Anyone have any doubt this will actually cause more deaths than any other form of terrorist attacks we have ever seen?
9/27/2010 3:41:17 PM
cyberterrorism seems to be more popular (and easier) as an economic weaponbut it's not unreasonable to think that a massive outage of computer systems, esp. systems that rely on the internet could result in large scale deaths
9/27/2010 3:44:38 PM
took down an airliner....http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-09-27/stuxnet-and-the-year-of-geek-terror/
9/27/2010 3:45:56 PM
Especially if they do one of those "fire sales" Justin Long keeps talking about.
9/27/2010 4:32:42 PM
9/27/2010 4:39:11 PM
brbhacking gibsons
9/27/2010 4:47:23 PM
it's not hacking if it's not over the internet you guys
9/27/2010 4:56:59 PM
Well of course things like the Iranian nuke system and airline controls aren't connected to the internet...but they are connected to each other. So once something gets on one of those computers, it doesn't matter because it's there. So yes, it was transferred via a USB port just like how the Iranian virus got into their system.Yes, terrorists are terrorists but like ken said, it's a lot more economical to kill people this way. Logistically it's a million times simpler.
9/27/2010 5:23:47 PM
Picking the lock to a server rack is also considered hacking.
9/27/2010 6:26:45 PM
cybersecurity and manufacturing process control networks is a rather interesting beast.[Edited on September 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM. Reason : nm]
9/27/2010 10:46:42 PM
I would result in the death of lots of WoW users and forum trolls.
9/28/2010 1:13:55 PM
9/28/2010 9:22:56 PM
So I've been told...there is a story about said subject on the McNiel/Leher newshour tonight. 6pm.
10/1/2010 5:27:14 PM
10/1/2010 8:28:16 PM
^you're right. I read his post incorrectly. Sorry
10/2/2010 2:03:07 AM