User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » "Democrat party credibility watch" Thread? Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7], Prev  
JCE2011
All American
5367 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"What would have to happen for you to

A. leave the party?
B. Vote against a democratic candidate?"


This is a good hypothetical, but the leftists of 2017 don't like questions like this because they have zero principals so they pretty much just go with whatever the media/hollywood/celebrities tell them, and accept whatever the "victim narrative" is without thinking for themselves.

It isn't about whether or not you agree with the action, its about who did the action because all of you are brainless hacks that can't see through the media's bias.

5/6/2017 10:26:51 PM

tulsigabbard
Veteran
171 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Does the Iran-Contra Affair, Jack Abramoff, and Donald Trump, respectively, have any impact on you?"

So you're ok with all of this stuff because "republicans do it too!"? Thats exactly what I mean by "standing for nothing".



Quote :
"From my understanding, the only requiremnet is that they are less liberal than the DNC candidate. An extreme hypothetical is if someone just like Trump ran as a single-payer-loving conservative against someone like Clinton.


Honest question: how old are you?"

So now you see the problem with the "two party" system? I'm 30.

Also this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_X__bmdIek

5/7/2017 2:46:28 PM

rjrumfel
All American
19439 Posts
user info
edit post

Sooo I'm hearing rumblings in conservative circles that the DNC hacks were not actually Russian hacks but actually leaks by a DNC insider. That DNC insider was found shot in the back last July. Sounds like they found evidence on his computer(s) of collusion with Wikileaks and trails that he sent them emails.

I wonder if there is any truth to this. His name was Seth Rich.

5/17/2017 9:21:42 AM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
47114 Posts
user info
edit post

Oh, FFS.

You're trolling now, right?

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html

[Edited on May 17, 2017 at 9:28 AM. Reason : X]

5/17/2017 9:27:07 AM

rjrumfel
All American
19439 Posts
user info
edit post

People have called me lots of things around here, but a troll usually isn't one of them. No, I wasn't trolling, but I did hear about it.

Thank you for the link - I didn't see that this morning when I was perusing CNN. I'll put it to bed now.

5/17/2017 9:32:54 AM

Cherokee
All American
6361 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^Not attacking you at all, but I have a few friends who have spent the last two years telling me about all the things they hear from their contacts in DC and nearly every single thing I've ever heard was wrong.

I even have personal experience - I used to work for a US Senator and during the McCain race we got "inside information" that his VP pick was going to be person A and it almost immediately turned out to be Sarah Palin (not person A).

In any event, the Seth Rich thing is highly unlikely (but not zero % chance) connected in any with Wikileaks and everything that's happened since.

[Edited on May 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM. Reason : a]

5/17/2017 10:04:56 AM

MONGO
Veteran
350 Posts
user info
edit post

^ was it Joe Lieberman? I remember hearing he landed on Palin in a panic after it was leaked that he was going to pick Lieberman.

5/17/2017 11:22:46 AM

Cherokee
All American
6361 Posts
user info
edit post

I can't remember honestly, though I want to say we were told Romney.

5/17/2017 1:54:50 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
47114 Posts
user info
edit post

https://twitter.com/bfouhy/status/865978102114942976

This is why Bernie is so crucial to the Democrats. This is the message that needs to be sold.

The Russia stuff is important but it is NOT a message to build a platform on.

5/20/2017 2:50:47 PM

tulsigabbard
Veteran
171 Posts
user info
edit post

I wonder what they are saying. I hope they aren't saying ACA is great.

5/21/2017 2:01:26 PM

tulsigabbard
Veteran
171 Posts
user info
edit post

I guess We'll just have to take DWS word for it
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-a-dubious-russian-document-influenced-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-probe/2017/05/24/f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.8ed6e262ddd0

5/24/2017 7:47:32 PM

NyM410
J-E-T-S
47114 Posts
user info
edit post

As trustworthy as the Steele dossier. That's to say not very.

5/26/2017 9:58:02 AM

thegoodlife3
All American
32638 Posts
user info
edit post

did the Post publish that?

5/26/2017 10:56:41 AM

dtownral
All American
19904 Posts
user info
edit post

there has actually been quite a bit of the steele dossier that has now been corroborated

5/26/2017 12:38:04 PM

Cherokee
All American
6361 Posts
user info
edit post

^

and further news:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/335244-official-trump-looking-at-future-of-us-sanctions-on-russia

5/26/2017 12:58:23 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » "Democrat party credibility watch" Thread? Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2017 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.37 - our disclaimer.