User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » NCGA "environmental reform" bill Page [1]  
eyewall41
All American
2262 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.wral.com/senate-oks-one-size-fits-all-environmental-reform/12400363/

The state Senate Wednesday tentatively approved Senate Bill 612, which would ban any local environmental rules more stringent than state or federal law.


Why is this important? It essentially is the groundwork to prevent any local town or county from restricting or banning fracking when that hammer drops following passage of SB 76 (the bill to allow fracking in 2 years). It will also allow the state full control so they can roll back other important local regulations.

5/2/2013 10:11:41 AM

wdprice3
BinaryBuffonary
45912 Posts
user info
edit post

we can't have local communities taking additional steps to improve the environment, that's just madness!

think of the children, won't you?

5/2/2013 10:13:49 AM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm not a fan of the intention of this bill, but speaking as someone in the Environmental field, if there was another layer of regulation some things would really be a pain. It's already enough of a headache when you get in jurisdiction fights between NCDENR and EPA Region 4, I would hate to also have to get approval from a city or county.

5/2/2013 10:33:45 AM

ScubaSteve
All American
5523 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Wait, so the people always clamoring for "states rights" because their theory is locals know better and there are no one size fits all solutions now say locals know nothing and they have a cookie cutter solution for an entire state so don't bother yourself with your immediate surroundings???
"


From WRAL comments

5/2/2013 10:41:32 AM

darkone
(\/) (;,,,;) (\/)
11610 Posts
user info
edit post

^ That's atypically cogent for WRAL article comments.

5/2/2013 11:39:33 AM

NeuseRvrRat
hello Mr. NSA!
35376 Posts
user info
edit post

the problem will take care of itself. for every county or municipality that enacts strict environmental policy, there will be several that don't. the ones with strict laws will miss out on the tax revenue.

5/2/2013 11:40:54 AM

ScubaSteve
All American
5523 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ I know, I was surprised...

5/2/2013 12:04:08 PM

TerdFerguson
All American
6600 Posts
user info
edit post

The fact is, its actually pretty rare to find local environmental rules that are more strict than the State. To enact an environmental rule you usually need to have some science supporting your position (at least if you don't want it constantly challenged) and most local governments just don't have the resources to do that (maybe bigger cities). The exception would be instances where there are just blatant safety issues at play and likely have a history of being a problem in the county (they mention the flooding problem in Camden County, some counties have more strict septic system requirements, etc).

What is much more worrisome is the repealing/rewriting of all state laws that are more strict than federal laws. We have some unique problems in NC that federal rules are lacking in. Specifically in the non-point pollution realm. This bill would really turn the clock back on all the advances our state has made (usually these rules are established by the state, not local communities).

I actually think this bill is targeted and was likely pushed by developers. They want to be able to move across the state and drop their cookie cutter developments with the exact same houses and exact same stormwater/erosion/septic system plans wherever they can find a deal on land. Recycling their master plans would save them a lot of money. I actually think developers are a major lobby for all the bills that the NCGA has considered that usurp local control, there have been quite a few. If you get a chance surf over to the ncleg.gov website and see how many representatives, especially from rural counties, are in real estate/development. Hint: its a lot.

What we also need to consider is the vacuum of rules and uncertainty that these types of sweeping bills create. For people that have been in business for a while this could actually end up being a headache. They are going to have to relearn some things, how is implementation different, where are the grey areas, what can I get away with, and how long until we realize how dumb this is and slowly start re-instituting the old rules? This may not be as business friendly as it first seems.

5/2/2013 12:32:52 PM

Str8Foolish
All American
4852 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"for every county or municipality that enacts strict environmental policy, there will be several that don't."


Knowing NC, there will also be a handful who will institute "Mandatory Tire-Burning Days"

5/2/2013 1:14:13 PM

Bullet
All American
28417 Posts
user info
edit post

The bill also does away with Riparian Buffer Rules in the entire Neuse and Tar-Pam basins. Developers and landowners will be able to clear-cut all the way down to the water, even on land that has been forested for decades.

(this General Assembly is truly insane)

[Edited on May 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM. Reason : ]

5/2/2013 2:16:53 PM

wdprice3
BinaryBuffonary
45912 Posts
user info
edit post

5/2/2013 2:17:56 PM

HockeyRoman
All American
11811 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't even know where to begin...

5/2/2013 2:50:58 PM

IMStoned420
All American
15485 Posts
user info
edit post

I wish I had a fucking time machine so I could show all the dumbasses who voted for these douchebags what was going to happen.

Oh wait, it's called Louisiana.

5/2/2013 4:01:47 PM

Supplanter
supple anteater
21831 Posts
user info
edit post

^I've been hearing stuff like that a lot, that we're moving towards the environmental standards of Louisiana, the educational standards of Mississippi, and social attitudes of Alabama. Instead of investing in the future of our state, we're in a race to the bottom, because it's lining the pockets of our legislators.

5/2/2013 4:47:38 PM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

Small government= pro corporation

5/2/2013 8:03:42 PM

HockeyRoman
All American
11811 Posts
user info
edit post

Trees and wildlife can't help funnel money into the Art Pope empire, so fuck 'em. Didn't you know that humans are the most important animal on the planet and everything else should bow to us? It says right there in the Bible!!!1

5/2/2013 8:52:15 PM

dtownral
Suspended
26632 Posts
user info
edit post

Apparently FL is trying to pass something very similar, setting state standards and not allowing municipalities to exceed those
http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2013/0999/BillText/Filed/PDF

this could have detrimental impacts on wetlands and manatees and other wildlife in florida

fuck ALEC

5/4/2013 9:16:37 AM

wdprice3
BinaryBuffonary
45912 Posts
user info
edit post

wait, is this the "same" bill as H480?

5/7/2013 1:39:06 PM

Shaggy
All American
17820 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Small government= pro corporation"


also large government = pro-corporation

5/7/2013 1:50:04 PM

HockeyRoman
All American
11811 Posts
user info
edit post

Yet FL won't make any meaningful legislation against the introduction of invasive species. I'm looking at you, pythons!

5/7/2013 3:18:22 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

http://hulkhogan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/bio-hulkhogan.png?

[Edited on May 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM. Reason : damn soap box]

5/7/2013 3:43:03 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » NCGA "environmental reform" bill Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.