http://youtu.be/WY4qsri-Af0

Yep. If you thought he actually had some before, here's proof that he doesn't.

Quote :

"Holder: The email that you just read, now this is important, that email referred to Wide Receiver. It did not refer to Fast and Furious. That has to be noted for the record. Chaffetz: No, it doesn't. It says Fast and Furious. 'Do you think we should try to have Lanny participate in press when Fast and Furious and Laura's Tucson case are unsealed?' It's specific to Fast and Furious. That is not true, Mr. Attorney General. I'm happy to share it with you. Holder: The Laura Tucson case refers to Wide Receiver -- Chaffetz: It says Fast and Furious. We'll let the media have it and it'll play out there. Holder: Laura Duffy was not involved -- Laura was not involved in Fast and Furious. Chaffetz: The email says 'Fast and Furious,' you say it doesn't I've got it in black and white. Holder: I've got superior knowledge."

Pls to embed. I'm sure pryderi will for me.

6/7/2012 7:47:33 PM

What in the fuck is this even about?

6/7/2012 8:49:06 PM

Another informed citizen.

Let me guess, you are voting for Obama?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal

6/8/2012 6:36:40 AM

This whole thing is just amazing and it seems that most people don't care that this administration would purposefully allow illegal guns sales to take place, let the firearms be transported, let the firearms be taken to Mexico, and let people die from this. And on top of that, lie about every part of this operation, when gun dealers, field agents, and others have already blown the whistle.

It's sickening.

Someone shop Holder's face:



Onto this:

6/8/2012 7:55:42 AM

As strongly as I feel about the AG, the problem didn't start in this Admin.

But we simply CANNOT allow the Attorney General--the chief law enforcement officer for the country--to lie when called to Congress to address these issues!

6/8/2012 9:49:24 AM

Quote :

"Another informed citizen."

haha, is everyone supposed to know what this is about? Do you watch C-Span 24/7?

6/8/2012 10:07:30 AM

I'm glad that I'm not the only one that has noticed that the Attorney Generals in recent years have become the chief PR spin guy. Maybe it's always been that way.

6/8/2012 10:29:42 AM

Ohhh yeah that "scandal" that Fox, Beck, and Hannity have been trying to turn into a big deal for almost three years straight now. Good luck with that.

Quote :

"haha, is everyone supposed to know what this is about? Do you watch C-Span 24/7?"

Lmao trust me this is not something they waste time with on C-SPAN

[Edited on June 8, 2012 at 10:48 AM. Reason : .]

6/8/2012 10:47:20 AM

true...it'll never go anywhere

6/21/2012 12:29:10 AM

Quote :

"What in the fuck is this even about?"

ahahaha, oh my God.

and to think that people like you and that condescending moron str8foolish talk down the "knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing" conservatives and republicans for being naive and uninformed.

Quote :

"Ohhh yeah that "scandal" that Fox, Beck, and Hannity have been trying to turn into a big deal for almost three years straight now."

yeah you keep pretending that its not a big deal, in light of obamas recent stonewalling, and watch it explode in your stupid faces before november. keep pretending that fox is the only one portraying it as a big deal, i mean, the only reason you even mention fox at at all is because its another idiotic liberal fallback just like "george bush."

to be so intellectually gifted and superior your vocabularies are incredibly small, but let the broken record keep skipping; all youre doing is empowering "idiotic" conservatives to wipe the floor with you shortly.

i need to go to the DNC in a bush/cheney t-shirt with a video camera and see if i can capture some folks like you on camera in your element.

mighty morphin college rangers GO.



[Edited on June 21, 2012 at 1:14 PM. Reason : -]

6/21/2012 1:09:05 PM

you are such a hack, it's not even worth trying to address what your "arguments"

6/21/2012 1:12:35 PM

Quote :

"you are such a hack, it's not even worth trying to address what your "arguments""

youre such an idiot, im not even going to try and figure out what youre saying.

6/21/2012 1:15:16 PM

its' not that hard, smart guy, but since you can't figure it out:

i was going to say "...address what you're saying", but then I meant to change it to "address your arguments".

and "idiot"? what's with the name-calling? i thought only liberals resorted to that when they couldn't defend their claims.

6/21/2012 1:19:48 PM

no, as i mentioned, when liberals cant defend their claims they resort to saying "fox" or "george bush."

6/21/2012 1:30:48 PM

Where are the jobs, Darrel Issa?

6/21/2012 1:31:01 PM

A family is devastated while Holder and Obama snicker in the corner about their masterplan and cover up.

6/21/2012 1:32:01 PM

^^^so it's conservatives that resort to calling people "idiots"?

[Edited on June 21, 2012 at 1:32 PM. Reason : ]

6/21/2012 1:32:36 PM

Quote :

"The White House may invoke the latter to apply to executive branch officials outside of the president's inner circle, as long as they were involved with the government's decision-making process. Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush all asserted executive privilege in matters not involving presidential communications. And Bush Administration Attorney General Michael Mukasey invoked the same "deliberative process privilege" as recently as 2008, rejecting congressional subpoenas for reports of Department of Justice interviews with the White House staff regarding the Valerie Plame Wilson identify leak investigation."

http://tinyurl.com/7hnn3nu

6/21/2012 1:34:01 PM

^^not necessarily, but ill call a spade a spade if i have to, and the liberals on the board are mostly idiots.

^so you want your golden boy to take that road? you want him to have his valerie plume moment? i thought liberals were beyond this type of thing? does that mean the next president can point at obamas shitty behavior as an excuse the way obama points to bush?

i just want to make sure we sift out any hypocrisy before we continue further.

6/21/2012 1:45:55 PM

I like how he immediately resorted to implying I'm an idiot without even answering my simple question. Because I don't care about some non-scandal that the right-wing media is trying to drum up in an election year?

6/21/2012 1:47:03 PM

sigh.

youre an idiot by implying its a non-scandal, that was my point.

you watched colberts segment and now you think its funny to chum around with like-minded fools here in TSB about it.

thats sad and you know it.

[Edited on June 21, 2012 at 2:07 PM. Reason : -]

6/21/2012 1:57:10 PM

Quote :

"and the liberals on the board are mostly idiots."

you really should calm down on the name-calling. the more you do it, and the more you don't address simple questions, and the more you continue to claim that obama is such a terrible president because of this or that, but ignore the fact that previous presidents did the exact same thing... the more and more you come across as a total hack not worth paying attention to.

6/21/2012 2:12:32 PM

Quote :

"What in the fuck is this even about?"

is this the supremely mature and simple question youd like answered?

it was, with a wikipedia link of all things.

6/21/2012 2:19:41 PM

Actually, I don't watch Colbert and I rarely catch Stewart.

Oh, you're right though. This is totally worse than anything that every president since Truman has done.

6/21/2012 2:39:03 PM

As with most things it's not the crime or bad decision making, it's the cover up. Fast and furious seems like a poorly conceived operation but the denials and cover up is worse.

6/21/2012 3:08:34 PM

^^sarcasm is the recourse of a weak mind.

feel free to keep playing though!

after bullet took my initial bait with the grammatical prowess of an 8 year old you guys have made much progress in destroying whatever reputation for intelligence you might have had.

...but in all seriousness, let obama have his nixon "what did the president know when" moment and call it no big deal.

catastrophe posing as mediocrity is, after all, this presidents trademark.

[Edited on June 21, 2012 at 3:09 PM. Reason : -]

6/21/2012 3:09:26 PM

Quote :

"^^sarcasm is the recourse of a weak mind."

that's hilarious, seeing as how you used sarcasm in your post immediately above that one.

dude, you're a joke, accept it.

6/21/2012 3:13:27 PM

not really, you told me to "address a simple question" and i was clarifying which one.

dont be an ass.

6/21/2012 3:16:04 PM

Quote :

"dont be an ass."

that's pretty hilarious, since you do that on a consistent basis.

6/21/2012 3:23:37 PM

talk about a trainwreck:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-spokesman-executive-privilege-entirely-about-principle_647707.html

6/21/2012 3:54:22 PM

http://www.scribd.com/doc/79930290/%E2%80%9CFatally-Flawed-Five-Years-of-Gunwalking-in-Arizona-%E2%80%9D

6/21/2012 6:26:48 PM

Quote :

"i need to go to the DNC in a bush/cheney t-shirt with a video camera and see if i can capture some folks like you on camera in your element."

better not do that, unless you want to visit Carolinas Medical Center

6/21/2012 7:48:24 PM

but liberals are pacifists?

6/21/2012 8:05:24 PM

nope, all liberals are violence-loving meatheads. better watch out for them liberals, they'll put a hurting on you!

[Edited on June 21, 2012 at 8:12 PM. Reason : but not with guns, they hate guns]

6/21/2012 8:12:22 PM