I had intended to bring this back, as it is surely harder now than all those years ago when it was a marginally gratifying way to waste your time. I thought it only good form that I would kick it off with one of my own but after an hour of 2- or 0-result queries, or 1-result that was only a word list, I have decided to throw in the towel and pass the torch to someone even more willing to waste time.

Have at it


(in case you missed that train http://www.googlewhack.com/rules.htm)

[Edited on July 10, 2010 at 3:06 AM. Reason : link]

7/10/2010 3:02:16 AM

Quote :

"Verify Your Googlewhack! ATTENTION: Whack is NOT working. It can't, until Google settles down. Don't bother trying it. Seriously. Don't complain about it. Seriously. It may be fixed in July. Seriously. But don't count on it. Seriously. "

Quote :

"As of noon 13 Feb 2010, Google offers a new set of definition links, from a new source. There may be new Whackfactors... D'oh! Definitions again are being offered only for SINGLE words. Pursuing a workaround this week; stay tuned... "

It has issues.

7/10/2010 3:44:28 AM

this looks stupid...

i could always invent a few character strings of random characters, post it to my website and wait until the googlebot hits the stats.

7/10/2010 4:07:27 AM

GENIUS! and you could throw a football a million miles if you were in space or never lose a card game if you had cameras implanted into the eyes of all your opponents!

7/10/2010 5:30:17 AM

hahah fermat

^^you're missing the point, and clearly didn't read the rules

i'm not worried about it being "submitted for approval"




we'll do our own peer review...just find one

[Edited on July 10, 2010 at 2:36 PM. Reason : asdf]

7/10/2010 2:36:19 PM

i miss doing this.

7/11/2010 7:12:56 PM

what a waste of reading time

7/11/2010 7:24:40 PM

As soon as this page is indexed by google "tintinnabulary pierogi" will no longer be a google whack.

7/11/2010 8:18:06 PM