http://uk.news.yahoo.com/jewish-court-sentences-dog-death-stoning-170029405.html
+1 Jews

sharia what?

6/19/2011 12:08:23 PM

is this real? the article was so absurd i can't stop laughing

i feel kinda bad

6/19/2011 12:13:45 PM

6/19/2011 12:17:29 PM

If this is real, what I find funny is that if a dog can go to court for a trial that means it has the same rights as a human in that country. Interesting.

6/19/2011 12:19:06 PM

How the hell did the dog get into court in the first place

6/19/2011 12:19:32 PM

^ With a leash.

6/19/2011 12:20:49 PM

/rimshot

6/19/2011 12:21:40 PM

Quote :

"Clearly still offended, one of the judges sentenced the animal to death by stoning by local children."

This can't be real.

6/19/2011 12:21:53 PM

How does a dog smell?

With its nose

6/19/2011 12:21:59 PM

i feel bad for the children haha

i wouldn't want to stone a dog to death that is so traumatizing.

6/19/2011 12:27:48 PM

The children couldn't have been very good at the task since it ran away.

6/19/2011 12:37:53 PM

I'll bet the judge saw the Jew dog eat pork.

6/19/2011 12:38:17 PM

PAUSE

how does a dog get a religion?

6/19/2011 12:39:42 PM

Be a Jew or die?

6/19/2011 12:45:35 PM

Hitler Vindicated ITT

6/19/2011 12:47:12 PM

the dog is allegedly a former lawyer that was cursed to death and reincarnation into the body of a lowly animal(dog). The lawyer has recently returned to the courtroom as a dog in an effort to mock the judges. (twenty years later)

6/19/2011 1:29:18 PM

religion is so fucking stupid

embarrassing

6/19/2011 2:10:37 PM

^^ Oh. That makes total sense.

6/19/2011 2:14:38 PM

Quote :

"Be a Jew or die? "

That’s the problem with religious theocracies. Israel needs to get out of the dark ages and embrace a real secular government.

6/19/2011 4:40:07 PM

yet again concrete proof of religion=stupid

6/19/2011 5:49:48 PM

so now there is denial it ever happened.

anyway, here is a verified jewish extremist action, and they apologized for it as well. from last month:

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/09/religious-paper-cuts-clinton-from-iconic-photo

Religious paper apologizes for erasing Clinton from iconic photo

Quote :

"(CNN) – Faith has outweighed fact at Di Tzeitung, a Hasidic newspaper based in Brooklyn, New York. The ultra-Orthodox Jewish publication ran a doctored copy of the iconic “Situation Room Photo” last Friday – you know, the one taken of President Barack Obama and his national security team during the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound. Scrubbed from the picture: the two women in the room. It’s as if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, with her hand clasped over her mouth, and Audrey Tomason, director of counterterrorism, weren’t there and weren’t part of history. The newspaper later apologized for violating White House instructions against altering photos. "We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department," the newspaper said in a statement Monday. The news of this broke Friday when Shmarya Rosenberg, 52, posted a quick piece on his blog Failed Messiah. Rosenberg, of St. Paul, Minnesota, said he wasn't surprised by the photo doctoring and only posted something about it because "it was a slow news day." A former ultra-Orthodox Jew, Rosenberg has been writing about the ultra-Orthodox community - mostly about crime and what he dubbed "strange media" - for seven years. He said the newspapers in that community have become "increasingly strange with their censorship of women's faces and women's bodies" over the past few years. He said readers of the Yiddish-language paper used to see photos of rabbis with their wives and that there was then a time when the women were blurred. Now, they're just not there. But in a written statement issued Monday afternoon by Di Tzeitung, the newspaper said that its decision to leave women out of photos is religiously mandated and that the right to do so is protected by the U.S. Constitution. "The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. That has precedence even to our cherished freedom of the press," the statement said. "Publishing a newspaper is a big responsibility, and our policies are guided by a Rabbinical Board. "Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging women, which is certainly never our intention," it continued. "We apologize if this was seen as offensive.""

6/22/2011 6:06:30 PM

Oy vey

6/22/2011 6:48:07 PM

When I click the link in the OP, I get brought to a list of links, only two of which reference this article (following a "link not found" message).

One is a somethingawful thread entitled, "Rabbinical court didn't sentence dog to death by stoning"

The other link has a series of links ending in this one:

http://www.thejc.com/news/israel-news/50487/no-dog-stoned-death-jerusalem-court

Good job, guys.

[Edited on June 22, 2011 at 7:22 PM. Reason : Easiest to call things stupid when you make shit up about them.]

6/22/2011 7:22:12 PM

^ see my post.

6/22/2011 7:25:49 PM