxBoY Suspended 16786 Posts user info edit post |
Really!? I could have sworn it was Merbig... half man, half mermaid, half big 7/16/2010 11:55:55 PM |
Optimum All American 13716 Posts user info edit post |
i like to refer to him as little fish 7/16/2010 11:57:07 PM |